THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS

In addressing how to evaluate online discussions, this paper will describe several concepts, tools, or frameworks that have been used in evaluations and discuss differences in approach based on instructor purpose, be it research, assessment, or learning. Then several common problems are described,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katrina A. Meyer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Online Learning Consortium 2019-03-01
Series:Online Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/1746
_version_ 1797328054135029760
author Katrina A. Meyer
author_facet Katrina A. Meyer
author_sort Katrina A. Meyer
collection DOAJ
description In addressing how to evaluate online discussions, this paper will describe several concepts, tools, or frameworks that have been used in evaluations and discuss differences in approach based on instructor purpose, be it research, assessment, or learning. Then several common problems are described, including use of content analysis, identification of latent content, inadequate training of coders, lack of reliability, and choosing the correct unit of analysis. Two examples are provided of coding decisions made on portions of student discussions; these examples use two different frameworks to elucidate the process and its difficulties. Conclusions focus on the importance of following standard good research or assessment practice and preparing for a time-consuming and often frustrating coding process.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:46:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95d850d317bb48d286e09b9825a2e97c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2472-5749
2472-5730
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:46:21Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Online Learning Consortium
record_format Article
series Online Learning
spelling doaj.art-95d850d317bb48d286e09b9825a2e97c2024-02-03T07:58:26ZengOnline Learning ConsortiumOnline Learning2472-57492472-57302019-03-0110410.24059/olj.v10i4.1746THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONSKatrina A. Meyer In addressing how to evaluate online discussions, this paper will describe several concepts, tools, or frameworks that have been used in evaluations and discuss differences in approach based on instructor purpose, be it research, assessment, or learning. Then several common problems are described, including use of content analysis, identification of latent content, inadequate training of coders, lack of reliability, and choosing the correct unit of analysis. Two examples are provided of coding decisions made on portions of student discussions; these examples use two different frameworks to elucidate the process and its difficulties. Conclusions focus on the importance of following standard good research or assessment practice and preparing for a time-consuming and often frustrating coding process. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/1746Online LearningEvaluation of Online DiscussionsMethodology
spellingShingle Katrina A. Meyer
THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
Online Learning
Online Learning
Evaluation of Online Discussions
Methodology
title THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
title_full THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
title_fullStr THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
title_full_unstemmed THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
title_short THE METHOD (AND MADNESS) OF EVALUATING ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
title_sort method and madness of evaluating online discussions
topic Online Learning
Evaluation of Online Discussions
Methodology
url https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/1746
work_keys_str_mv AT katrinaameyer themethodandmadnessofevaluatingonlinediscussions
AT katrinaameyer methodandmadnessofevaluatingonlinediscussions