Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in Uganda

Abstract Background While evidence supports community health worker (CHW) capacity to improve maternal and newborn health in less-resourced countries, key implementation gaps remain. Tools for assessing CHW performance and evidence on what programmatic components affect performance are lacking. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teralynn Ludwick, Eleanor Turyakira, Teddy Kyomuhangi, Kimberly Manalili, Sheila Robinson, Jennifer L. Brenner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-02-01
Series:Human Resources for Health
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12960-018-0272-1
_version_ 1811299103892570112
author Teralynn Ludwick
Eleanor Turyakira
Teddy Kyomuhangi
Kimberly Manalili
Sheila Robinson
Jennifer L. Brenner
author_facet Teralynn Ludwick
Eleanor Turyakira
Teddy Kyomuhangi
Kimberly Manalili
Sheila Robinson
Jennifer L. Brenner
author_sort Teralynn Ludwick
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background While evidence supports community health worker (CHW) capacity to improve maternal and newborn health in less-resourced countries, key implementation gaps remain. Tools for assessing CHW performance and evidence on what programmatic components affect performance are lacking. This study developed and tested a qualitative evaluative framework and tool to assess CHW team performance in a district program in rural Uganda. Methods A new assessment framework was developed to collect and analyze qualitative evidence based on CHW perspectives on seven program components associated with effectiveness (selection; training; community embeddedness; peer support; supportive supervision; relationship with other healthcare workers; retention and incentive structures). Focus groups were conducted with four high/medium-performing CHW teams and four low-performing CHW teams selected through random, stratified sampling. Content analysis involved organizing focus group transcripts according to the seven program effectiveness components, and assigning scores to each component per focus group. Results Four components, ‘supportive supervision’, ‘good relationships with other healthcare workers’, ‘peer support’, and ‘retention and incentive structures’ received the lowest overall scores. Variances in scores between ‘high’/‘medium’- and ‘low’-performing CHW teams were largest for ‘supportive supervision’ and ‘good relationships with other healthcare workers.’ Our analysis suggests that in the Bushenyi intervention context, CHW team performance is highly correlated with the quality of supervision and relationships with other healthcare workers. CHWs identified key performance-related issues of absentee supervisors, referral system challenges, and lack of engagement/respect by health workers. Other less-correlated program components warrant further study and may have been impacted by relatively consistent program implementation within our limited study area. Conclusions Applying process-oriented measurement tools are needed to better understand CHW performance-related factors and build a supportive environment for CHW program effectiveness and sustainability. Findings from a qualitative, multi-component tool developed and applied in this study suggest that factors related to (1) supportive supervision and (2) relationships with other healthcare workers may be strongly associated with variances in performance outcomes within a program. Careful consideration of supervisory structure and health worker orientation during program implementation are among strategies proposed to increase CHW performance.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:31:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9614f5c7c82c4837aeee0a4f5c62d848
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1478-4491
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:31:10Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Human Resources for Health
spelling doaj.art-9614f5c7c82c4837aeee0a4f5c62d8482022-12-22T02:58:10ZengBMCHuman Resources for Health1478-44912018-02-011611810.1186/s12960-018-0272-1Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in UgandaTeralynn Ludwick0Eleanor Turyakira1Teddy Kyomuhangi2Kimberly Manalili3Sheila Robinson4Jennifer L. Brenner5School of Public Health, University of AlbertaDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyMaternal, Newborn, and Child Health Institute, Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryPediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryAbstract Background While evidence supports community health worker (CHW) capacity to improve maternal and newborn health in less-resourced countries, key implementation gaps remain. Tools for assessing CHW performance and evidence on what programmatic components affect performance are lacking. This study developed and tested a qualitative evaluative framework and tool to assess CHW team performance in a district program in rural Uganda. Methods A new assessment framework was developed to collect and analyze qualitative evidence based on CHW perspectives on seven program components associated with effectiveness (selection; training; community embeddedness; peer support; supportive supervision; relationship with other healthcare workers; retention and incentive structures). Focus groups were conducted with four high/medium-performing CHW teams and four low-performing CHW teams selected through random, stratified sampling. Content analysis involved organizing focus group transcripts according to the seven program effectiveness components, and assigning scores to each component per focus group. Results Four components, ‘supportive supervision’, ‘good relationships with other healthcare workers’, ‘peer support’, and ‘retention and incentive structures’ received the lowest overall scores. Variances in scores between ‘high’/‘medium’- and ‘low’-performing CHW teams were largest for ‘supportive supervision’ and ‘good relationships with other healthcare workers.’ Our analysis suggests that in the Bushenyi intervention context, CHW team performance is highly correlated with the quality of supervision and relationships with other healthcare workers. CHWs identified key performance-related issues of absentee supervisors, referral system challenges, and lack of engagement/respect by health workers. Other less-correlated program components warrant further study and may have been impacted by relatively consistent program implementation within our limited study area. Conclusions Applying process-oriented measurement tools are needed to better understand CHW performance-related factors and build a supportive environment for CHW program effectiveness and sustainability. Findings from a qualitative, multi-component tool developed and applied in this study suggest that factors related to (1) supportive supervision and (2) relationships with other healthcare workers may be strongly associated with variances in performance outcomes within a program. Careful consideration of supervisory structure and health worker orientation during program implementation are among strategies proposed to increase CHW performance.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12960-018-0272-1
spellingShingle Teralynn Ludwick
Eleanor Turyakira
Teddy Kyomuhangi
Kimberly Manalili
Sheila Robinson
Jennifer L. Brenner
Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in Uganda
Human Resources for Health
title Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in Uganda
title_full Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in Uganda
title_fullStr Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in Uganda
title_short Supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support CHW performance: Use of a qualitative framework to evaluate CHW programming in Uganda
title_sort supportive supervision and constructive relationships with healthcare workers support chw performance use of a qualitative framework to evaluate chw programming in uganda
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12960-018-0272-1
work_keys_str_mv AT teralynnludwick supportivesupervisionandconstructiverelationshipswithhealthcareworkerssupportchwperformanceuseofaqualitativeframeworktoevaluatechwprogramminginuganda
AT eleanorturyakira supportivesupervisionandconstructiverelationshipswithhealthcareworkerssupportchwperformanceuseofaqualitativeframeworktoevaluatechwprogramminginuganda
AT teddykyomuhangi supportivesupervisionandconstructiverelationshipswithhealthcareworkerssupportchwperformanceuseofaqualitativeframeworktoevaluatechwprogramminginuganda
AT kimberlymanalili supportivesupervisionandconstructiverelationshipswithhealthcareworkerssupportchwperformanceuseofaqualitativeframeworktoevaluatechwprogramminginuganda
AT sheilarobinson supportivesupervisionandconstructiverelationshipswithhealthcareworkerssupportchwperformanceuseofaqualitativeframeworktoevaluatechwprogramminginuganda
AT jenniferlbrenner supportivesupervisionandconstructiverelationshipswithhealthcareworkerssupportchwperformanceuseofaqualitativeframeworktoevaluatechwprogramminginuganda