Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong Kong

Tended to view disability inclusion as merely another mandate, building and construction practitioners have yet to recognize its value in social sustainability. In academia, similarly, it has received less attention than other building performance attributes such as environmental friendliness and in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wai Kin Lau, Daniel Chi Wing Ho, Yung Yau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2016-06-01
Series:International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/2081
_version_ 1818876649480912896
author Wai Kin Lau
Daniel Chi Wing Ho
Yung Yau
author_facet Wai Kin Lau
Daniel Chi Wing Ho
Yung Yau
author_sort Wai Kin Lau
collection DOAJ
description Tended to view disability inclusion as merely another mandate, building and construction practitioners have yet to recognize its value in social sustainability. In academia, similarly, it has received less attention than other building performance attributes such as environmental friendliness and indoor air quality. With rights to access now acknowledged as basic human rights, there is demand for a tool to assess building disability inclusiveness, indicating the extent to which building considerations include persons with disabilities (PWDs). This paper proposes a Building Inclusiveness Assessment Score (BIAS) to fill the existing gap. The BIAS framework comprises two hierarchies of inclusion attributes identified from literature, guides, and standards of barrier-free access and universal design. The final product consists of two building disability inclusiveness assessment tools: the Physical Disability Inclusion Sub-score (PDIS) and the Visual Impairment Inclusion Sub-score (VIIS). These are simple, quantitative, objective tools for assessing buildings. We performed a Monte Carlo simulation to validate the assessment protocols. Following the validation, we assessed 48 university buildings at four universities in Hong Kong to illustrate the real-life application of the tools.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T13:45:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95b3e10ecdf14a0daa9f4d7e23ccfbcc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1648-715X
1648-9179
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T13:45:45Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Strategic Property Management
spelling doaj.art-95b3e10ecdf14a0daa9f4d7e23ccfbcc2022-12-21T20:18:53ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management1648-715X1648-91792016-06-0120210.3846/1648715X.2015.1107653Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong KongWai Kin Lau0Daniel Chi Wing Ho1Yung Yau2Department of Real Estate and Construction, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaDepartment of Real Estate and Construction, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaDepartment of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ChinaTended to view disability inclusion as merely another mandate, building and construction practitioners have yet to recognize its value in social sustainability. In academia, similarly, it has received less attention than other building performance attributes such as environmental friendliness and indoor air quality. With rights to access now acknowledged as basic human rights, there is demand for a tool to assess building disability inclusiveness, indicating the extent to which building considerations include persons with disabilities (PWDs). This paper proposes a Building Inclusiveness Assessment Score (BIAS) to fill the existing gap. The BIAS framework comprises two hierarchies of inclusion attributes identified from literature, guides, and standards of barrier-free access and universal design. The final product consists of two building disability inclusiveness assessment tools: the Physical Disability Inclusion Sub-score (PDIS) and the Visual Impairment Inclusion Sub-score (VIIS). These are simple, quantitative, objective tools for assessing buildings. We performed a Monte Carlo simulation to validate the assessment protocols. Following the validation, we assessed 48 university buildings at four universities in Hong Kong to illustrate the real-life application of the tools.https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/2081Building performance assessmentDisability inclusionFacility management,Nonstructural fuzzy decision support systemUniversal design
spellingShingle Wai Kin Lau
Daniel Chi Wing Ho
Yung Yau
Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong Kong
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Building performance assessment
Disability inclusion
Facility management,
Nonstructural fuzzy decision support system
Universal design
title Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong Kong
title_full Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong Kong
title_fullStr Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong Kong
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong Kong
title_short Assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in Hong Kong
title_sort assessing the disability inclusiveness of university buildings in hong kong
topic Building performance assessment
Disability inclusion
Facility management,
Nonstructural fuzzy decision support system
Universal design
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/2081
work_keys_str_mv AT waikinlau assessingthedisabilityinclusivenessofuniversitybuildingsinhongkong
AT danielchiwingho assessingthedisabilityinclusivenessofuniversitybuildingsinhongkong
AT yungyau assessingthedisabilityinclusivenessofuniversitybuildingsinhongkong