Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas
Background: After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | One Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771420302615 |
| _version_ | 1818402517570027520 |
|---|---|
| author | Xinhua Yu |
| author_facet | Xinhua Yu |
| author_sort | Xinhua Yu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process. Methods: Publicly available data for the time series of COVID-19 cases and deaths and weather were analyzed at the metropolitan level. The time-varying reproductive numbers (Rt) based on retrospective moving average were used to explore the trends. Student t-tests were used to compare temperature and peak Rt cross-sectionally. Results: We found that virus transmissibility, measured by instantaneous reproduction number (Rt), had declined since the end of March for all areas and almost all of them reached a Rt of 1 or below after April 15, 2020. The timing of the main decline was concurrent with the implementation of mitigating interventions. However, the Rts remained around 1 for most areas since then and there were some small and short rebounds in some areas, suggesting a persistent epidemic in those areas when interventions were relaxed. Cities with warm temperature also tended to have a lower peak Rt than that of cities with cold temperature. However, they were not statistically significant and large geographic variations existed. Conclusions: Aggressive interventions might have mitigated the current pandemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T08:09:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-95da3fe2bb3942c7ab8a7548b6c1a42c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2352-7714 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T08:09:37Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | One Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-95da3fe2bb3942c7ab8a7548b6c1a42c2022-12-21T23:10:05ZengElsevierOne Health2352-77142020-12-0110100160Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areasXinhua Yu0Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, USABackground: After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process. Methods: Publicly available data for the time series of COVID-19 cases and deaths and weather were analyzed at the metropolitan level. The time-varying reproductive numbers (Rt) based on retrospective moving average were used to explore the trends. Student t-tests were used to compare temperature and peak Rt cross-sectionally. Results: We found that virus transmissibility, measured by instantaneous reproduction number (Rt), had declined since the end of March for all areas and almost all of them reached a Rt of 1 or below after April 15, 2020. The timing of the main decline was concurrent with the implementation of mitigating interventions. However, the Rts remained around 1 for most areas since then and there were some small and short rebounds in some areas, suggesting a persistent epidemic in those areas when interventions were relaxed. Cities with warm temperature also tended to have a lower peak Rt than that of cities with cold temperature. However, they were not statistically significant and large geographic variations existed. Conclusions: Aggressive interventions might have mitigated the current pandemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771420302615Virus transmissibilityReproduction numberMitigating interventionTemperatureCOVID-19 epidemic |
| spellingShingle | Xinhua Yu Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas One Health Virus transmissibility Reproduction number Mitigating intervention Temperature COVID-19 epidemic |
| title | Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas |
| title_full | Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas |
| title_fullStr | Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas |
| title_short | Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas |
| title_sort | impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the covid 19 pandemic among 30 us metropolitan areas |
| topic | Virus transmissibility Reproduction number Mitigating intervention Temperature COVID-19 epidemic |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771420302615 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xinhuayu impactofmitigatinginterventionsandtemperatureontheinstantaneousreproductionnumberinthecovid19pandemicamong30usmetropolitanareas |