Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?
We conducted additional analyses of Pennycook et al.’s (2015, Study 2) data to investigate the possibility that there would be ideological differences in “bullshit receptivity” that would be explained by individual differences in cognitive style and ability. As hypothesized, we observed that endorse...
Main Authors: | Joanna Sterling, John T. Jost, Gordon Pennycook |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16305/jdm16305.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?
by: Joanna Sterling, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
It’s still bullshit:
Reply to Dalton (2016)
by: Gordon Pennycook, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Political Bullshit Receptivity and its Correlates: A Cross-Country Validation of the Concept
by: Vukašin Gligorić, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Bullshit for you;
transcendence for me. A commentary on "On the reception and detection of
pseudo-profound bullshit"
by: Craig Dalton
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Finding meaning in
the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound
bullshit
by: Alexander C. Walker, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)