Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trial
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the severity of PEP using ProTaper Gold (PTG), ProTaper Next (PTN), and F-One rotary files in single-visit endodontic (SVE) treatment. Materials and Methods: In a randomized factorial clinical trial, 150 patients indicated for endodontic treatme...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Endodontology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2023;volume=35;issue=3;spage=217;epage=222;aulast=Patel |
| _version_ | 1797352174201602048 |
|---|---|
| author | Nishtha K Patel Kailas Attur Kamal P Bagda Krushnangi Yagnik Prerak Doshi Anjali Oak |
| author_facet | Nishtha K Patel Kailas Attur Kamal P Bagda Krushnangi Yagnik Prerak Doshi Anjali Oak |
| author_sort | Nishtha K Patel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the severity of PEP using ProTaper Gold (PTG), ProTaper Next (PTN), and F-One rotary files in single-visit endodontic (SVE) treatment.
Materials and Methods: In a randomized factorial clinical trial, 150 patients indicated for endodontic treatment in maxillary molars and mandibular molars were selected. They were separated into three groups: Group 1 (PTG), Group 2 (PTN), and Group 3 (F-One). SVE treatment was done under local anesthesia. The intensity of PEP was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after 24, 48, 72 h, and 1 week. Finally, the data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS software. VAS was analyzed using analysis of variance test with Scheffe's post hoc test.
Results: PEP was less in Group 3 (F-One) and Group 2 (PTN) as compared to Group 1 (PTG) at 24.48 h which is statistically significant (P < 0.05), whereas the difference between PTN and F-One was statistically insignificant.
Conclusion: All file systems showed PEP, but the intensity of pain was minimum in F-One single rotary file system followed by PTN and PTG Multi-file systems. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T13:12:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-96a183ad7f8646c591fb34e96e91d88c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-7212 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T13:12:28Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Endodontology |
| spelling | doaj.art-96a183ad7f8646c591fb34e96e91d88c2024-01-18T11:28:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEndodontology0970-72122023-01-0135321722210.4103/endo.endo_69_22Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trialNishtha K PatelKailas AtturKamal P BagdaKrushnangi YagnikPrerak DoshiAnjali OakAim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the severity of PEP using ProTaper Gold (PTG), ProTaper Next (PTN), and F-One rotary files in single-visit endodontic (SVE) treatment. Materials and Methods: In a randomized factorial clinical trial, 150 patients indicated for endodontic treatment in maxillary molars and mandibular molars were selected. They were separated into three groups: Group 1 (PTG), Group 2 (PTN), and Group 3 (F-One). SVE treatment was done under local anesthesia. The intensity of PEP was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after 24, 48, 72 h, and 1 week. Finally, the data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS software. VAS was analyzed using analysis of variance test with Scheffe's post hoc test. Results: PEP was less in Group 3 (F-One) and Group 2 (PTN) as compared to Group 1 (PTG) at 24.48 h which is statistically significant (P < 0.05), whereas the difference between PTN and F-One was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: All file systems showed PEP, but the intensity of pain was minimum in F-One single rotary file system followed by PTN and PTG Multi-file systems.http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2023;volume=35;issue=3;spage=217;epage=222;aulast=Patelf-onepostendodontic painprotaper goldprotaper nextsingle-visit endodontics |
| spellingShingle | Nishtha K Patel Kailas Attur Kamal P Bagda Krushnangi Yagnik Prerak Doshi Anjali Oak Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trial Endodontology f-one postendodontic pain protaper gold protaper next single-visit endodontics |
| title | Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trial |
| title_full | Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trial |
| title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trial |
| title_short | Comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics: A randomized clinical trial |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of postendodontic pain using multiple versus single rotary file systems in single visit endodontics a randomized clinical trial |
| topic | f-one postendodontic pain protaper gold protaper next single-visit endodontics |
| url | http://www.endodontologyonweb.org/article.asp?issn=0970-7212;year=2023;volume=35;issue=3;spage=217;epage=222;aulast=Patel |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nishthakpatel comparativeanalysisofpostendodonticpainusingmultipleversussinglerotaryfilesystemsinsinglevisitendodonticsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT kailasattur comparativeanalysisofpostendodonticpainusingmultipleversussinglerotaryfilesystemsinsinglevisitendodonticsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT kamalpbagda comparativeanalysisofpostendodonticpainusingmultipleversussinglerotaryfilesystemsinsinglevisitendodonticsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT krushnangiyagnik comparativeanalysisofpostendodonticpainusingmultipleversussinglerotaryfilesystemsinsinglevisitendodonticsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT prerakdoshi comparativeanalysisofpostendodonticpainusingmultipleversussinglerotaryfilesystemsinsinglevisitendodonticsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT anjalioak comparativeanalysisofpostendodonticpainusingmultipleversussinglerotaryfilesystemsinsinglevisitendodonticsarandomizedclinicaltrial |