Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up

Aims: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. Methods: In this case-control study,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter B. Jørgensen, Stig S. Jakobsen, Dovydas Vainorius, Morten Homilius, Torben B. Hansen, Maiken Stilling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-07-01
Series:Bone & Joint Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1
_version_ 1797771310520074240
author Peter B. Jørgensen
Stig S. Jakobsen
Dovydas Vainorius
Morten Homilius
Torben B. Hansen
Maiken Stilling
author_facet Peter B. Jørgensen
Stig S. Jakobsen
Dovydas Vainorius
Morten Homilius
Torben B. Hansen
Maiken Stilling
author_sort Peter B. Jørgensen
collection DOAJ
description Aims: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. Methods: In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up. Results: At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness. Conclusion: The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):507–515.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:35:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95b81b94aaa34f3d8f428916cec00479
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2633-1462
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:35:41Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format Article
series Bone & Joint Open
spelling doaj.art-95b81b94aaa34f3d8f428916cec004792023-07-27T07:35:00ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Open2633-14622023-07-014750751510.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-upPeter B. Jørgensen0Stig S. Jakobsen1Dovydas Vainorius2Morten Homilius3Torben B. Hansen4Maiken Stilling5AutoRSA Reseach Group Orthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gødstrup Regional Hospital, Herning, DenmarkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gødstrup Regional Hospital, Herning, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkAutoRSA Reseach Group Orthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkAims: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. Methods: In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up. Results: At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness. Conclusion: The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):507–515.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1radiostereometric analysishipdorr type ashort stemthafemoraexeter stemsradiostereometric analysisoxford hip score (ohs)osteoporosisosteopeniadual x-ray absorptiometrybone qualityprimary hip osteoarthritist-test
spellingShingle Peter B. Jørgensen
Stig S. Jakobsen
Dovydas Vainorius
Morten Homilius
Torben B. Hansen
Maiken Stilling
Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
Bone & Joint Open
radiostereometric analysis
hip
dorr type a
short stem
tha
femora
exeter stems
radiostereometric analysis
oxford hip score (ohs)
osteoporosis
osteopenia
dual x-ray absorptiometry
bone quality
primary hip osteoarthritis
t-test
title Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_full Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_fullStr Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_short Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_sort less early subsidence of cemented exeter short stems compared with cemented exeter standard stems in dorr type a femurs a radiostereometry study with minimum five years follow up
topic radiostereometric analysis
hip
dorr type a
short stem
tha
femora
exeter stems
radiostereometric analysis
oxford hip score (ohs)
osteoporosis
osteopenia
dual x-ray absorptiometry
bone quality
primary hip osteoarthritis
t-test
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbjørgensen lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT stigsjakobsen lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT dovydasvainorius lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT mortenhomilius lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT torbenbhansen lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT maikenstilling lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup