Strategic Reduction of Package Time in Head and Neck Cancer

Purpose: Total package time, or the time from diagnosis to completion of definitive treatment, has been associated with outcomes for a variety of tumor sites, but especially to head and neck (HN) cancer. Patients with HN cancer often undergo a complex diagnosis and treatment process involving multip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William N. Duggar, PhD, Lacey Weatherall, BS, Mary R. Nittala, DrPH, Toms V. Thomas, MD, Eswar K. Mundra, MD, Jeremy Otts, MS, William C. Woods, CNP, Claus Yang, PhD, Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109422002238
Description
Summary:Purpose: Total package time, or the time from diagnosis to completion of definitive treatment, has been associated with outcomes for a variety of tumor sites, but especially to head and neck (HN) cancer. Patients with HN cancer often undergo a complex diagnosis and treatment process involving multiple disciplines both within and outside of oncology. This complexity can lead to longer package times, and each involved discipline has the responsibility to maintain an efficient and effective process. Strategic intervention to improve package time must involve not only new technology or tools, but also “soft” components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership. This combination is necessary to truly optimize radiation therapy for HN cancer, leading to shorter total package times for these patients. Methods and Materials: Two interventions were strategically executed to improve radiation therapy workflow: upgrade of the treatment planning system and implementation of an automated patient management and accountability system. The radiation therapy–related timelines of 112 patients with HN cancer treated over 2 years were reviewed, and the average time differences were compared between the patient populations before and after the strategic interventions. Results: Purely upgrading the treatment planning system did not show significant improvements, but when combined with the patient management system, significant improvement in radiation-related package time can be noted for every time point. The overall reduction of radiation-related package time was statistically significant at 22.85 days (P = .002). Conclusions: On face value, the patient management system could be credited as responsible for the improvement, but on qualitative analysis, it is noted that the new system is only a tool that can be ignored or underused. Owing to the addition of important “soft” components such as accountability, motivation, and leadership, the patient management system was optimized and implemented in such a manner as to have the desired effect.
ISSN:2452-1094