Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employment

The article considers main approaches to the study of non-standard labor relations. Based on the conceptual model proposed by C. Rakowski, three approaches to the analysis of non-standard labor relations are presented: structuralist, neo-Marxist, and legalist. The author identifies methodological li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: R. I. Anisimov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2019-12-01
Series:RUDN journal of Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/21687/17181
_version_ 1817981051874574336
author R. I. Anisimov
author_facet R. I. Anisimov
author_sort R. I. Anisimov
collection DOAJ
description The article considers main approaches to the study of non-standard labor relations. Based on the conceptual model proposed by C. Rakowski, three approaches to the analysis of non-standard labor relations are presented: structuralist, neo-Marxist, and legalist. The author identifies methodological limitations and heuristic potential of these approaches, and using statistical and sociological data claims that non-standard labor relations are widespread in Russia (from 32 to 59 million people). The article presents different estimates of non-standard labor relations: some authors focus on their advantages, others - on disadvantages depending on the ideological positions and the object of analysis. The author insists on the methodological confusion in the study of non-standard labor relations in the legalist approach which combines informal economy with non-standard employment, making it difficult to consider beneficiaries and ‘victims’ of the emerging system. According to the studies, the benefits of non-standard labor relations are typical for entrepreneurs, while disadvantages - for employees. The author proposes to distinguish employees from non-standard labor relations and entrepreneurs in the informal economy, which allows to combine all concepts of non-standard labor relations and to identify winners and losers of such relations. The article also mentions reasons for the growth of non-standard labor relations: globalization, automatization of labor, changes of labor values, and social policy - under the evolution of capitalism as a historical system.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:00:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-96aa8a5f13ad4a59a87790071854cc71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-2272
2408-8897
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:00:57Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN journal of Sociology
spelling doaj.art-96aa8a5f13ad4a59a87790071854cc712022-12-22T02:25:51ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN journal of Sociology2313-22722408-88972019-12-0119354355210.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-3-543-55217852Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employmentR. I. Anisimov0Russian State University for HumanitiesThe article considers main approaches to the study of non-standard labor relations. Based on the conceptual model proposed by C. Rakowski, three approaches to the analysis of non-standard labor relations are presented: structuralist, neo-Marxist, and legalist. The author identifies methodological limitations and heuristic potential of these approaches, and using statistical and sociological data claims that non-standard labor relations are widespread in Russia (from 32 to 59 million people). The article presents different estimates of non-standard labor relations: some authors focus on their advantages, others - on disadvantages depending on the ideological positions and the object of analysis. The author insists on the methodological confusion in the study of non-standard labor relations in the legalist approach which combines informal economy with non-standard employment, making it difficult to consider beneficiaries and ‘victims’ of the emerging system. According to the studies, the benefits of non-standard labor relations are typical for entrepreneurs, while disadvantages - for employees. The author proposes to distinguish employees from non-standard labor relations and entrepreneurs in the informal economy, which allows to combine all concepts of non-standard labor relations and to identify winners and losers of such relations. The article also mentions reasons for the growth of non-standard labor relations: globalization, automatization of labor, changes of labor values, and social policy - under the evolution of capitalism as a historical system.http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/21687/17181non-standard labor relationsinformal economycapitalismentrepreneuremployeeprecariatglobalizationlabor valuesautomationsocial policy
spellingShingle R. I. Anisimov
Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employment
RUDN journal of Sociology
non-standard labor relations
informal economy
capitalism
entrepreneur
employee
precariat
globalization
labor values
automation
social policy
title Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employment
title_full Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employment
title_fullStr Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employment
title_full_unstemmed Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employment
title_short Non-standard work: Who wins? Theoretical-methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non-standard employment
title_sort non standard work who wins theoretical methodological analysis of the approaches to the study of non standard employment
topic non-standard labor relations
informal economy
capitalism
entrepreneur
employee
precariat
globalization
labor values
automation
social policy
url http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/21687/17181
work_keys_str_mv AT rianisimov nonstandardworkwhowinstheoreticalmethodologicalanalysisoftheapproachestothestudyofnonstandardemployment