Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy

The current study employed interrupted time series (ITS) models to analyze all available (published and unpublished) Abstract Semantic Associative Network Training (AbSANT) data. AbSANT is a semantically focused anomia treatment that targets not only concrete but abstract words, unique among existin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaleece W. Sandberg, Hannah Khorassani, Teresa Gray, Michael Walsh Dickey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2023.1017389/full
_version_ 1827874930946998272
author Chaleece W. Sandberg
Hannah Khorassani
Teresa Gray
Michael Walsh Dickey
Michael Walsh Dickey
author_facet Chaleece W. Sandberg
Hannah Khorassani
Teresa Gray
Michael Walsh Dickey
Michael Walsh Dickey
author_sort Chaleece W. Sandberg
collection DOAJ
description The current study employed interrupted time series (ITS) models to analyze all available (published and unpublished) Abstract Semantic Associative Network Training (AbSANT) data. AbSANT is a semantically focused anomia treatment that targets not only concrete but abstract words, unique among existing anomia treatments. However, evidence to date for the positive effects of AbSANT comes only from small-sample, single-subject design studies, limiting the strength of this evidence and the inferences that can be drawn from it. The statistical power and greater representativeness afforded by this larger aggregated sample enabled us to look for group-level efficacy evidence for AbSANT, examine specific questions about AbSANT's direct training and generalization effects, and identify potential predictors and mechanisms of AbSANT treatment response. We found that across 33 participants from four different data sources, AbSANT appears to be a robust word retrieval therapy protocol, with overall direct training and generalization effects that were more meaningful than exposure effects. Similar to previous smaller-sample study conclusions, we found that in this large sample, training abstract words results not only in larger direct training effects than training concrete words, but also larger generalization effects, suggesting that while AbSANT successfully improves both abstract and concrete word retrieval, it may be better suited for training abstract words. In general, direct training effects were more persistent after treatment ended than generalization effects and effects for concrete words were more persistent than for abstract words. Additionally, the effects of generalization appear to be distinct from the effects of simple exposure to words, and generalization effects are consistent with AbSANT's hypothesized mechanism of action: spreading activation from directly trained concepts to related concepts. Also consistent with this mechanism, we found that milder aphasia and both conceptual and lexical semantic processing ability predicted both direct training and generalization gains, and that executive function was predictive of generalization effects. These factors are thus important to consider when evaluating the appropriateness of AbSANT for individual clients.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:58:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-96a406a597c542ccac35611bd65338b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-6861
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:58:56Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
spelling doaj.art-96a406a597c542ccac35611bd65338b52023-08-07T18:25:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences2673-68612023-08-01410.3389/fresc.2023.10173891017389Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacyChaleece W. Sandberg0Hannah Khorassani1Teresa Gray2Michael Walsh Dickey3Michael Walsh Dickey4Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United StatesDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United StatesGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United StatesThe current study employed interrupted time series (ITS) models to analyze all available (published and unpublished) Abstract Semantic Associative Network Training (AbSANT) data. AbSANT is a semantically focused anomia treatment that targets not only concrete but abstract words, unique among existing anomia treatments. However, evidence to date for the positive effects of AbSANT comes only from small-sample, single-subject design studies, limiting the strength of this evidence and the inferences that can be drawn from it. The statistical power and greater representativeness afforded by this larger aggregated sample enabled us to look for group-level efficacy evidence for AbSANT, examine specific questions about AbSANT's direct training and generalization effects, and identify potential predictors and mechanisms of AbSANT treatment response. We found that across 33 participants from four different data sources, AbSANT appears to be a robust word retrieval therapy protocol, with overall direct training and generalization effects that were more meaningful than exposure effects. Similar to previous smaller-sample study conclusions, we found that in this large sample, training abstract words results not only in larger direct training effects than training concrete words, but also larger generalization effects, suggesting that while AbSANT successfully improves both abstract and concrete word retrieval, it may be better suited for training abstract words. In general, direct training effects were more persistent after treatment ended than generalization effects and effects for concrete words were more persistent than for abstract words. Additionally, the effects of generalization appear to be distinct from the effects of simple exposure to words, and generalization effects are consistent with AbSANT's hypothesized mechanism of action: spreading activation from directly trained concepts to related concepts. Also consistent with this mechanism, we found that milder aphasia and both conceptual and lexical semantic processing ability predicted both direct training and generalization gains, and that executive function was predictive of generalization effects. These factors are thus important to consider when evaluating the appropriateness of AbSANT for individual clients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2023.1017389/fullaphasiaanomia treatmentabstract conceptssemanticsmeta-analysis
spellingShingle Chaleece W. Sandberg
Hannah Khorassani
Teresa Gray
Michael Walsh Dickey
Michael Walsh Dickey
Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
aphasia
anomia treatment
abstract concepts
semantics
meta-analysis
title Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy
title_full Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy
title_fullStr Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy
title_short Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy
title_sort novel participant level meta analytic evidence for absant efficacy
topic aphasia
anomia treatment
abstract concepts
semantics
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2023.1017389/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chaleecewsandberg novelparticipantlevelmetaanalyticevidenceforabsantefficacy
AT hannahkhorassani novelparticipantlevelmetaanalyticevidenceforabsantefficacy
AT teresagray novelparticipantlevelmetaanalyticevidenceforabsantefficacy
AT michaelwalshdickey novelparticipantlevelmetaanalyticevidenceforabsantefficacy
AT michaelwalshdickey novelparticipantlevelmetaanalyticevidenceforabsantefficacy