PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARA

Abstract This research aims to examine the effect of corporate governance on the corporate social disclosure in the South East Asia companies as well as to test the difference of the level of corporate social disclosure (CSD) between three countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thayland. Variables in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edy Supriyono, Djoko Suhardjanto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Islam Indonesia 2015-11-01
Series:Jurnal Siasat Bisnis
Online Access:https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/article/view/3649
_version_ 1826543998909546496
author Edy Supriyono
Djoko Suhardjanto
author_facet Edy Supriyono
Djoko Suhardjanto
author_sort Edy Supriyono
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This research aims to examine the effect of corporate governance on the corporate social disclosure in the South East Asia companies as well as to test the difference of the level of corporate social disclosure (CSD) between three countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thayland. Variables in the research are: the number of commissioners, board competence, the proportion of independent commissioners, audit committee size, the proportion of independent audit committees, and ownership of managerial. Global Reporting Initiative 2006 is used to measurement CSD. Sample in this study were drawn from the company's annual report on Indonesia Stock Exchange, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, and Thayland Stock Exchange in 2009. There are a significant predictors namely the competency of the board of director, numbers of audit committee and proportion independent audit committees on corporate social disclosure. The number of commissioners, the proportion of independent commissioners, and ownership of managerial are not as determinant significant that only firms size and industry type. There are different corporate social disclosure practice in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thayland. Level of disclosure in Indonesia over an average of 40,14%, 58,52% in Malaysia, and 54,12% in Thayland. This is caused by differences in corporate governance practices in those countries. Keywords: corporate social disclosure, corporate governance, comparative study. Abstraksi Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap pengungkapan sosial perusahaan pada perusahaan-perusahaan di Asia Tenggara serta untuk menguji perbedaan tingkat pengungkapan sosial perusahaan (CSD) antara tiga negara: Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Thailand. Variabel dalam penelitian ini adalah: jumlah komisaris, dewan kompetensi, proporsi komisaris independen, ukuran komite audit, proporsi komite audit independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial. Global Reporting Initiative 2006 digunakan untuk pengukuran CSD. Sampel dalam penelitian ini diambil dari laporan tahunan perusahaan di Bursa Efek Indonesia, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange dan Bursa Efek Thailand pada tahun 2009. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya prediktor yang signifikan yaitu kompetensi dewan direktur, jumlah komite audit dan proporsi komite audit independen terhadap pengungkapan sosial perusahaan. Jumlah komisaris, proporsi komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak sebagai penentu signifikan yang ukuran hanya perusahaan dan industri jenis. Ada perbedaan pengungkapan sosial perusahaan dalam praktik di Indonesia, Malaysia dan Thailand. Tingkat pengungkapan di Indonesia lebih dari rata-rata sebesar 40,14%; 58,52% di Malaysia dan 54,12% di Thailand. Hal ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan dalam praktik tata kelola perusahaan di negara-negara tersebut. Kata kunci: pengungkapan sosial perusahaan, tata kelola perusahaan, komparatif
first_indexed 2024-03-08T01:58:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9689b2dd6fa846a787565be99f73661c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0853-7666
2528-7001
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T04:54:59Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher Universitas Islam Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal Siasat Bisnis
spelling doaj.art-9689b2dd6fa846a787565be99f73661c2025-03-07T08:57:53ZengUniversitas Islam IndonesiaJurnal Siasat Bisnis0853-76662528-70012015-11-01172PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARAEdy Supriyono0Djoko Suhardjanto1STIE BANK BPD JATENGUniversitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Abstract This research aims to examine the effect of corporate governance on the corporate social disclosure in the South East Asia companies as well as to test the difference of the level of corporate social disclosure (CSD) between three countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thayland. Variables in the research are: the number of commissioners, board competence, the proportion of independent commissioners, audit committee size, the proportion of independent audit committees, and ownership of managerial. Global Reporting Initiative 2006 is used to measurement CSD. Sample in this study were drawn from the company's annual report on Indonesia Stock Exchange, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, and Thayland Stock Exchange in 2009. There are a significant predictors namely the competency of the board of director, numbers of audit committee and proportion independent audit committees on corporate social disclosure. The number of commissioners, the proportion of independent commissioners, and ownership of managerial are not as determinant significant that only firms size and industry type. There are different corporate social disclosure practice in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thayland. Level of disclosure in Indonesia over an average of 40,14%, 58,52% in Malaysia, and 54,12% in Thayland. This is caused by differences in corporate governance practices in those countries. Keywords: corporate social disclosure, corporate governance, comparative study. Abstraksi Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap pengungkapan sosial perusahaan pada perusahaan-perusahaan di Asia Tenggara serta untuk menguji perbedaan tingkat pengungkapan sosial perusahaan (CSD) antara tiga negara: Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Thailand. Variabel dalam penelitian ini adalah: jumlah komisaris, dewan kompetensi, proporsi komisaris independen, ukuran komite audit, proporsi komite audit independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial. Global Reporting Initiative 2006 digunakan untuk pengukuran CSD. Sampel dalam penelitian ini diambil dari laporan tahunan perusahaan di Bursa Efek Indonesia, Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange dan Bursa Efek Thailand pada tahun 2009. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya prediktor yang signifikan yaitu kompetensi dewan direktur, jumlah komite audit dan proporsi komite audit independen terhadap pengungkapan sosial perusahaan. Jumlah komisaris, proporsi komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak sebagai penentu signifikan yang ukuran hanya perusahaan dan industri jenis. Ada perbedaan pengungkapan sosial perusahaan dalam praktik di Indonesia, Malaysia dan Thailand. Tingkat pengungkapan di Indonesia lebih dari rata-rata sebesar 40,14%; 58,52% di Malaysia dan 54,12% di Thailand. Hal ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan dalam praktik tata kelola perusahaan di negara-negara tersebut. Kata kunci: pengungkapan sosial perusahaan, tata kelola perusahaan, komparatif https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/article/view/3649
spellingShingle Edy Supriyono
Djoko Suhardjanto
PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARA
Jurnal Siasat Bisnis
title PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARA
title_full PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARA
title_fullStr PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARA
title_full_unstemmed PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARA
title_short PRAKTIK PENGUNGKAPAN SOSIAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DI ASIA TENGGARA
title_sort praktik pengungkapan sosial studi komparatif di asia tenggara
url https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/article/view/3649
work_keys_str_mv AT edysupriyono praktikpengungkapansosialstudikomparatifdiasiatenggara
AT djokosuhardjanto praktikpengungkapansosialstudikomparatifdiasiatenggara