The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops

In the late middle ages, the Brabantine city of Leuven was a regional production centre of sculpture that followed artistical trends being set in Brussels. The Leuven sculptors had a varied clientele and received commissions from far beyond the city walls. However, they were not organised in their o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marjan Debaene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Art History, University of Birmingham 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Art Historiography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/debaene.pdf
_version_ 1818392135766900736
author Marjan Debaene
author_facet Marjan Debaene
author_sort Marjan Debaene
collection DOAJ
description In the late middle ages, the Brabantine city of Leuven was a regional production centre of sculpture that followed artistical trends being set in Brussels. The Leuven sculptors had a varied clientele and received commissions from far beyond the city walls. However, they were not organised in their own corporation and therefore did not apply a system of trademarks to allow quality control. The result was that in the archives many sculptors are known by name, but they can hardly ever be linked to a body of work. Conversely, many remaining sculptures cannot be attributed to a specific sculptor. This paper will discuss the case of two anonymous Leuven masters who were provisionally named in the 1970s and who have been assigned a body of works as their oeuvre: the Master of the Crucified Christ Figures and the Master of Christ on the Cold Stone. These notnames are filled with speculation, as the researchers that created these unknown masters made some methodological errors. Since the 1970s, research has barely progressed, and the notnames have often started to live a life of their own. This paper offers a different approach to analysing these sculptures and possibly re-grouping them, by showing that stylistic analysis and connoisseurship are only some of many tools and methodologies that can be used to research anonymous late gothic sculpture, such as technical research and cultural space contextualisation, the ultimate goal being to achieve a more nuanced and far richer image of the sculpture workshops active in Leuven around 1500, where the names or notnames of the sculptors are of lesser importance.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:24:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95c41698ca8b4fb58ed093797b7a4647
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2042-4752
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:24:37Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
record_format Article
series Journal of Art Historiography
spelling doaj.art-95c41698ca8b4fb58ed093797b7a46472022-12-21T23:15:35ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522020-06-012222MD1The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshopsMarjan Debaene 0museum M in LeuvenIn the late middle ages, the Brabantine city of Leuven was a regional production centre of sculpture that followed artistical trends being set in Brussels. The Leuven sculptors had a varied clientele and received commissions from far beyond the city walls. However, they were not organised in their own corporation and therefore did not apply a system of trademarks to allow quality control. The result was that in the archives many sculptors are known by name, but they can hardly ever be linked to a body of work. Conversely, many remaining sculptures cannot be attributed to a specific sculptor. This paper will discuss the case of two anonymous Leuven masters who were provisionally named in the 1970s and who have been assigned a body of works as their oeuvre: the Master of the Crucified Christ Figures and the Master of Christ on the Cold Stone. These notnames are filled with speculation, as the researchers that created these unknown masters made some methodological errors. Since the 1970s, research has barely progressed, and the notnames have often started to live a life of their own. This paper offers a different approach to analysing these sculptures and possibly re-grouping them, by showing that stylistic analysis and connoisseurship are only some of many tools and methodologies that can be used to research anonymous late gothic sculpture, such as technical research and cultural space contextualisation, the ultimate goal being to achieve a more nuanced and far richer image of the sculpture workshops active in Leuven around 1500, where the names or notnames of the sculptors are of lesser importance.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/debaene.pdfbrabantleuvenwooden sculpturenotnameworkshop
spellingShingle Marjan Debaene
The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops
Journal of Art Historiography
brabant
leuven
wooden sculpture
notname
workshop
title The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops
title_full The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops
title_fullStr The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops
title_full_unstemmed The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops
title_short The problem with Leuven sculpture around 1500: the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops
title_sort problem with leuven sculpture around 1500 the creation of anonymous sculpture workshops
topic brabant
leuven
wooden sculpture
notname
workshop
url https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/debaene.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marjandebaene theproblemwithleuvensculpturearound1500thecreationofanonymoussculptureworkshops
AT marjandebaene problemwithleuvensculpturearound1500thecreationofanonymoussculptureworkshops