The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance

The purpose of this study was to compare ground contact time between an optical measurement system and a force platform. Participants in this study included six collegiate level athletes who performed drop jumps and sprint strike steps for a total of 15 repetitions each. Ground contact data was simu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric D. Magrum, John P. Wagle, Brad H. DeWeese, Kimitake Sato, Michael H. Stone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/1/15
_version_ 1828119125409398784
author Eric D. Magrum
John P. Wagle
Brad H. DeWeese
Kimitake Sato
Michael H. Stone
author_facet Eric D. Magrum
John P. Wagle
Brad H. DeWeese
Kimitake Sato
Michael H. Stone
author_sort Eric D. Magrum
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to compare ground contact time between an optical measurement system and a force platform. Participants in this study included six collegiate level athletes who performed drop jumps and sprint strike steps for a total of 15 repetitions each. Ground contact data was simultaneously collected from an optical measurement system and a force platform, at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz. Data was then analyzed with Pearson’s correlation and paired sample t-tests. The measures from the optical measurement system were found to be significantly higher (p < 0.001) than measures from the force platform in both conditions. Although significantly different, the extremely large relationships (0.979, 0.993) found between the two devices suggest the optical sensor is able to detect similar changes in performance to that of a force platform. Practitioners may continue to utilize optical sensors to monitor performance as it may provide a superior user-friendly alternative to more traditional based monitoring procedures, but must comprehend the inherent limitations due to the design of the optical sensors.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:42:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-959aae2282b94f519c95436571f88536
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4663
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:42:12Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj.art-959aae2282b94f519c95436571f885362022-12-22T04:21:12ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632018-02-01611510.3390/sports6010015sports6010015The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports PerformanceEric D. Magrum0John P. Wagle1Brad H. DeWeese2Kimitake Sato3Michael H. Stone4Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USAThe purpose of this study was to compare ground contact time between an optical measurement system and a force platform. Participants in this study included six collegiate level athletes who performed drop jumps and sprint strike steps for a total of 15 repetitions each. Ground contact data was simultaneously collected from an optical measurement system and a force platform, at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz. Data was then analyzed with Pearson’s correlation and paired sample t-tests. The measures from the optical measurement system were found to be significantly higher (p < 0.001) than measures from the force platform in both conditions. Although significantly different, the extremely large relationships (0.979, 0.993) found between the two devices suggest the optical sensor is able to detect similar changes in performance to that of a force platform. Practitioners may continue to utilize optical sensors to monitor performance as it may provide a superior user-friendly alternative to more traditional based monitoring procedures, but must comprehend the inherent limitations due to the design of the optical sensors.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/1/15ground contact timeOptojumpforce platformsprintjumpingathletic performance
spellingShingle Eric D. Magrum
John P. Wagle
Brad H. DeWeese
Kimitake Sato
Michael H. Stone
The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance
Sports
ground contact time
Optojump
force platform
sprint
jumping
athletic performance
title The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance
title_full The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance
title_fullStr The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance
title_short The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance
title_sort use of an optical measurement system to monitor sports performance
topic ground contact time
Optojump
force platform
sprint
jumping
athletic performance
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/1/15
work_keys_str_mv AT ericdmagrum theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT johnpwagle theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT bradhdeweese theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT kimitakesato theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT michaelhstone theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT ericdmagrum useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT johnpwagle useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT bradhdeweese useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT kimitakesato useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance
AT michaelhstone useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance