Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bed
Abstract Biomass is one of the most versatile sustainable energy sources. This versatility allows utilization of different biomass feedstock using a verity of conversion techniques. Often, a biomass‐to‐bioenergy conversion method is selected depending on the application, end‐use product, and the typ...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | IET Renewable Power Generation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12196 |
| _version_ | 1811266418369363968 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohammad Ali Bagherian Kamyar Mehranzamir Jubaer Ahmed Marwan Nafea Hadi Nabipour‐Afrouzi Chin‐leong Wooi Amin Beiranvand Pour Shahabaldin Rezania Seyed Morteza Alizadeh |
| author_facet | Mohammad Ali Bagherian Kamyar Mehranzamir Jubaer Ahmed Marwan Nafea Hadi Nabipour‐Afrouzi Chin‐leong Wooi Amin Beiranvand Pour Shahabaldin Rezania Seyed Morteza Alizadeh |
| author_sort | Mohammad Ali Bagherian |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Biomass is one of the most versatile sustainable energy sources. This versatility allows utilization of different biomass feedstock using a verity of conversion techniques. Often, a biomass‐to‐bioenergy conversion method is selected depending on the application, end‐use product, and the type of feedstock. In many applications such as residential energy supply, it is possible to select amongst various technologies. Although, there exist several challenges such as cost‐effectiveness and sustainability that constrains bioenergy development. To this end, this research elaborates on the impacts of different conversion methods on techno‐economic performance of bioenergy systems for residential energy supply. In this context, Organic Rankine Cycle based on direct combustion, and Dual Fluidized‐Bed technology based on gasification were selected for that purpose. A techno‐economic comparative analysis illustrates that the primary product of the system and fuel cost are the two most important factors in feasibility assessment. The negative impact of feedstock price was more severe on the Organic Rankine Cycle. For wood chips prices below 55$/t, Organic Rankine Cycle could be the better option due to lower capital and maintenance costs. In contrast, Dual Fluidized‐Bed could better tolerate the variation of feedstock price; offering 8% lower cost of energy at 65$/t wood chips. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T20:42:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9599ecdc085d41188efd579dcb077ac0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1752-1416 1752-1424 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T20:42:46Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IET Renewable Power Generation |
| spelling | doaj.art-9599ecdc085d41188efd579dcb077ac02022-12-22T03:17:22ZengWileyIET Renewable Power Generation1752-14161752-14242021-09-0115122596261410.1049/rpg2.12196Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bedMohammad Ali Bagherian0Kamyar Mehranzamir1Jubaer Ahmed2Marwan Nafea3Hadi Nabipour‐Afrouzi4Chin‐leong Wooi5Amin Beiranvand Pour6Shahabaldin Rezania7Seyed Morteza Alizadeh8École Polytechnique de Louvain Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain‐la‐Neuve 1348 BelgiumDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Nottingham Malaysia Jalan Broga Semenyih Selangor 43500 MalaysiaFaculty of Engineering Computing and Science Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Kuching 93350 MalaysiaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Nottingham Malaysia Jalan Broga Semenyih Selangor 43500 MalaysiaFaculty of Engineering Computing and Science Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Kuching 93350 MalaysiaCentre of Excellence for Renewable Energy, School of Electrical Systems, Engineering Universiti Malaysia Perlis Pauh Putra Campus 02600 Arau Perlis MalaysiaInstitute of Oceanography and Environment (INOS) Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT) Kuala Nerus Terengganu 21030 MalaysiaDepartment of Environment and Energy Sejong University Seoul 05006 South KoreaEngineering Institute of Technology Melbourne VIC 3000 AustraliaAbstract Biomass is one of the most versatile sustainable energy sources. This versatility allows utilization of different biomass feedstock using a verity of conversion techniques. Often, a biomass‐to‐bioenergy conversion method is selected depending on the application, end‐use product, and the type of feedstock. In many applications such as residential energy supply, it is possible to select amongst various technologies. Although, there exist several challenges such as cost‐effectiveness and sustainability that constrains bioenergy development. To this end, this research elaborates on the impacts of different conversion methods on techno‐economic performance of bioenergy systems for residential energy supply. In this context, Organic Rankine Cycle based on direct combustion, and Dual Fluidized‐Bed technology based on gasification were selected for that purpose. A techno‐economic comparative analysis illustrates that the primary product of the system and fuel cost are the two most important factors in feasibility assessment. The negative impact of feedstock price was more severe on the Organic Rankine Cycle. For wood chips prices below 55$/t, Organic Rankine Cycle could be the better option due to lower capital and maintenance costs. In contrast, Dual Fluidized‐Bed could better tolerate the variation of feedstock price; offering 8% lower cost of energy at 65$/t wood chips.https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12196Environmental issuesIndustrial processesEngineering materialsFuel processing industryBiotechnology industryPower system management, operation and economics |
| spellingShingle | Mohammad Ali Bagherian Kamyar Mehranzamir Jubaer Ahmed Marwan Nafea Hadi Nabipour‐Afrouzi Chin‐leong Wooi Amin Beiranvand Pour Shahabaldin Rezania Seyed Morteza Alizadeh Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bed IET Renewable Power Generation Environmental issues Industrial processes Engineering materials Fuel processing industry Biotechnology industry Power system management, operation and economics |
| title | Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bed |
| title_full | Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bed |
| title_fullStr | Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bed |
| title_full_unstemmed | Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bed |
| title_short | Techno‐economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off‐grid energy supply: A case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized‐bed |
| title_sort | techno economic analysis of direct combustion and gasification systems for off grid energy supply a case for organic rankine cycle and dual fluidized bed |
| topic | Environmental issues Industrial processes Engineering materials Fuel processing industry Biotechnology industry Power system management, operation and economics |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12196 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadalibagherian technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT kamyarmehranzamir technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT jubaerahmed technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT marwannafea technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT hadinabipourafrouzi technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT chinleongwooi technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT aminbeiranvandpour technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT shahabaldinrezania technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed AT seyedmortezaalizadeh technoeconomicanalysisofdirectcombustionandgasificationsystemsforoffgridenergysupplyacasefororganicrankinecycleanddualfluidizedbed |