Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers

Aim: The objective of the study was to assess the performance of CT Perfusion in comparison to CECT for preoperative detection of metastases to lymph nodes in squamous cell cancers of oral cavity. Methods: Twenty-five patients with squamous cell cancers of oral cavity underwent CECT and CTP. Two rad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shubham Suryavanshi, Jyoti Kumar, Alpana Manchanda, Ishwar Singh, Nita Khurana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:European Journal of Radiology Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047721000198
_version_ 1819095329872543744
author Shubham Suryavanshi
Jyoti Kumar
Alpana Manchanda
Ishwar Singh
Nita Khurana
author_facet Shubham Suryavanshi
Jyoti Kumar
Alpana Manchanda
Ishwar Singh
Nita Khurana
author_sort Shubham Suryavanshi
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The objective of the study was to assess the performance of CT Perfusion in comparison to CECT for preoperative detection of metastases to lymph nodes in squamous cell cancers of oral cavity. Methods: Twenty-five patients with squamous cell cancers of oral cavity underwent CECT and CTP. Two radiologists evaluated CECT and CTP parameters independently. Surgery and post-operative histopathology was performed in all patients. Results: Level wise analysis of the largest node was done. 102 lymph nodes on CECT and 82 lymph nodes on CTP were correlated with post-operative histopathological findings. CECT had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 75 %, 98.6 % and 91.2 %(p-value <0.001) respectively in differentiating benign from metastatic nodes. Mean transit time[MTT] was significantly the most accurate CTP parameter and carried a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 90.5 %, 93.4 %, 92.7 % and 0.96 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of MTT was higher than the sensitivity of overall CECT. Conclusions: CTP is a promising tool for detection of metastatic cervical nodes in squamous cell cancers of the oral cavity.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T23:41:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-966cfa9c269b47a38e343b2357a911b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-0477
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T23:41:35Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series European Journal of Radiology Open
spelling doaj.art-966cfa9c269b47a38e343b2357a911b92022-12-21T18:46:13ZengElsevierEuropean Journal of Radiology Open2352-04772021-01-018100339Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancersShubham Suryavanshi0Jyoti Kumar1Alpana Manchanda2Ishwar Singh3Nita Khurana4Department of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College &amp; Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College &amp; Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, Delhi, India; Corresponding author at: Maulana Azad Medical College &amp; Associated Hospitals, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, 110002, New Delhi-Central, Delhi, India.Department of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College &amp; Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College &amp; Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, Delhi, IndiaDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College &amp; Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, Delhi, IndiaAim: The objective of the study was to assess the performance of CT Perfusion in comparison to CECT for preoperative detection of metastases to lymph nodes in squamous cell cancers of oral cavity. Methods: Twenty-five patients with squamous cell cancers of oral cavity underwent CECT and CTP. Two radiologists evaluated CECT and CTP parameters independently. Surgery and post-operative histopathology was performed in all patients. Results: Level wise analysis of the largest node was done. 102 lymph nodes on CECT and 82 lymph nodes on CTP were correlated with post-operative histopathological findings. CECT had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 75 %, 98.6 % and 91.2 %(p-value <0.001) respectively in differentiating benign from metastatic nodes. Mean transit time[MTT] was significantly the most accurate CTP parameter and carried a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 90.5 %, 93.4 %, 92.7 % and 0.96 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of MTT was higher than the sensitivity of overall CECT. Conclusions: CTP is a promising tool for detection of metastatic cervical nodes in squamous cell cancers of the oral cavity.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047721000198CT perfusionCECTSquamous cell cancerLymph nodes
spellingShingle Shubham Suryavanshi
Jyoti Kumar
Alpana Manchanda
Ishwar Singh
Nita Khurana
Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
European Journal of Radiology Open
CT perfusion
CECT
Squamous cell cancer
Lymph nodes
title Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_full Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_fullStr Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_short Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_sort comparison of cect and ct perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
topic CT perfusion
CECT
Squamous cell cancer
Lymph nodes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047721000198
work_keys_str_mv AT shubhamsuryavanshi comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT jyotikumar comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT alpanamanchanda comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT ishwarsingh comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT nitakhurana comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers