South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law matters

The United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 (CRC), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, 1990 (ACRWC) and sections 6(5), 10, and 31(1)(a) of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 (Children’s Act) place an obligation on South African courts to determine children’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alet Magdaleen Uys
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Pretoria University Law Press 2023-01-01
Series:De Jure
Online Access:https://www.dejure.up.ac.za/uys-a-m
_version_ 1797257960633663488
author Alet Magdaleen Uys
author_facet Alet Magdaleen Uys
author_sort Alet Magdaleen Uys
collection DOAJ
description The United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 (CRC), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, 1990 (ACRWC) and sections 6(5), 10, and 31(1)(a) of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 (Children’s Act) place an obligation on South African courts to determine children’s views in their parents’ family law matters. This article analyses thirteen judgments stretching from 2003 - 2020 and one 2018 psychological study in relation to parenting plans to ascertain how South African courts determine children’s views and wishes in practice. The judgments selected relate to divorces and disputes regarding children’s primary residence and care and contact (custody and access disputes), disputes where a parent intends emigrating with children, and matters were a parent abducted a child. The judgments indicate courts have diverging approaches to determining children’s views and wishes in family law matters. The 2018 psychological study found legal practitioners unfortunately fail to take into account children’s inputs for purposes of drafting their parents’ parenting plans. In light of courts’ diverging approaches to determining a child’s voice in their parents’ litigious matters, as well as the current complete lack of guidelines in this regard, there is a need to amend the Children’s Act to assist courts with particular regulations or guidelines in this regard. If courts are equipped with guidelines to direct their determination of children’s views and wishes in family law matters, this will result in a more certain, and more congruent approach and most importantly, it will assist courts to pay heed to their duty to properly hear the voice of the child.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:45:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95eb4adad63e4d518c756c18092bf44b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1466-3597
2225-7160
language Afrikaans
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:45:56Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Pretoria University Law Press
record_format Article
series De Jure
spelling doaj.art-95eb4adad63e4d518c756c18092bf44b2024-03-18T11:41:01ZafrPretoria University Law PressDe Jure1466-35972225-71602023-01-0156South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law mattersAlet Magdaleen Uys0Practising AttorneyThe United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 (CRC), the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, 1990 (ACRWC) and sections 6(5), 10, and 31(1)(a) of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 (Children’s Act) place an obligation on South African courts to determine children’s views in their parents’ family law matters. This article analyses thirteen judgments stretching from 2003 - 2020 and one 2018 psychological study in relation to parenting plans to ascertain how South African courts determine children’s views and wishes in practice. The judgments selected relate to divorces and disputes regarding children’s primary residence and care and contact (custody and access disputes), disputes where a parent intends emigrating with children, and matters were a parent abducted a child. The judgments indicate courts have diverging approaches to determining children’s views and wishes in family law matters. The 2018 psychological study found legal practitioners unfortunately fail to take into account children’s inputs for purposes of drafting their parents’ parenting plans. In light of courts’ diverging approaches to determining a child’s voice in their parents’ litigious matters, as well as the current complete lack of guidelines in this regard, there is a need to amend the Children’s Act to assist courts with particular regulations or guidelines in this regard. If courts are equipped with guidelines to direct their determination of children’s views and wishes in family law matters, this will result in a more certain, and more congruent approach and most importantly, it will assist courts to pay heed to their duty to properly hear the voice of the child.https://www.dejure.up.ac.za/uys-a-m
spellingShingle Alet Magdaleen Uys
South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law matters
De Jure
title South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law matters
title_full South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law matters
title_fullStr South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law matters
title_full_unstemmed South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law matters
title_short South African courts’ differing approaches to determining children’s views in family law matters
title_sort south african courts differing approaches to determining children s views in family law matters
url https://www.dejure.up.ac.za/uys-a-m
work_keys_str_mv AT aletmagdaleenuys southafricancourtsdifferingapproachestodeterminingchildrensviewsinfamilylawmatters