Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease

PRINCIPLES: Prediction of arrhythmic events (AEs) has gained importance with the availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), but is still imprecise. This study evaluated the innovative Wedensky modulation index (WMI) as predictor of AEs. METHODS: In this prospective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas W Schoenenberger, Olivia Schär, Richard Kobza, Paul Erne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2014-02-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1825
_version_ 1811194166630154240
author Andreas W Schoenenberger
Olivia Schär
Richard Kobza
Paul Erne
author_facet Andreas W Schoenenberger
Olivia Schär
Richard Kobza
Paul Erne
author_sort Andreas W Schoenenberger
collection DOAJ
description PRINCIPLES: Prediction of arrhythmic events (AEs) has gained importance with the availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), but is still imprecise. This study evaluated the innovative Wedensky modulation index (WMI) as predictor of AEs. METHODS: In this prospective cohort, 179 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for AE risk assessment underwent baseline evaluation including measurement of R-/T-wave WMI (WMIRT) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Two endpoints were assessed 3 years after the baseline evaluation: sudden cardiac death or appropriate ICD event (EP1) and any cardiac death or appropriate ICD event (EP2). Associations between baseline predictors (WMIRT and LVEF) and endpoints were evaluated in regression models. RESULTS: Only three patients were lost to follow-up. EP1 and EP2 occurred in 24 and 27 patients, respectively. WMIRT (odds ratio [OR] per 1 point increase for EP1 20.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–221.4, p = 0.014, and for EP2 73.3, 95% CI 6.6–817.7, p <0.001) and LVEF (OR per 1% increase for EP1 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.99, p = 0.013, and for EP2 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.97, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with both endpoints. In bivariable regression controlled for LVEF, WMIRT was independently associated with EP1 (p = 0.047) and EP2 (p = 0.007). The combination of WMIRT ≥0.60 and LVEF ≤30% resulted in a positive predictive value of 36% for EP1 and 50% for EP2. CONCLUSIONS: WMIRT is a significant predictor of AEs independent of LVEF and has potential to improve AE risk prediction in CAD patients. However, WMIRT should be evaluated in larger and independent samples before recommendations for clinical routine can be made.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:21:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95af043728884672a3b80dab37eb8111
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:21:23Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-95af043728884672a3b80dab37eb81112022-12-22T03:55:43ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972014-02-01144070810.4414/smw.2014.13929Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery diseaseAndreas W SchoenenbergerOlivia SchärRichard KobzaPaul Erne PRINCIPLES: Prediction of arrhythmic events (AEs) has gained importance with the availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), but is still imprecise. This study evaluated the innovative Wedensky modulation index (WMI) as predictor of AEs. METHODS: In this prospective cohort, 179 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for AE risk assessment underwent baseline evaluation including measurement of R-/T-wave WMI (WMIRT) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Two endpoints were assessed 3 years after the baseline evaluation: sudden cardiac death or appropriate ICD event (EP1) and any cardiac death or appropriate ICD event (EP2). Associations between baseline predictors (WMIRT and LVEF) and endpoints were evaluated in regression models. RESULTS: Only three patients were lost to follow-up. EP1 and EP2 occurred in 24 and 27 patients, respectively. WMIRT (odds ratio [OR] per 1 point increase for EP1 20.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–221.4, p = 0.014, and for EP2 73.3, 95% CI 6.6–817.7, p <0.001) and LVEF (OR per 1% increase for EP1 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.99, p = 0.013, and for EP2 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.97, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with both endpoints. In bivariable regression controlled for LVEF, WMIRT was independently associated with EP1 (p = 0.047) and EP2 (p = 0.007). The combination of WMIRT ≥0.60 and LVEF ≤30% resulted in a positive predictive value of 36% for EP1 and 50% for EP2. CONCLUSIONS: WMIRT is a significant predictor of AEs independent of LVEF and has potential to improve AE risk prediction in CAD patients. However, WMIRT should be evaluated in larger and independent samples before recommendations for clinical routine can be made. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1825wedensky inhibition.
spellingShingle Andreas W Schoenenberger
Olivia Schär
Richard Kobza
Paul Erne
Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease
Swiss Medical Weekly
wedensky inhibition.
title Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease
title_full Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease
title_fullStr Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease
title_short Prediction of arrhythmic events by Wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease
title_sort prediction of arrhythmic events by wedensky modulation in patients with coronary artery disease
topic wedensky inhibition.
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1825
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaswschoenenberger predictionofarrhythmiceventsbywedenskymodulationinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT oliviaschar predictionofarrhythmiceventsbywedenskymodulationinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT richardkobza predictionofarrhythmiceventsbywedenskymodulationinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT paulerne predictionofarrhythmiceventsbywedenskymodulationinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease