The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis
Abstract Objective To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patient...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8 |
_version_ | 1811258003329908736 |
---|---|
author | Jingwen Su Shuang Li Qiyu Sui Gongchao Wang |
author_facet | Jingwen Su Shuang Li Qiyu Sui Gongchao Wang |
author_sort | Jingwen Su |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, CBM, and Wanfang Data from inception to March 18, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3. Results This analysis included eight studies, enrolling 264 patients who underwent MIE and 257 patients who underwent OE. The meta-analysis results showed that the MIE group had a higher outcome regarding the percent predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) 1 month after surgery than the OE group. In addition, those who underwent MIE had lower ΔVC%, ΔFVC, and ΔFEV1 between pre-operation and 1 month after surgery than those who underwent OE. There is no statistical difference between the two groups in ΔMVV. Conclusion Compared with OE, MIE has a more protective effect on postoperative pulmonary function. However, due to the small number of included literature and all cohort studies, this finding needs to be validated with larger samples and higher quality RCT studies. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:06:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-96b8b061d64d45b8a6a32df01ef3fedb |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1749-8090 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:06:26Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery |
spelling | doaj.art-96b8b061d64d45b8a6a32df01ef3fedb2022-12-22T03:21:58ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902022-06-0117111010.1186/s13019-022-01824-8The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysisJingwen Su0Shuang Li1Qiyu Sui2Gongchao Wang3School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversitySchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversitySchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversitySchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong UniversityAbstract Objective To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, CBM, and Wanfang Data from inception to March 18, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3. Results This analysis included eight studies, enrolling 264 patients who underwent MIE and 257 patients who underwent OE. The meta-analysis results showed that the MIE group had a higher outcome regarding the percent predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) 1 month after surgery than the OE group. In addition, those who underwent MIE had lower ΔVC%, ΔFVC, and ΔFEV1 between pre-operation and 1 month after surgery than those who underwent OE. There is no statistical difference between the two groups in ΔMVV. Conclusion Compared with OE, MIE has a more protective effect on postoperative pulmonary function. However, due to the small number of included literature and all cohort studies, this finding needs to be validated with larger samples and higher quality RCT studies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8Esophageal cancerMinimally invasive esophagectomyOpen esophagectomyPulmonary functionMeta-analysis |
spellingShingle | Jingwen Su Shuang Li Qiyu Sui Gongchao Wang The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Esophageal cancer Minimally invasive esophagectomy Open esophagectomy Pulmonary function Meta-analysis |
title | The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_full | The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_short | The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients a meta analysis |
topic | Esophageal cancer Minimally invasive esophagectomy Open esophagectomy Pulmonary function Meta-analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingwensu theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis AT shuangli theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis AT qiyusui theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis AT gongchaowang theinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis AT jingwensu influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis AT shuangli influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis AT qiyusui influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis AT gongchaowang influenceofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyonpostoperativepulmonaryfunctioninesophagealcancerpatientsametaanalysis |