Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance Evaluation
[Purpose/Significance] This paper analyzes and compares the application direction and development trend of the existing domestic and foreign research theories and methods related to the performance evaluation of science and technology policy, so as to provide reference for the performance evaluation...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Department of Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Nongye tushu qingbao xuebao |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://nytsqb.aiijournal.com/fileup/1002-1248/PDF/1002-1248-2021-6-30.pdf |
_version_ | 1828134861391527936 |
---|---|
author | ZHANG Min, CHEN Yunwei |
author_facet | ZHANG Min, CHEN Yunwei |
author_sort | ZHANG Min, CHEN Yunwei |
collection | DOAJ |
description | [Purpose/Significance] This paper analyzes and compares the application direction and development trend of the existing domestic and foreign research theories and methods related to the performance evaluation of science and technology policy, so as to provide reference for the performance evaluation of science and technology policy. [Method/Process] This paper summarizes the origin and development of the performance evaluation of science and technology policy, the application of theoretical methods and models, and the use of metrological evaluation methods. It summarizes the stages of the development of science and technology policy evaluation, compares the characteristics of different theoretical methods, discusses the shortcomings of existing research and prospects the future development. [Results/Conclusions] The existing researches on the performance evaluation of science and technology policy mainly refer to the relevant methods of metrology in the use of methods and models, and combine with the characteristics of policy evaluation to improve, focusing on the use of quantitative methods and the construction of models. Suggestions: (1) The performance evaluation of science and technology policy should be diversified. (2) The performance evaluation methods of science and technology policy need to be diversified. (3) The performance evaluation process of science and technology policy should be intelligent. (4) The credibility of science and technology policy performance evaluation results needs to be improved. In the future, we can choose different evaluation methods according to different types and fields of policies. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T17:40:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-966b184ca69f4400b617439de6a2139d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1002-1248 |
language | zho |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T17:40:05Z |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | Editorial Department of Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture |
record_format | Article |
series | Nongye tushu qingbao xuebao |
spelling | doaj.art-966b184ca69f4400b617439de6a2139d2022-12-22T04:11:30ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Library and Information Science in AgricultureNongye tushu qingbao xuebao1002-12482021-06-01336303910.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0391Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance EvaluationZHANG Min, CHEN Yunwei01. Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041; ;2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190[Purpose/Significance] This paper analyzes and compares the application direction and development trend of the existing domestic and foreign research theories and methods related to the performance evaluation of science and technology policy, so as to provide reference for the performance evaluation of science and technology policy. [Method/Process] This paper summarizes the origin and development of the performance evaluation of science and technology policy, the application of theoretical methods and models, and the use of metrological evaluation methods. It summarizes the stages of the development of science and technology policy evaluation, compares the characteristics of different theoretical methods, discusses the shortcomings of existing research and prospects the future development. [Results/Conclusions] The existing researches on the performance evaluation of science and technology policy mainly refer to the relevant methods of metrology in the use of methods and models, and combine with the characteristics of policy evaluation to improve, focusing on the use of quantitative methods and the construction of models. Suggestions: (1) The performance evaluation of science and technology policy should be diversified. (2) The performance evaluation methods of science and technology policy need to be diversified. (3) The performance evaluation process of science and technology policy should be intelligent. (4) The credibility of science and technology policy performance evaluation results needs to be improved. In the future, we can choose different evaluation methods according to different types and fields of policies.http://nytsqb.aiijournal.com/fileup/1002-1248/PDF/1002-1248-2021-6-30.pdfscience and technology policy|performance|evaluation |
spellingShingle | ZHANG Min, CHEN Yunwei Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance Evaluation Nongye tushu qingbao xuebao science and technology policy|performance|evaluation |
title | Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance Evaluation |
title_full | Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance Evaluation |
title_short | Review on the Theory, Method and Model of Policy Performance Evaluation |
title_sort | review on the theory method and model of policy performance evaluation |
topic | science and technology policy|performance|evaluation |
url | http://nytsqb.aiijournal.com/fileup/1002-1248/PDF/1002-1248-2021-6-30.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangminchenyunwei reviewonthetheorymethodandmodelofpolicyperformanceevaluation |