Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement

Objective: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments of nickel chrome (NiCr) with the type of metal primer monomers on the conventional tensile bond strength (CTBS) of resin cement. Methods: Forty disks of NiCr alloy were prepared for CTBS test and grouped as follows: group (1) no surfa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raghad S. Jamel, Màan M. Nayif, Mohammed A. Abdulla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-07-01
Series:Saudi Dental Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218306485
_version_ 1811259226540998656
author Raghad S. Jamel
Màan M. Nayif
Mohammed A. Abdulla
author_facet Raghad S. Jamel
Màan M. Nayif
Mohammed A. Abdulla
author_sort Raghad S. Jamel
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments of nickel chrome (NiCr) with the type of metal primer monomers on the conventional tensile bond strength (CTBS) of resin cement. Methods: Forty disks of NiCr alloy were prepared for CTBS test and grouped as follows: group (1) no surface treatment (control group), group (2) oxide layer only, group (3) air abrasion, and group (4) air abrasion with an oxide layer. Each main group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 5) depending upon the type of metal primer used for metal treatment. All specimens were bonded with resin cements. The CTBS was tested using a tensile testing machine. The data were statistically analyzed with One-way ANOVA, Two-way ANOVA, and T-test at 0.05 level of significance. Results: Significant differences in the mean value of the CTBS between different surface treatments (P ≤ 0.05) were observed. Tukey's test showed that air abrasion surface treatment had the highest mean value followed by the air abrasion with an oxide layer and oxide layer only. The control group showed the lowest value of significant difference compared to all treated groups (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: CTBS of self-adhesive resin cement to NiCr is dependent on surface treatment. Two types of the metal primer of different monomer contents 10-methacryloyloxydecyldihydrogenphosphate (MDP) or Thiophosphoricmethacrylate (MEPS) show similar behavior on the tensile bond strength. Keywords: Metal primer, Nickel chrome, Resin cement
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:27:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-96cd9bc1586d40feb11ebe26ce4e2434
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1013-9052
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:27:23Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Saudi Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-96cd9bc1586d40feb11ebe26ce4e24342022-12-22T03:21:12ZengElsevierSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522019-07-01313343349Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cementRaghad S. Jamel0Màan M. Nayif1Mohammed A. Abdulla2Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, IraqDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, IraqDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq; Corresponding author.Objective: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments of nickel chrome (NiCr) with the type of metal primer monomers on the conventional tensile bond strength (CTBS) of resin cement. Methods: Forty disks of NiCr alloy were prepared for CTBS test and grouped as follows: group (1) no surface treatment (control group), group (2) oxide layer only, group (3) air abrasion, and group (4) air abrasion with an oxide layer. Each main group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 5) depending upon the type of metal primer used for metal treatment. All specimens were bonded with resin cements. The CTBS was tested using a tensile testing machine. The data were statistically analyzed with One-way ANOVA, Two-way ANOVA, and T-test at 0.05 level of significance. Results: Significant differences in the mean value of the CTBS between different surface treatments (P ≤ 0.05) were observed. Tukey's test showed that air abrasion surface treatment had the highest mean value followed by the air abrasion with an oxide layer and oxide layer only. The control group showed the lowest value of significant difference compared to all treated groups (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: CTBS of self-adhesive resin cement to NiCr is dependent on surface treatment. Two types of the metal primer of different monomer contents 10-methacryloyloxydecyldihydrogenphosphate (MDP) or Thiophosphoricmethacrylate (MEPS) show similar behavior on the tensile bond strength. Keywords: Metal primer, Nickel chrome, Resin cementhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218306485
spellingShingle Raghad S. Jamel
Màan M. Nayif
Mohammed A. Abdulla
Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement
Saudi Dental Journal
title Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement
title_full Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement
title_fullStr Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement
title_short Influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement
title_sort influence of different surface treatments of nickel chrome metal alloy and types of metal primer monomers on the tensile bond strength of a resin cement
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218306485
work_keys_str_mv AT raghadsjamel influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofnickelchromemetalalloyandtypesofmetalprimermonomersonthetensilebondstrengthofaresincement
AT maanmnayif influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofnickelchromemetalalloyandtypesofmetalprimermonomersonthetensilebondstrengthofaresincement
AT mohammedaabdulla influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsofnickelchromemetalalloyandtypesofmetalprimermonomersonthetensilebondstrengthofaresincement