The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance
The purpose of this study was to compare ground contact time between an optical measurement system and a force platform. Participants in this study included six collegiate level athletes who performed drop jumps and sprint strike steps for a total of 15 repetitions each. Ground contact data was simu...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Sports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/1/15 |
_version_ | 1828119125409398784 |
---|---|
author | Eric D. Magrum John P. Wagle Brad H. DeWeese Kimitake Sato Michael H. Stone |
author_facet | Eric D. Magrum John P. Wagle Brad H. DeWeese Kimitake Sato Michael H. Stone |
author_sort | Eric D. Magrum |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The purpose of this study was to compare ground contact time between an optical measurement system and a force platform. Participants in this study included six collegiate level athletes who performed drop jumps and sprint strike steps for a total of 15 repetitions each. Ground contact data was simultaneously collected from an optical measurement system and a force platform, at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz. Data was then analyzed with Pearson’s correlation and paired sample t-tests. The measures from the optical measurement system were found to be significantly higher (p < 0.001) than measures from the force platform in both conditions. Although significantly different, the extremely large relationships (0.979, 0.993) found between the two devices suggest the optical sensor is able to detect similar changes in performance to that of a force platform. Practitioners may continue to utilize optical sensors to monitor performance as it may provide a superior user-friendly alternative to more traditional based monitoring procedures, but must comprehend the inherent limitations due to the design of the optical sensors. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:42:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-959aae2282b94f519c95436571f88536 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-4663 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:42:12Z |
publishDate | 2018-02-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Sports |
spelling | doaj.art-959aae2282b94f519c95436571f885362022-12-22T04:21:12ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632018-02-01611510.3390/sports6010015sports6010015The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports PerformanceEric D. Magrum0John P. Wagle1Brad H. DeWeese2Kimitake Sato3Michael H. Stone4Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USADepartment of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USAThe purpose of this study was to compare ground contact time between an optical measurement system and a force platform. Participants in this study included six collegiate level athletes who performed drop jumps and sprint strike steps for a total of 15 repetitions each. Ground contact data was simultaneously collected from an optical measurement system and a force platform, at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz. Data was then analyzed with Pearson’s correlation and paired sample t-tests. The measures from the optical measurement system were found to be significantly higher (p < 0.001) than measures from the force platform in both conditions. Although significantly different, the extremely large relationships (0.979, 0.993) found between the two devices suggest the optical sensor is able to detect similar changes in performance to that of a force platform. Practitioners may continue to utilize optical sensors to monitor performance as it may provide a superior user-friendly alternative to more traditional based monitoring procedures, but must comprehend the inherent limitations due to the design of the optical sensors.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/1/15ground contact timeOptojumpforce platformsprintjumpingathletic performance |
spellingShingle | Eric D. Magrum John P. Wagle Brad H. DeWeese Kimitake Sato Michael H. Stone The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance Sports ground contact time Optojump force platform sprint jumping athletic performance |
title | The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance |
title_full | The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance |
title_fullStr | The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance |
title_short | The Use of an Optical Measurement System to Monitor Sports Performance |
title_sort | use of an optical measurement system to monitor sports performance |
topic | ground contact time Optojump force platform sprint jumping athletic performance |
url | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/6/1/15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ericdmagrum theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT johnpwagle theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT bradhdeweese theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT kimitakesato theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT michaelhstone theuseofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT ericdmagrum useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT johnpwagle useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT bradhdeweese useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT kimitakesato useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance AT michaelhstone useofanopticalmeasurementsystemtomonitorsportsperformance |