(Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context

Prior literature suggests that, among the so-called ‘developed economies’, residing in urban contexts is associated with lower life satisfaction. Using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) and Eurostat, we contribute to this literature by focusing on three different indicators of urbanity (sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikko Weckroth, Teemu Kemppainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Regional Studies, Regional Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1925146
_version_ 1818966927633022976
author Mikko Weckroth
Teemu Kemppainen
author_facet Mikko Weckroth
Teemu Kemppainen
author_sort Mikko Weckroth
collection DOAJ
description Prior literature suggests that, among the so-called ‘developed economies’, residing in urban contexts is associated with lower life satisfaction. Using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) and Eurostat, we contribute to this literature by focusing on three different indicators of urbanity (subjective domicile, population density and living in a dominant urban region) in a multilevel modelling context in order to define where exactly the relatively lower life satisfaction can be found. Moreover, we account for the level of economic development at both regional and national levels. The results show that subjective domicile is strongly associated with life satisfaction, whereas regional gross domestic product (GDP) and other urbanity indicators are insignificant. Our results also highlight the relatively higher life satisfaction in rural surroundings in more developed countries. We conclude by noting that future contributions to the literature on urban–rural life satisfaction differences should utilize panel data, making it possible to address the spatial sorting versus contextual effects debate, and focus on investigating the higher level determinants at the country level that define the existence of urban–rural differences in life satisfaction within a country.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T13:40:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9643b3b6127e43218044e23d38a476c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2168-1376
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T13:40:41Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Regional Studies, Regional Science
spelling doaj.art-9643b3b6127e43218044e23d38a476c82022-12-21T19:38:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRegional Studies, Regional Science2168-13762021-01-018120722710.1080/21681376.2021.19251461925146(Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional contextMikko Weckroth0Teemu Kemppainen1University of HelsinkiUniversity of HelsinkiPrior literature suggests that, among the so-called ‘developed economies’, residing in urban contexts is associated with lower life satisfaction. Using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) and Eurostat, we contribute to this literature by focusing on three different indicators of urbanity (subjective domicile, population density and living in a dominant urban region) in a multilevel modelling context in order to define where exactly the relatively lower life satisfaction can be found. Moreover, we account for the level of economic development at both regional and national levels. The results show that subjective domicile is strongly associated with life satisfaction, whereas regional gross domestic product (GDP) and other urbanity indicators are insignificant. Our results also highlight the relatively higher life satisfaction in rural surroundings in more developed countries. We conclude by noting that future contributions to the literature on urban–rural life satisfaction differences should utilize panel data, making it possible to address the spatial sorting versus contextual effects debate, and focus on investigating the higher level determinants at the country level that define the existence of urban–rural differences in life satisfaction within a country.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1925146life satisfactionurban–rural differencessubjective well-beingeconomic development
spellingShingle Mikko Weckroth
Teemu Kemppainen
(Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context
Regional Studies, Regional Science
life satisfaction
urban–rural differences
subjective well-being
economic development
title (Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context
title_full (Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context
title_fullStr (Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context
title_full_unstemmed (Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context
title_short (Un)Happiness, where are you? Evaluating the relationship between urbanity, life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context
title_sort un happiness where are you evaluating the relationship between urbanity life satisfaction and economic development in a regional context
topic life satisfaction
urban–rural differences
subjective well-being
economic development
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1925146
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkoweckroth unhappinesswhereareyouevaluatingtherelationshipbetweenurbanitylifesatisfactionandeconomicdevelopmentinaregionalcontext
AT teemukemppainen unhappinesswhereareyouevaluatingtherelationshipbetweenurbanitylifesatisfactionandeconomicdevelopmentinaregionalcontext