Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus)
Abstract Understanding pathogen spread in wildlife has important implications for conservation and management efforts. This is particularly the case for taxa that are susceptible to disease spillover events resulting in outbreaks and rapid population declines, such as carnivores. However, assessment...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Ecosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1558 |
_version_ | 1828492435705036800 |
---|---|
author | Marie L. J. Gilbertson Scott Carver Sue VandeWoude Kevin R. Crooks Michael R. Lappin Meggan E. Craft |
author_facet | Marie L. J. Gilbertson Scott Carver Sue VandeWoude Kevin R. Crooks Michael R. Lappin Meggan E. Craft |
author_sort | Marie L. J. Gilbertson |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Understanding pathogen spread in wildlife has important implications for conservation and management efforts. This is particularly the case for taxa that are susceptible to disease spillover events resulting in outbreaks and rapid population declines, such as carnivores. However, assessment of the spatial structure of pathogen exposure (pathogen spatial autocorrelation) is relatively rare for these kinds of taxa. Structure in pathogen exposure may reflect a number of important features, including host traits, pathogen traits, and detection methods utilized. The relatively wide‐ranging nature of many carnivores may lead to rapid pathogen spread and obfuscate any spatial autocorrelation being detectable, but this has not yet been explicitly evaluated. Here, we tested for evidence of spatial structuring of pathogen exposure and coexposures for puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus), both mobile and wide‐ranging felid species. The study included 440 puma and 639 bobcat from six study regions (one in Florida, two in Colorado, and three in California), as well as each animal's capture location and exposure status for up to eight pathogens. This allowed a thorough examination of spatial patterns of pathogen exposure across different pathogen transmission types, different habitats, and different host ecology. We tested for spatial autocorrelation for each pathogen in each host species at each site, as well as both host species combined. In addition, we tested for coexposure between all pathogens in the study, and for those pathogens that were correlated, we tested for spatial clusters of coexposure. We detected spatial autocorrelation in exposure status for approximately 2% and 10% of examined cases for puma and bobcats, respectively, and spatial clustering in approximately 17% of cases where pathogen coexposures were detected. These results suggest that wide‐ranging species, such as puma and bobcat, may rapidly disseminate pathogens across their populations, precluding substantive detection of autocorrelation in pathogen exposure by traditional serological and infection detection methods. Thus, targeted pathogen surveillance or control might focus on individual host characteristics, and advances in understanding pathogen spread in these secretive felids may necessitate examinations of spatial structure in both pathogen and host genetics. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T11:21:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9683f774ea01402aa31ecc71475d0781 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2150-8925 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T11:21:23Z |
publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Ecosphere |
spelling | doaj.art-9683f774ea01402aa31ecc71475d07812022-12-22T01:09:10ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252016-11-01711n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.1558Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus)Marie L. J. Gilbertson0Scott Carver1Sue VandeWoude2Kevin R. Crooks3Michael R. Lappin4Meggan E. Craft5Department of Veterinary Population Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota 55455 USASchool of Biological Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania 7001 AustraliaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523 USADepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523 USADepartment of Clinical Sciences Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523 USADepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota 55455 USAAbstract Understanding pathogen spread in wildlife has important implications for conservation and management efforts. This is particularly the case for taxa that are susceptible to disease spillover events resulting in outbreaks and rapid population declines, such as carnivores. However, assessment of the spatial structure of pathogen exposure (pathogen spatial autocorrelation) is relatively rare for these kinds of taxa. Structure in pathogen exposure may reflect a number of important features, including host traits, pathogen traits, and detection methods utilized. The relatively wide‐ranging nature of many carnivores may lead to rapid pathogen spread and obfuscate any spatial autocorrelation being detectable, but this has not yet been explicitly evaluated. Here, we tested for evidence of spatial structuring of pathogen exposure and coexposures for puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus), both mobile and wide‐ranging felid species. The study included 440 puma and 639 bobcat from six study regions (one in Florida, two in Colorado, and three in California), as well as each animal's capture location and exposure status for up to eight pathogens. This allowed a thorough examination of spatial patterns of pathogen exposure across different pathogen transmission types, different habitats, and different host ecology. We tested for spatial autocorrelation for each pathogen in each host species at each site, as well as both host species combined. In addition, we tested for coexposure between all pathogens in the study, and for those pathogens that were correlated, we tested for spatial clusters of coexposure. We detected spatial autocorrelation in exposure status for approximately 2% and 10% of examined cases for puma and bobcats, respectively, and spatial clustering in approximately 17% of cases where pathogen coexposures were detected. These results suggest that wide‐ranging species, such as puma and bobcat, may rapidly disseminate pathogens across their populations, precluding substantive detection of autocorrelation in pathogen exposure by traditional serological and infection detection methods. Thus, targeted pathogen surveillance or control might focus on individual host characteristics, and advances in understanding pathogen spread in these secretive felids may necessitate examinations of spatial structure in both pathogen and host genetics.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1558carnivoreclustercoexposureLynx rufuspathogen exposurePuma concolor |
spellingShingle | Marie L. J. Gilbertson Scott Carver Sue VandeWoude Kevin R. Crooks Michael R. Lappin Meggan E. Craft Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus) Ecosphere carnivore cluster coexposure Lynx rufus pathogen exposure Puma concolor |
title | Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus) |
title_full | Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus) |
title_fullStr | Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus) |
title_full_unstemmed | Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus) |
title_short | Is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated? Patterns of pathogens in puma (Puma concolor) and bobcat (Lynx rufus) |
title_sort | is pathogen exposure spatially autocorrelated patterns of pathogens in puma puma concolor and bobcat lynx rufus |
topic | carnivore cluster coexposure Lynx rufus pathogen exposure Puma concolor |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marieljgilbertson ispathogenexposurespatiallyautocorrelatedpatternsofpathogensinpumapumaconcolorandbobcatlynxrufus AT scottcarver ispathogenexposurespatiallyautocorrelatedpatternsofpathogensinpumapumaconcolorandbobcatlynxrufus AT suevandewoude ispathogenexposurespatiallyautocorrelatedpatternsofpathogensinpumapumaconcolorandbobcatlynxrufus AT kevinrcrooks ispathogenexposurespatiallyautocorrelatedpatternsofpathogensinpumapumaconcolorandbobcatlynxrufus AT michaelrlappin ispathogenexposurespatiallyautocorrelatedpatternsofpathogensinpumapumaconcolorandbobcatlynxrufus AT megganecraft ispathogenexposurespatiallyautocorrelatedpatternsofpathogensinpumapumaconcolorandbobcatlynxrufus |