The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Portugal

Introduction: The recently created Health Technology Assessment System (SiNATS) in Portugal will allow the reassessment of health technologies in a clinical practice context. This position paper intends to list and briefly describe the numerous challenges and limitations that may influence the prem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro Laires, Mónica Inês, Miguel Gouveia, Céu Mateus, Luis Silva Miguel, Carlos Gouveia Pinto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Formifarma, LDA. 2016-09-01
Series:Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/128
_version_ 1797733211580661760
author Pedro Laires
Mónica Inês
Miguel Gouveia
Céu Mateus
Luis Silva Miguel
Carlos Gouveia Pinto
author_facet Pedro Laires
Mónica Inês
Miguel Gouveia
Céu Mateus
Luis Silva Miguel
Carlos Gouveia Pinto
author_sort Pedro Laires
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The recently created Health Technology Assessment System (SiNATS) in Portugal will allow the reassessment of health technologies in a clinical practice context. This position paper intends to list and briefly describe the numerous challenges and limitations that may influence the premises and the outcomes of the health technology reassessments and therefore its own purpose. This paper reflects the position adopted by the ISPOR Portugal Regional Chapter (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research – ISPOR Portugal) regarding this subject. Methods: A group of members of ISPOR Portugal reviewed the literature available, namely documents of international workgroups that have previously focused on similar matters, and conducted a critical analysis on the challenges faced by health technologies reassessment within the national context. A final revision of the paper was requested to all members of the ISPOR Portugal Regional Chapter. Results: Several limitations that may potentially compromise the reassessment of health technologies have been identified and thoroughly described, namely those with regard to the intervention itself (i.e. the health technology), the study population, the selection of the comparator and the Health outcomes to consider in this type of analysis. The relevance of the information sources on which the investigation of comparative effectiveness may rely upon (at least to some extent) as well as the limitations and flaws inherent to it (i.e. bias and confounding factors) were also highlighted. Conclusions: A health technology reassessment system must be subject to an a priori analysis regarding its potentialities and limitations. In this paper these issues are addressed while taking SiNATS’s goals as reference points. Nevertheless, it is necessary to give continuity to this work, particularly through the creation of workgroups whose purpose is to study and analyze with greater detail the matters mentioned herein. Such work may, in fact, prove to be crucial for a successful implementation of a reassessment system that makes fair and efficient decisions on the funding of health technologies in Portugal.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:25:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-96a1fca091204e11b38028e82f1087df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1647-354X
2183-7341
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:25:43Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Formifarma, LDA.
record_format Article
series Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia
spelling doaj.art-96a1fca091204e11b38028e82f1087df2023-08-29T22:58:35ZengFormifarma, LDA.Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia1647-354X2183-73412016-09-018310.25756/rpf.v8i3.128The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in PortugalPedro LairesMónica InêsMiguel GouveiaCéu MateusLuis Silva MiguelCarlos Gouveia Pinto Introduction: The recently created Health Technology Assessment System (SiNATS) in Portugal will allow the reassessment of health technologies in a clinical practice context. This position paper intends to list and briefly describe the numerous challenges and limitations that may influence the premises and the outcomes of the health technology reassessments and therefore its own purpose. This paper reflects the position adopted by the ISPOR Portugal Regional Chapter (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research – ISPOR Portugal) regarding this subject. Methods: A group of members of ISPOR Portugal reviewed the literature available, namely documents of international workgroups that have previously focused on similar matters, and conducted a critical analysis on the challenges faced by health technologies reassessment within the national context. A final revision of the paper was requested to all members of the ISPOR Portugal Regional Chapter. Results: Several limitations that may potentially compromise the reassessment of health technologies have been identified and thoroughly described, namely those with regard to the intervention itself (i.e. the health technology), the study population, the selection of the comparator and the Health outcomes to consider in this type of analysis. The relevance of the information sources on which the investigation of comparative effectiveness may rely upon (at least to some extent) as well as the limitations and flaws inherent to it (i.e. bias and confounding factors) were also highlighted. Conclusions: A health technology reassessment system must be subject to an a priori analysis regarding its potentialities and limitations. In this paper these issues are addressed while taking SiNATS’s goals as reference points. Nevertheless, it is necessary to give continuity to this work, particularly through the creation of workgroups whose purpose is to study and analyze with greater detail the matters mentioned herein. Such work may, in fact, prove to be crucial for a successful implementation of a reassessment system that makes fair and efficient decisions on the funding of health technologies in Portugal. http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/128EconomicsPharmaceuticalHealth Care CostsNational Health ProgramsPortugalTechnology Assessment
spellingShingle Pedro Laires
Mónica Inês
Miguel Gouveia
Céu Mateus
Luis Silva Miguel
Carlos Gouveia Pinto
The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Portugal
Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia
Economics
Pharmaceutical
Health Care Costs
National Health Programs
Portugal
Technology Assessment
title The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Portugal
title_full The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Portugal
title_fullStr The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Portugal
title_short The Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Portugal
title_sort challenges of health technology assessment in portugal
topic Economics
Pharmaceutical
Health Care Costs
National Health Programs
Portugal
Technology Assessment
url http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/128
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrolaires thechallengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT monicaines thechallengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT miguelgouveia thechallengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT ceumateus thechallengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT luissilvamiguel thechallengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT carlosgouveiapinto thechallengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT pedrolaires challengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT monicaines challengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT miguelgouveia challengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT ceumateus challengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT luissilvamiguel challengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal
AT carlosgouveiapinto challengesofhealthtechnologyassessmentinportugal