The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Abstract Objective To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingwen Su, Shuang Li, Qiyu Sui, Gongchao Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8
_version_ 1811258003329908736
author Jingwen Su
Shuang Li
Qiyu Sui
Gongchao Wang
author_facet Jingwen Su
Shuang Li
Qiyu Sui
Gongchao Wang
author_sort Jingwen Su
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, CBM, and Wanfang Data from inception to March 18, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3. Results This analysis included eight studies, enrolling 264 patients who underwent MIE and 257 patients who underwent OE. The meta-analysis results showed that the MIE group had a higher outcome regarding the percent predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) 1 month after surgery than the OE group. In addition, those who underwent MIE had lower ΔVC%, ΔFVC, and ΔFEV1 between pre-operation and 1 month after surgery than those who underwent OE. There is no statistical difference between the two groups in ΔMVV. Conclusion Compared with OE, MIE has a more protective effect on postoperative pulmonary function. However, due to the small number of included literature and all cohort studies, this finding needs to be validated with larger samples and higher quality RCT studies.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:06:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-96b8b061d64d45b8a6a32df01ef3fedb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:06:26Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-96b8b061d64d45b8a6a32df01ef3fedb2022-12-22T03:21:58ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902022-06-0117111010.1186/s13019-022-01824-8The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysisJingwen Su0Shuang Li1Qiyu Sui2Gongchao Wang3School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversitySchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversitySchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversitySchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversityAbstract Objective To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, CBM, and Wanfang Data from inception to March 18, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3. Results This analysis included eight studies, enrolling 264 patients who underwent MIE and 257 patients who underwent OE. The meta-analysis results showed that the MIE group had a higher outcome regarding the percent predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) 1 month after surgery than the OE group. In addition, those who underwent MIE had lower ΔVC%, ΔFVC, and ΔFEV1 between pre-operation and 1 month after surgery than those who underwent OE. There is no statistical difference between the two groups in ΔMVV. Conclusion Compared with OE, MIE has a more protective effect on postoperative pulmonary function. However, due to the small number of included literature and all cohort studies, this finding needs to be validated with larger samples and higher quality RCT studies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8Esophageal cancerMinimally invasive esophagectomyOpen esophagectomyPulmonary functionMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Jingwen Su
Shuang Li
Qiyu Sui
Gongchao Wang
The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Esophageal cancer
Minimally invasive esophagectomy
Open esophagectomy
Pulmonary function
Meta-analysis
title The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
title_full The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
title_short The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
title_sort influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients a meta analysis
topic Esophageal cancer
Minimally invasive esophagectomy
Open esophagectomy
Pulmonary function
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jingwensu theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT shuangli theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT qiyusui theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT gongchaowang theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT jingwensu influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT shuangli influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT qiyusui influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT gongchaowang influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis