Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction

Bacground: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor for oral cancers (oral squamous cell carcinoma [OSCC]). The correlation of margin with the type of reconstruction has never been studied. Aim: This study aimed to correlate surgical margins with the type of reconstruction. Methods: This wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Apurva Garg, Manish Mair, Hitesh Singhavi, Muddasir Bhati, Akshat Malik, Aseem Mishra, Deepa Nair, Sudhir Nair, Pankaj Chaturvedi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2020-01-01
Series:South Asian Journal of Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/sajc.sajc_366_18
_version_ 1818387790018117632
author Apurva Garg
Manish Mair
Hitesh Singhavi
Muddasir Bhati
Akshat Malik
Aseem Mishra
Deepa Nair
Sudhir Nair
Pankaj Chaturvedi
author_facet Apurva Garg
Manish Mair
Hitesh Singhavi
Muddasir Bhati
Akshat Malik
Aseem Mishra
Deepa Nair
Sudhir Nair
Pankaj Chaturvedi
author_sort Apurva Garg
collection DOAJ
description Bacground: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor for oral cancers (oral squamous cell carcinoma [OSCC]). The correlation of margin with the type of reconstruction has never been studied. Aim: This study aimed to correlate surgical margins with the type of reconstruction. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 410 treatment-naïve OSCC patients. As per the methods of reconstruction, three groups were made when reconstruction was performed using pedicled flap (PF) or local flap, free flap, and primary closure (PC). Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test was used for comparison of margin status as per the method of reconstruction. Mann–Whitney test was used to find the difference between the mean margin width with respect to the type of reconstruction. Results: The overall incidence of close/positive margins was 7.8%. The incidence of close/positive margins was not significantly different in free flap group compared to PF (P = 0.06) or PC (P = 0.835) group. However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of close/positive margins between PC and PF groups (P = 0.021). Whether the reconstruction is performed by the primary surgeon or by a another surgeon, it did not have an impact on adequacy of margins (P = 0.334). Margins were wider when the reconstruction is performed by a different team (P = 0.015) or when reconstruction is performed as compared to PC. Conclusion: Margins are not affected by the type of reconstruction (pedicled vs. free flap) and the team doing reconstruction (same vs. another team). Margins are significantly compromised when a surgeon performs PC himself/herself compared to PF.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:15:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95adc8e3b36c492ab7422679f9055aee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2278-330X
2278-4306
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:15:32Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series South Asian Journal of Cancer
spelling doaj.art-95adc8e3b36c492ab7422679f9055aee2022-12-21T23:17:33ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.South Asian Journal of Cancer2278-330X2278-43062020-01-010901343710.4103/sajc.sajc_366_18Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstructionApurva Garg0Manish Mair1Hitesh Singhavi2Muddasir Bhati3Akshat Malik4Aseem Mishra5Deepa Nair6Sudhir Nair7Pankaj Chaturvedi8Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, MaharashtraBacground: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor for oral cancers (oral squamous cell carcinoma [OSCC]). The correlation of margin with the type of reconstruction has never been studied. Aim: This study aimed to correlate surgical margins with the type of reconstruction. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 410 treatment-naïve OSCC patients. As per the methods of reconstruction, three groups were made when reconstruction was performed using pedicled flap (PF) or local flap, free flap, and primary closure (PC). Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test was used for comparison of margin status as per the method of reconstruction. Mann–Whitney test was used to find the difference between the mean margin width with respect to the type of reconstruction. Results: The overall incidence of close/positive margins was 7.8%. The incidence of close/positive margins was not significantly different in free flap group compared to PF (P = 0.06) or PC (P = 0.835) group. However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of close/positive margins between PC and PF groups (P = 0.021). Whether the reconstruction is performed by the primary surgeon or by a another surgeon, it did not have an impact on adequacy of margins (P = 0.334). Margins were wider when the reconstruction is performed by a different team (P = 0.015) or when reconstruction is performed as compared to PC. Conclusion: Margins are not affected by the type of reconstruction (pedicled vs. free flap) and the team doing reconstruction (same vs. another team). Margins are significantly compromised when a surgeon performs PC himself/herself compared to PF.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/sajc.sajc_366_18free flapmarginsoral cancersprimary closurereconstruction
spellingShingle Apurva Garg
Manish Mair
Hitesh Singhavi
Muddasir Bhati
Akshat Malik
Aseem Mishra
Deepa Nair
Sudhir Nair
Pankaj Chaturvedi
Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction
South Asian Journal of Cancer
free flap
margins
oral cancers
primary closure
reconstruction
title Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction
title_full Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction
title_fullStr Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction
title_short Adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction
title_sort adequacy of surgical margins in oral cancer patients with respect to various types of reconstruction
topic free flap
margins
oral cancers
primary closure
reconstruction
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/sajc.sajc_366_18
work_keys_str_mv AT apurvagarg adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT manishmair adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT hiteshsinghavi adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT muddasirbhati adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT akshatmalik adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT aseemmishra adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT deepanair adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT sudhirnair adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction
AT pankajchaturvedi adequacyofsurgicalmarginsinoralcancerpatientswithrespecttovarioustypesofreconstruction