<b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121
<p class="aTitulodoArtigo">This study was carried out to evaluate the performance and carcass characteristics of bulls from three genetic groups: Zebu (ZEB), ½ Limmousin <em>vs.</em> ½ Zebu (LIZ) and ½ Angus <em>vs. </em>½ Zebu (ANZ). Bulls were finished in fe...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá
2012-05-01
|
| Series: | Acta Scientiarum: Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/15121 |
| _version_ | 1818351193507758080 |
|---|---|
| author | Rodolpho Martin do Prado Maribel Velandia Valero José Jorge dos Santos Abrahão Danielli Maggioni Ivanor Nunes do Prado Nilson Evelázio de Souza |
| author_facet | Rodolpho Martin do Prado Maribel Velandia Valero José Jorge dos Santos Abrahão Danielli Maggioni Ivanor Nunes do Prado Nilson Evelázio de Souza |
| author_sort | Rodolpho Martin do Prado |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p class="aTitulodoArtigo">This study was carried out to evaluate the performance and carcass characteristics of bulls from three genetic groups: Zebu (ZEB), ½ Limmousin <em>vs.</em> ½ Zebu (LIZ) and ½ Angus <em>vs. </em>½ Zebu (ANZ). Bulls were finished in feedlot and fed two diets: sorghum silage + 1.0% concentrate of LW or sugar cane + 1.2% concentrate LW. The bulls were slaughtered at one of two fat thicknesses: 3.4 or 4.8 mm. The bulls of the LIZ and ANZ groups showed higher FBW and ADG. There were no differences in the feed intake and carcass characteristics among the groups. Bulls from LIZ group had a lower fat thickness and higher muscle deposition. There were no differences among groups on carcass characteristics. The bulls fed with sorghum silage had a higher FBW, ADG and carcass weight than those fed sugar cane, while the animals fed sugar cane had a higher DMI and lower feed efficiency. There was no difference in hot carcass dressing between the diets. The sorghum silage or sugar cane did not change carcass characteristics or the meat composition. The FBW and HCD were similar for the two levels of fat thickness. The ADG was higher in bulls with 3.4 mm of fat thickness.</p><br><p class="aresumo">This study was carried out to evaluate the performance and carcass characteristics of bulls from three genetic groups: Zebu (ZEB), ½ Limmousin <em>vs.</em> ½ Zebu (LIZ) and ½ Angus <em>vs. </em>½ Zebu (ANZ). Bulls were finished in feedlot and fed two diets: sorghum silage + 1.0% concentrate of LW or sugar cane + 1.2% concentrate LW. The bulls were slaughtered at one of two fat thicknesses: 3.4 or 4.8 mm. The bulls of the LIZ and ANZ groups showed higher FBW and ADG. There were no differences in the feed intake and carcass characteristics among the groups. Bulls from LIZ group had a lower fat thickness and higher muscle deposition. There were no differences among groups on carcass characteristics. The bulls fed with sorghum silage had a higher FBW, ADG and carcass weight than those fed sugar cane, while the animals fed sugar cane had a higher DMI and lower feed efficiency. There was no difference in hot carcass dressing between the diets. The sorghum silage or sugar cane did not change carcass characteristics or the meat composition. The FBW and HCD were similar for the two levels of fat thickness. The ADG was higher in bulls with 3.4 mm of fat thickness.</p><p class="apalavrachave"> </p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:33:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-95f38638b58147299b628bcb9cdcdb46 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1807-8664 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:33:51Z |
| publishDate | 2012-05-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Scientiarum: Technology |
| spelling | doaj.art-95f38638b58147299b628bcb9cdcdb462022-12-21T23:35:25ZengUniversidade Estadual de MaringáActa Scientiarum: Technology1807-86642012-05-01343337344<b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121Rodolpho Martin do PradoMaribel Velandia ValeroJosé Jorge dos Santos AbrahãoDanielli MaggioniIvanor Nunes do PradoNilson Evelázio de Souza<p class="aTitulodoArtigo">This study was carried out to evaluate the performance and carcass characteristics of bulls from three genetic groups: Zebu (ZEB), ½ Limmousin <em>vs.</em> ½ Zebu (LIZ) and ½ Angus <em>vs. </em>½ Zebu (ANZ). Bulls were finished in feedlot and fed two diets: sorghum silage + 1.0% concentrate of LW or sugar cane + 1.2% concentrate LW. The bulls were slaughtered at one of two fat thicknesses: 3.4 or 4.8 mm. The bulls of the LIZ and ANZ groups showed higher FBW and ADG. There were no differences in the feed intake and carcass characteristics among the groups. Bulls from LIZ group had a lower fat thickness and higher muscle deposition. There were no differences among groups on carcass characteristics. The bulls fed with sorghum silage had a higher FBW, ADG and carcass weight than those fed sugar cane, while the animals fed sugar cane had a higher DMI and lower feed efficiency. There was no difference in hot carcass dressing between the diets. The sorghum silage or sugar cane did not change carcass characteristics or the meat composition. The FBW and HCD were similar for the two levels of fat thickness. The ADG was higher in bulls with 3.4 mm of fat thickness.</p><br><p class="aresumo">This study was carried out to evaluate the performance and carcass characteristics of bulls from three genetic groups: Zebu (ZEB), ½ Limmousin <em>vs.</em> ½ Zebu (LIZ) and ½ Angus <em>vs. </em>½ Zebu (ANZ). Bulls were finished in feedlot and fed two diets: sorghum silage + 1.0% concentrate of LW or sugar cane + 1.2% concentrate LW. The bulls were slaughtered at one of two fat thicknesses: 3.4 or 4.8 mm. The bulls of the LIZ and ANZ groups showed higher FBW and ADG. There were no differences in the feed intake and carcass characteristics among the groups. Bulls from LIZ group had a lower fat thickness and higher muscle deposition. There were no differences among groups on carcass characteristics. The bulls fed with sorghum silage had a higher FBW, ADG and carcass weight than those fed sugar cane, while the animals fed sugar cane had a higher DMI and lower feed efficiency. There was no difference in hot carcass dressing between the diets. The sorghum silage or sugar cane did not change carcass characteristics or the meat composition. The FBW and HCD were similar for the two levels of fat thickness. The ADG was higher in bulls with 3.4 mm of fat thickness.</p><p class="apalavrachave"> </p>http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/15121cattlefatgenetic groupssilagesugar cane |
| spellingShingle | Rodolpho Martin do Prado Maribel Velandia Valero José Jorge dos Santos Abrahão Danielli Maggioni Ivanor Nunes do Prado Nilson Evelázio de Souza <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 Acta Scientiarum: Technology cattle fat genetic groups silage sugar cane |
| title | <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 |
| title_full | <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 |
| title_fullStr | <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 |
| title_full_unstemmed | <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 |
| title_short | <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 <b>Meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.15121 |
| title_sort | b meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness b doi 10 4025 actascitechnol v34i3 15121 b meat quality of crossbred bulls fed with sorghum silage or sugar cane and slaughtered at two levels of fat thickness b doi 10 4025 actascitechnol v34i3 15121 |
| topic | cattle fat genetic groups silage sugar cane |
| url | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/15121 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rodolphomartindoprado bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv34i315121bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv AT maribelvelandiavalero bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv34i315121bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv AT josejorgedossantosabrahao bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv34i315121bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv AT daniellimaggioni bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv34i315121bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv AT ivanornunesdoprado bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv34i315121bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv AT nilsonevelaziodesouza bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv34i315121bmeatqualityofcrossbredbullsfedwithsorghumsilageorsugarcaneandslaughteredattwolevelsoffatthicknessbdoi104025actascitechnolv |