Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions

Abstract Introduction Economic evaluation studies demonstrate the value of money in health interventions and enhance the efficiency of the healthcare system. Therefore, this study reviews published economic evaluation studies of public health interventions from 26 Middle East and North Africa (MENA)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi, Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq, Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri, Montarat Thavorncharoensap, Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-07-01
Series:Global Health Research and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y
_version_ 1811222933072248832
author Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi
Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq
Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri
Montarat Thavorncharoensap
Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
author_facet Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi
Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq
Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri
Montarat Thavorncharoensap
Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
author_sort Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Economic evaluation studies demonstrate the value of money in health interventions and enhance the efficiency of the healthcare system. Therefore, this study reviews published economic evaluation studies of public health interventions from 26 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries and examines whether they addressed the region's major health problems. Methods PubMed and Scopus were utilized to search for relevant articles published up to June 26, 2021. The reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Results The search identified 61 studies. Approximately half (28 studies; 46%) were conducted in Israel and Iran. The main areas of interest for economic evaluation studies were infectious diseases (21 studies; 34%), cancers (13 studies; 21%), and genetic disorders (nine studies; 15%). Five (8%), 39 (64%), 16 (26%), and one (2%) studies were classified as excellent, high, average, and poor quality, respectively. The mean of CHEERS checklist items reported was 80.8% (SD 14%). Reporting the structure and justification of the selected model was missed in 21 studies (37%), while price and conversion rates and the analytical methods were missed in 21 studies (34%). Conclusions The quantity of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions in the MENA region remains low; however, the overall quality is high to excellent. There were obvious geographic gaps across countries regarding the number and quality of studies and gaps within countries concerning disease prioritization. The observed research output, however, did not reflect current and upcoming disease burden and risk factors trends in the MENA region.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:23:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95b756c17af74e70a5cf80833709c9ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2397-0642
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:23:15Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Global Health Research and Policy
spelling doaj.art-95b756c17af74e70a5cf80833709c9ce2022-12-22T03:40:29ZengBMCGlobal Health Research and Policy2397-06422022-07-017115110.1186/s41256-022-00258-yDoes health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventionsMouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi0Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq1Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri2Montarat Thavorncharoensap3Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi4Doctor of Philosophy Program in Social, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversityMaster of Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of MalayaSocial and Administrative Pharmacy Excellence Research (SAPER) Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversitySocial and Administrative Pharmacy Excellence Research (SAPER) Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversityDoctor of Philosophy Program in Social, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol UniversityAbstract Introduction Economic evaluation studies demonstrate the value of money in health interventions and enhance the efficiency of the healthcare system. Therefore, this study reviews published economic evaluation studies of public health interventions from 26 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries and examines whether they addressed the region's major health problems. Methods PubMed and Scopus were utilized to search for relevant articles published up to June 26, 2021. The reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Results The search identified 61 studies. Approximately half (28 studies; 46%) were conducted in Israel and Iran. The main areas of interest for economic evaluation studies were infectious diseases (21 studies; 34%), cancers (13 studies; 21%), and genetic disorders (nine studies; 15%). Five (8%), 39 (64%), 16 (26%), and one (2%) studies were classified as excellent, high, average, and poor quality, respectively. The mean of CHEERS checklist items reported was 80.8% (SD 14%). Reporting the structure and justification of the selected model was missed in 21 studies (37%), while price and conversion rates and the analytical methods were missed in 21 studies (34%). Conclusions The quantity of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions in the MENA region remains low; however, the overall quality is high to excellent. There were obvious geographic gaps across countries regarding the number and quality of studies and gaps within countries concerning disease prioritization. The observed research output, however, did not reflect current and upcoming disease burden and risk factors trends in the MENA region.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00258-yCost-effectivenessEconomic evaluationMiddle EastNorth AfricaPublic health
spellingShingle Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi
Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq
Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri
Montarat Thavorncharoensap
Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
Global Health Research and Policy
Cost-effectiveness
Economic evaluation
Middle East
North Africa
Public health
title Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
title_full Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
title_fullStr Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
title_full_unstemmed Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
title_short Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
title_sort does health economics research align with the disease burden in the middle east and north africa region a systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
topic Cost-effectiveness
Economic evaluation
Middle East
North Africa
Public health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mouaddhabdulmaliknagi doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions
AT mustafaalialirezq doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions
AT sermsirisangroongruangsri doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions
AT montaratthavorncharoensap doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions
AT pramithaeshanirmaladewi doeshealtheconomicsresearchalignwiththediseaseburdeninthemiddleeastandnorthafricaregionasystematicreviewofeconomicevaluationstudiesonpublichealthinterventions