Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies
Abstract Background Nutrition and physical activity policies have the potential to influence lifestyle patterns and reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases. In the world of health-related guidelines, GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is the most widely...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Implementation Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-020-00984-2 |
_version_ | 1818149546057793536 |
---|---|
author | Jasmin Zähringer Lukas Schwingshackl Ani Movsisyan Jan M. Stratil Sara Capacci Jürgen M. Steinacker Sarah Forberger Wolfgang Ahrens Daniela Küllenberg de Gaudry Holger J. Schünemann Joerg J. Meerpohl On behalf of the PEN consortium |
author_facet | Jasmin Zähringer Lukas Schwingshackl Ani Movsisyan Jan M. Stratil Sara Capacci Jürgen M. Steinacker Sarah Forberger Wolfgang Ahrens Daniela Küllenberg de Gaudry Holger J. Schünemann Joerg J. Meerpohl On behalf of the PEN consortium |
author_sort | Jasmin Zähringer |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Nutrition and physical activity policies have the potential to influence lifestyle patterns and reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases. In the world of health-related guidelines, GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is the most widely used approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of recommendations. Thus, it is relevant to explore its usefulness also in the process of nutrition and physical activity policymaking and evaluation. The purpose of this scoping review was (i) to generate an exemplary overview of documents using the GRADE approach in the process of nutrition and physical activity policymaking and evaluation, (ii) to find out how the GRADE approach has been applied, and (iii) to explore which facilitators of and barriers to the use of GRADE have been described on the basis of the identified documents. The overarching aim of this work is to work towards improving the process of evidence-informed policymaking in the areas of dietary behavior, physical activity, and sedentary behavior. Methods A scoping review was conducted according to current reporting standards. MEDLINE via Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched up until 4 July 2019. Documents describing a body of evidence which was assessed for the development or evaluation of a policy, including documents labeled as “guidelines,” or systematic reviews used to inform policymaking were included. Results Thirty-six documents were included. Overall, 313 GRADE certainty of evidence ratings were identified in systematic reviews and guidelines; the strength of recommendations/policies was assessed in four documents, and six documents mentioned facilitators or barriers for the use of GRADE. The major reported barrier was the initial low starting level of a body of evidence from non-randomized studies when assessing the certainty of evidence. Conclusion This scoping review found that the GRADE approach has been used for policy evaluations, in the evaluation of the effectiveness of policy-relevant interventions (policymaking), as well as in the development of guidelines intended to guide policymaking. Several areas for future research were identified to explore the use of GRADE in health policymaking and evaluation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T13:08:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9622a93ddcaa452098016f8915e733d9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1748-5908 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T13:08:45Z |
publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Implementation Science |
spelling | doaj.art-9622a93ddcaa452098016f8915e733d92022-12-22T01:06:15ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082020-05-0115111810.1186/s13012-020-00984-2Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policiesJasmin Zähringer0Lukas Schwingshackl1Ani Movsisyan2Jan M. Stratil3Sara Capacci4Jürgen M. Steinacker5Sarah Forberger6Wolfgang Ahrens7Daniela Küllenberg de Gaudry8Holger J. Schünemann9Joerg J. Meerpohl10On behalf of the PEN consortiumInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU MunichInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU MunichDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of BolognaDivision of Sports- and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Center, Ulm University HospitalDepartment Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPSDepartment Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPSInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgMcMaster GRADE Centre and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences CentreInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of FreiburgAbstract Background Nutrition and physical activity policies have the potential to influence lifestyle patterns and reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases. In the world of health-related guidelines, GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is the most widely used approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of recommendations. Thus, it is relevant to explore its usefulness also in the process of nutrition and physical activity policymaking and evaluation. The purpose of this scoping review was (i) to generate an exemplary overview of documents using the GRADE approach in the process of nutrition and physical activity policymaking and evaluation, (ii) to find out how the GRADE approach has been applied, and (iii) to explore which facilitators of and barriers to the use of GRADE have been described on the basis of the identified documents. The overarching aim of this work is to work towards improving the process of evidence-informed policymaking in the areas of dietary behavior, physical activity, and sedentary behavior. Methods A scoping review was conducted according to current reporting standards. MEDLINE via Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched up until 4 July 2019. Documents describing a body of evidence which was assessed for the development or evaluation of a policy, including documents labeled as “guidelines,” or systematic reviews used to inform policymaking were included. Results Thirty-six documents were included. Overall, 313 GRADE certainty of evidence ratings were identified in systematic reviews and guidelines; the strength of recommendations/policies was assessed in four documents, and six documents mentioned facilitators or barriers for the use of GRADE. The major reported barrier was the initial low starting level of a body of evidence from non-randomized studies when assessing the certainty of evidence. Conclusion This scoping review found that the GRADE approach has been used for policy evaluations, in the evaluation of the effectiveness of policy-relevant interventions (policymaking), as well as in the development of guidelines intended to guide policymaking. Several areas for future research were identified to explore the use of GRADE in health policymaking and evaluation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-020-00984-2Policy evaluationGRADEEvidence-basedNutritionPhysical activityHealth policymaking |
spellingShingle | Jasmin Zähringer Lukas Schwingshackl Ani Movsisyan Jan M. Stratil Sara Capacci Jürgen M. Steinacker Sarah Forberger Wolfgang Ahrens Daniela Küllenberg de Gaudry Holger J. Schünemann Joerg J. Meerpohl On behalf of the PEN consortium Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies Implementation Science Policy evaluation GRADE Evidence-based Nutrition Physical activity Health policymaking |
title | Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies |
title_full | Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies |
title_fullStr | Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies |
title_short | Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies |
title_sort | use of the grade approach in health policymaking and evaluation a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies |
topic | Policy evaluation GRADE Evidence-based Nutrition Physical activity Health policymaking |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-020-00984-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jasminzahringer useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT lukasschwingshackl useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT animovsisyan useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT janmstratil useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT saracapacci useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT jurgenmsteinacker useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT sarahforberger useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT wolfgangahrens useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT danielakullenbergdegaudry useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT holgerjschunemann useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT joergjmeerpohl useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies AT onbehalfofthepenconsortium useofthegradeapproachinhealthpolicymakingandevaluationascopingreviewofnutritionandphysicalactivitypolicies |