When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis

Introduction: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders that results in peripheral blood (PB) cytopenias and bone marrow (BM) dysplasia. Dysplasia is the hallmark of the disorder, and must exceed the threshold of 10%. Conventional karyo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aline dos Santos Borgo Perazzio, Maria de Lourdes L. Ferrari Chauffaille
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137919300872
_version_ 1818281843686899712
author Aline dos Santos Borgo Perazzio
Maria de Lourdes L. Ferrari Chauffaille
author_facet Aline dos Santos Borgo Perazzio
Maria de Lourdes L. Ferrari Chauffaille
author_sort Aline dos Santos Borgo Perazzio
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders that results in peripheral blood (PB) cytopenias and bone marrow (BM) dysplasia. Dysplasia is the hallmark of the disorder, and must exceed the threshold of 10%. Conventional karyotype (KT) has a role in the classification and prognostication of subtypes. In daily practice, many cases are diagnosed in face of exuberant clinical complains, but cases with dismal evidences pose real difficulties to definitively conclude the case. Material and methods: The objective of this study is to detect cases in which no morphology evidence of dysplasia or increased blasts were observed but KT was decisive for MDS diagnosis. 666 cases were admitted to rule out MDS. Results: There were found 5 (0.75%) cases who presented no evident dysplasia morphology or whose dysplasia was borderline but the karyotype was decisive because showed clonal evidence. The karyotype was: case 1: 46,XY,del(5q)(q13q33),del(11)(q13q23)[7]/46,XY[13]; case 2: 46,XX,del(11)(q21q23)[20]; case 3: 46,XX,del(7)(q22q34)[4]/46,XX[8]; case 4: 47,XX,del(5)(q13q33),+mar[12]/46,XX[8] and case 5: 46,XXt(2;11)(p21;q24),del(4)(?q25),del(21)(q22)[14]/46,XX[6]. Conclusion: Patients with cytopenia and insufficient or borderline evidence of dysplasia may experience a long journey before a MDS diagnosis is made. Cytogenetics studies may abbreviate this pathway when clonal aberrations considered presumptive of MDS are detected. This study shows that karyotype should still be considered as a diagnostic tool. Keywords: Myelodysplastic syndromes, Karyotype, Diagnosis
first_indexed 2024-12-13T00:11:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9630dda7c4f6495a8906c72369818262
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2531-1379
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T00:11:34Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
spelling doaj.art-9630dda7c4f6495a8906c723698182622022-12-22T00:05:58ZengElsevierHematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy2531-13792019-10-01414371373When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosisAline dos Santos Borgo Perazzio0Maria de Lourdes L. Ferrari Chauffaille1Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Fleury –, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Fleury –, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Corresponding author at: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), Disciplina de Hematologia, Rua Doutor Diogo de Faria, 824, 5o andar São Paulo, SP CEP: 04023-062, Brazil.Introduction: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders that results in peripheral blood (PB) cytopenias and bone marrow (BM) dysplasia. Dysplasia is the hallmark of the disorder, and must exceed the threshold of 10%. Conventional karyotype (KT) has a role in the classification and prognostication of subtypes. In daily practice, many cases are diagnosed in face of exuberant clinical complains, but cases with dismal evidences pose real difficulties to definitively conclude the case. Material and methods: The objective of this study is to detect cases in which no morphology evidence of dysplasia or increased blasts were observed but KT was decisive for MDS diagnosis. 666 cases were admitted to rule out MDS. Results: There were found 5 (0.75%) cases who presented no evident dysplasia morphology or whose dysplasia was borderline but the karyotype was decisive because showed clonal evidence. The karyotype was: case 1: 46,XY,del(5q)(q13q33),del(11)(q13q23)[7]/46,XY[13]; case 2: 46,XX,del(11)(q21q23)[20]; case 3: 46,XX,del(7)(q22q34)[4]/46,XX[8]; case 4: 47,XX,del(5)(q13q33),+mar[12]/46,XX[8] and case 5: 46,XXt(2;11)(p21;q24),del(4)(?q25),del(21)(q22)[14]/46,XX[6]. Conclusion: Patients with cytopenia and insufficient or borderline evidence of dysplasia may experience a long journey before a MDS diagnosis is made. Cytogenetics studies may abbreviate this pathway when clonal aberrations considered presumptive of MDS are detected. This study shows that karyotype should still be considered as a diagnostic tool. Keywords: Myelodysplastic syndromes, Karyotype, Diagnosishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137919300872
spellingShingle Aline dos Santos Borgo Perazzio
Maria de Lourdes L. Ferrari Chauffaille
When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
title When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis
title_full When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis
title_fullStr When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis
title_short When karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis
title_sort when karyotype is decisive for myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137919300872
work_keys_str_mv AT alinedossantosborgoperazzio whenkaryotypeisdecisiveformyelodysplasticsyndromesdiagnosis
AT mariadelourdeslferrarichauffaille whenkaryotypeisdecisiveformyelodysplasticsyndromesdiagnosis