Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
J Morgan Micheletti,1 Nicole B Duncan,2 Brad Hall3 1Berkeley Eye Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; 3Sengi, Penniac, NB, CanadaCorrespondence: J Morgan Micheletti, Berkele...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Clinical Ophthalmology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/head-to-head-comparison-of-intermediate-vision-of-two-monofocal-intrao-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH |
| _version_ | 1827576719011217408 |
|---|---|
| author | Micheletti JM Duncan NB Hall B |
| author_facet | Micheletti JM Duncan NB Hall B |
| author_sort | Micheletti JM |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | J Morgan Micheletti,1 Nicole B Duncan,2 Brad Hall3 1Berkeley Eye Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; 3Sengi, Penniac, NB, CanadaCorrespondence: J Morgan Micheletti, Berkeley Eye Center 3100 Weslayan, Suite 400, Houston, TX, 77027, USA, Tel +1-713-526-1600, Email morgan.micheletti@berkeleyeye.comPurpose: To compare intermediate visual outcomes in patients previously implanted with bilateral Clareon monofocal IOLs versus bilateral Eyhance IOLs.Methods: This was a non-interventional, single-center, examiner-masked, comparative study. Participants were cataract patients presenting at least 3 months after uncomplicated, bilateral implantation of either Clareon or Eyhance non-toric and toric IOLs. Outcomes measures included binocular distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), binocular best-corrected defocus curve, postoperative mean residual spherical equivalent (MRSE), and residual astigmatism.Results: A total of 620 eyes of 310 subjects (155 subjects per group) were evaluated. The mean difference in DCIVA was 0.05 logMAR between the Eyhance and Clareon IOLs which was significant (p < 0.01), but within the 0.1 logMAR non-inferiority margin. Mean CDVA of the Clareon group was 0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR compared to 0.02 ± 0.03 logMAR of the Eyhance Group (p > 0.05). Defocus curves from +1.0 D to – 3.0 D were not clinically nor statistically different between the Clareon and Eyhance groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study show that bilateral implantation of Clareon monofocal IOLs and Eyhance monofocal IOLs lead to similar distance and intermediate visual outcomes.Plain Language Summary: The natural lens inside the eye can become opaque. Cataract surgery removes this lens and replaces it with an artificial intraocular lens (IOL). The most often used type of intraocular lenses are monofocal lenses. These lenses provide clear vision for viewing distant objects. Increasing attention is also being paid to how these monofocal lenses perform for viewing objects at intermediate distances (such as using a digital device). The purpose of this study was to compare visual outcomes in patients with bilateral implantation of two different types of monofocal lenses, one of which was specifically designed to increase depth of focus. The results of this study suggest that implantation with these monofocal IOLs led to similar visual outcomes and that both monofocal IOLs may provide a similar potential to improve vision at the intermediate range.Keywords: Clareon, Eyhance, monofocal, intermediate visual acuity |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:16:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-96680753532d4980b2bd26974a129984 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1177-5483 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:16:27Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Clinical Ophthalmology |
| spelling | doaj.art-96680753532d4980b2bd26974a1299842023-12-21T17:27:36ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832023-12-01Volume 173983399089223Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular LensesMicheletti JMDuncan NBHall BJ Morgan Micheletti,1 Nicole B Duncan,2 Brad Hall3 1Berkeley Eye Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; 3Sengi, Penniac, NB, CanadaCorrespondence: J Morgan Micheletti, Berkeley Eye Center 3100 Weslayan, Suite 400, Houston, TX, 77027, USA, Tel +1-713-526-1600, Email morgan.micheletti@berkeleyeye.comPurpose: To compare intermediate visual outcomes in patients previously implanted with bilateral Clareon monofocal IOLs versus bilateral Eyhance IOLs.Methods: This was a non-interventional, single-center, examiner-masked, comparative study. Participants were cataract patients presenting at least 3 months after uncomplicated, bilateral implantation of either Clareon or Eyhance non-toric and toric IOLs. Outcomes measures included binocular distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), binocular best-corrected defocus curve, postoperative mean residual spherical equivalent (MRSE), and residual astigmatism.Results: A total of 620 eyes of 310 subjects (155 subjects per group) were evaluated. The mean difference in DCIVA was 0.05 logMAR between the Eyhance and Clareon IOLs which was significant (p < 0.01), but within the 0.1 logMAR non-inferiority margin. Mean CDVA of the Clareon group was 0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR compared to 0.02 ± 0.03 logMAR of the Eyhance Group (p > 0.05). Defocus curves from +1.0 D to – 3.0 D were not clinically nor statistically different between the Clareon and Eyhance groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study show that bilateral implantation of Clareon monofocal IOLs and Eyhance monofocal IOLs lead to similar distance and intermediate visual outcomes.Plain Language Summary: The natural lens inside the eye can become opaque. Cataract surgery removes this lens and replaces it with an artificial intraocular lens (IOL). The most often used type of intraocular lenses are monofocal lenses. These lenses provide clear vision for viewing distant objects. Increasing attention is also being paid to how these monofocal lenses perform for viewing objects at intermediate distances (such as using a digital device). The purpose of this study was to compare visual outcomes in patients with bilateral implantation of two different types of monofocal lenses, one of which was specifically designed to increase depth of focus. The results of this study suggest that implantation with these monofocal IOLs led to similar visual outcomes and that both monofocal IOLs may provide a similar potential to improve vision at the intermediate range.Keywords: Clareon, Eyhance, monofocal, intermediate visual acuityhttps://www.dovepress.com/head-to-head-comparison-of-intermediate-vision-of-two-monofocal-intrao-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTHclareoneyhancemonofocalintermediate visual acuity |
| spellingShingle | Micheletti JM Duncan NB Hall B Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses Clinical Ophthalmology clareon eyhance monofocal intermediate visual acuity |
| title | Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_full | Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_fullStr | Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_short | Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses |
| title_sort | head to head comparison of intermediate vision of two monofocal intraocular lenses |
| topic | clareon eyhance monofocal intermediate visual acuity |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/head-to-head-comparison-of-intermediate-vision-of-two-monofocal-intrao-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michelettijm headtoheadcomparisonofintermediatevisionoftwomonofocalintraocularlenses AT duncannb headtoheadcomparisonofintermediatevisionoftwomonofocalintraocularlenses AT hallb headtoheadcomparisonofintermediatevisionoftwomonofocalintraocularlenses |