Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
Abstract Introduction Economic evaluation studies demonstrate the value of money in health interventions and enhance the efficiency of the healthcare system. Therefore, this study reviews published economic evaluation studies of public health interventions from 26 Middle East and North Africa (MENA)...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-07-01
|
Series: | Global Health Research and Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y |
_version_ | 1811222933072248832 |
---|---|
author | Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri Montarat Thavorncharoensap Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi |
author_facet | Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri Montarat Thavorncharoensap Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi |
author_sort | Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Introduction Economic evaluation studies demonstrate the value of money in health interventions and enhance the efficiency of the healthcare system. Therefore, this study reviews published economic evaluation studies of public health interventions from 26 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries and examines whether they addressed the region's major health problems. Methods PubMed and Scopus were utilized to search for relevant articles published up to June 26, 2021. The reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Results The search identified 61 studies. Approximately half (28 studies; 46%) were conducted in Israel and Iran. The main areas of interest for economic evaluation studies were infectious diseases (21 studies; 34%), cancers (13 studies; 21%), and genetic disorders (nine studies; 15%). Five (8%), 39 (64%), 16 (26%), and one (2%) studies were classified as excellent, high, average, and poor quality, respectively. The mean of CHEERS checklist items reported was 80.8% (SD 14%). Reporting the structure and justification of the selected model was missed in 21 studies (37%), while price and conversion rates and the analytical methods were missed in 21 studies (34%). Conclusions The quantity of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions in the MENA region remains low; however, the overall quality is high to excellent. There were obvious geographic gaps across countries regarding the number and quality of studies and gaps within countries concerning disease prioritization. The observed research output, however, did not reflect current and upcoming disease burden and risk factors trends in the MENA region. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:23:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-95b756c17af74e70a5cf80833709c9ce |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2397-0642 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:23:15Z |
publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Global Health Research and Policy |
spelling | doaj.art-95b756c17af74e70a5cf80833709c9ce2022-12-22T03:40:29ZengBMCGlobal Health Research and Policy2397-06422022-07-017115110.1186/s41256-022-00258-yDoes health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventionsMouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi0Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq1Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri2Montarat Thavorncharoensap3Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi4Doctor of Philosophy Program in Social, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversityMaster of Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of MalayaSocial and Administrative Pharmacy Excellence Research (SAPER) Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversitySocial and Administrative Pharmacy Excellence Research (SAPER) Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversityDoctor of Philosophy Program in Social, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversityAbstract Introduction Economic evaluation studies demonstrate the value of money in health interventions and enhance the efficiency of the healthcare system. Therefore, this study reviews published economic evaluation studies of public health interventions from 26 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries and examines whether they addressed the region's major health problems. Methods PubMed and Scopus were utilized to search for relevant articles published up to June 26, 2021. The reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Results The search identified 61 studies. Approximately half (28 studies; 46%) were conducted in Israel and Iran. The main areas of interest for economic evaluation studies were infectious diseases (21 studies; 34%), cancers (13 studies; 21%), and genetic disorders (nine studies; 15%). Five (8%), 39 (64%), 16 (26%), and one (2%) studies were classified as excellent, high, average, and poor quality, respectively. The mean of CHEERS checklist items reported was 80.8% (SD 14%). Reporting the structure and justification of the selected model was missed in 21 studies (37%), while price and conversion rates and the analytical methods were missed in 21 studies (34%). Conclusions The quantity of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions in the MENA region remains low; however, the overall quality is high to excellent. There were obvious geographic gaps across countries regarding the number and quality of studies and gaps within countries concerning disease prioritization. The observed research output, however, did not reflect current and upcoming disease burden and risk factors trends in the MENA region.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00258-yCost-effectivenessEconomic evaluationMiddle EastNorth AfricaPublic health |
spellingShingle | Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri Montarat Thavorncharoensap Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions Global Health Research and Policy Cost-effectiveness Economic evaluation Middle East North Africa Public health |
title | Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions |
title_full | Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions |
title_fullStr | Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions |
title_short | Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions |
title_sort | does health economics research align with the disease burden in the middle east and north africa region a systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions |
topic | Cost-effectiveness Economic evaluation Middle East North Africa Public health |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mouaddhabdulmaliknagi doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions AT mustafaalialirezq doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions AT sermsirisangroongruangsri doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions AT montaratthavorncharoensap doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions AT pramithaeshanirmaladewi doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions |