Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging
PURPOSEApart from a few case reports, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement in osteochondromatosis has not been studied. We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such involvement using cross-sectional imaging.METHODSIn this retrospective study, three observers (one junior radiologist...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Publishing House
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/sacroiliac-joint-involvement-in-osteochondromatosi/57237
|
_version_ | 1797691438779072512 |
---|---|
author | Sevtap Arslan Adalet Elçin Yıldız Fatma Bilge Ergen Üstün Aydıngöz |
author_facet | Sevtap Arslan Adalet Elçin Yıldız Fatma Bilge Ergen Üstün Aydıngöz |
author_sort | Sevtap Arslan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | PURPOSEApart from a few case reports, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement in osteochondromatosis has not been studied. We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such involvement using cross-sectional imaging.METHODSIn this retrospective study, three observers (one junior radiologist and two musculoskeletal radiologists) independently reviewed computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients in our database who had osteochondromatosis (≥2 osteochondromas across the skeleton) for SIJ involvement. The final decision was reached by the consensus of the two musculoskeletal radiologists in a later joint session.RESULTSOf the 36 patients with osteochondromatosis in our database, 22 (61%) had cross-sectional imaging covering SIJs (14 females, 8 males; age range 7–66 years; mean age 23 years; 13 MRI, 9 CT). Of these, 16 (73%) had intra-articular osteochondromas. For identifying SIJ osteochondromas on cross-sectional imaging, interobserver agreement was substantial [κ = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34, 1.00] between the musculoskeletal radiologists and moderate (κ = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.94) between the junior radiologist and the final consensus decision of the two musculoskeletal radiologists. In the cohort with cross-sectional imaging, the anatomical variations of the accessory SIJ (n = 6, 27%) and iliosacral complex (n = 2, 9%) were identified in six different patients with (n = 2) and without (n = 4) sacroiliac osteochondromas.CONCLUSIONCross-sectional imaging shows frequent (73%) SIJ involvement in osteochondromatosis, which, although a rare disorder, nevertheless needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of such SIJ anatomical variants as the accessory SIJ and iliosacral complex. Differentiating these variants from osteochondromas is challenging in patients with osteochondromatosis. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:13:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-96eb9822c9494e2cae0e203ef3c7d283 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1305-3825 1305-3612 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T02:13:18Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing House |
record_format | Article |
series | Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology |
spelling | doaj.art-96eb9822c9494e2cae0e203ef3c7d2832023-09-06T11:54:11ZengGalenos Publishing HouseDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology1305-38251305-36122023-03-0129239039510.5152/dir.2022.21101813049054Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imagingSevtap Arslan0Adalet Elçin Yıldız1Fatma Bilge Ergen2Üstün Aydıngöz3 Clinic of Radiology, Afyonkarahisar Suhut State Hospital, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey PURPOSEApart from a few case reports, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement in osteochondromatosis has not been studied. We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of such involvement using cross-sectional imaging.METHODSIn this retrospective study, three observers (one junior radiologist and two musculoskeletal radiologists) independently reviewed computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients in our database who had osteochondromatosis (≥2 osteochondromas across the skeleton) for SIJ involvement. The final decision was reached by the consensus of the two musculoskeletal radiologists in a later joint session.RESULTSOf the 36 patients with osteochondromatosis in our database, 22 (61%) had cross-sectional imaging covering SIJs (14 females, 8 males; age range 7–66 years; mean age 23 years; 13 MRI, 9 CT). Of these, 16 (73%) had intra-articular osteochondromas. For identifying SIJ osteochondromas on cross-sectional imaging, interobserver agreement was substantial [κ = 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34, 1.00] between the musculoskeletal radiologists and moderate (κ = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.94) between the junior radiologist and the final consensus decision of the two musculoskeletal radiologists. In the cohort with cross-sectional imaging, the anatomical variations of the accessory SIJ (n = 6, 27%) and iliosacral complex (n = 2, 9%) were identified in six different patients with (n = 2) and without (n = 4) sacroiliac osteochondromas.CONCLUSIONCross-sectional imaging shows frequent (73%) SIJ involvement in osteochondromatosis, which, although a rare disorder, nevertheless needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of such SIJ anatomical variants as the accessory SIJ and iliosacral complex. Differentiating these variants from osteochondromas is challenging in patients with osteochondromatosis. http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/sacroiliac-joint-involvement-in-osteochondromatosi/57237 computed tomographymagnetic resonance imagingosteochondromaosteochondromatosissacroiliac joint |
spellingShingle | Sevtap Arslan Adalet Elçin Yıldız Fatma Bilge Ergen Üstün Aydıngöz Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging osteochondroma osteochondromatosis sacroiliac joint |
title | Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging |
title_full | Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging |
title_fullStr | Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging |
title_short | Sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis: identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross-sectional imaging |
title_sort | sacroiliac joint involvement in osteochondromatosis identifying its prevalence and characteristics from cross sectional imaging |
topic | computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging osteochondroma osteochondromatosis sacroiliac joint |
url |
http://www.dirjournal.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/sacroiliac-joint-involvement-in-osteochondromatosi/57237
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT sevtaparslan sacroiliacjointinvolvementinosteochondromatosisidentifyingitsprevalenceandcharacteristicsfromcrosssectionalimaging AT adaletelcinyıldız sacroiliacjointinvolvementinosteochondromatosisidentifyingitsprevalenceandcharacteristicsfromcrosssectionalimaging AT fatmabilgeergen sacroiliacjointinvolvementinosteochondromatosisidentifyingitsprevalenceandcharacteristicsfromcrosssectionalimaging AT ustunaydıngoz sacroiliacjointinvolvementinosteochondromatosisidentifyingitsprevalenceandcharacteristicsfromcrosssectionalimaging |