Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers

<p class="Judul"><strong>Introduction to The Problem:</strong> Life is the greatest gift human beings receive. Man can achieve any task with life, and without it, man can do nothing. Thus, attempts by the State to punish human beings with the death penalty for wrongdoing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muchammad Ichsan
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan 2020-02-01
Series:Jurnal Hukum Novelty
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/15291
_version_ 1811337471457230848
author Muchammad Ichsan
author_facet Muchammad Ichsan
author_sort Muchammad Ichsan
collection DOAJ
description <p class="Judul"><strong>Introduction to The Problem:</strong> Life is the greatest gift human beings receive. Man can achieve any task with life, and without it, man can do nothing. Thus, attempts by the State to punish human beings with the death penalty for wrongdoing are reaping the pros and cons. It is clear the stance of Western human rights activists opposed to the death penalty. What is interesting is that, although Islamic law supports it, many educated Muslims have objected to the death penalty.</p><p class="Judul"><strong>Purpose/Objective Study:</strong> The purpose of this research is to analyze and respond to the arguments used by Indonesian Muslim human rights activists, especially those integrated into human rights organizations, which are anti-death penalty. It is hoped that these reviews and responses will contain more definite opinions that can provide enlightenment for all.</p><p class="Judul"><strong>Design/Methodology/Approach:</strong> This research used a descriptive, analytical approach. Therefore, it employed secondary data and normative methods combined to case and statute approach in studying, analyzing, and responding to the arguments of anti-death penalty human rights activists among Indonesian Muslims. Their cases are to be brought forward, investigated, and then returned one by one.</p><p><strong>Findings:</strong> The research found that the human rights ideology propagated by western human rights activists is influencing Indonesian Muslim activists. They have the same point that the death penalty degrades humanity and violates human rights. In the meantime, Islamic law defends the death penalty for providing justice to the victims and the wider community, and for preserving life.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:55:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-96fb4e8a1ab64fc5a3662222f378bcc8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1412-6834
2550-0090
language Indonesian
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:55:18Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
record_format Article
series Jurnal Hukum Novelty
spelling doaj.art-96fb4e8a1ab64fc5a3662222f378bcc82022-12-22T02:36:32ZindUniversitas Ahmad DahlanJurnal Hukum Novelty1412-68342550-00902020-02-01111143010.26555/novelty.v11i1.a152916913Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim OpposersMuchammad Ichsan0Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta<p class="Judul"><strong>Introduction to The Problem:</strong> Life is the greatest gift human beings receive. Man can achieve any task with life, and without it, man can do nothing. Thus, attempts by the State to punish human beings with the death penalty for wrongdoing are reaping the pros and cons. It is clear the stance of Western human rights activists opposed to the death penalty. What is interesting is that, although Islamic law supports it, many educated Muslims have objected to the death penalty.</p><p class="Judul"><strong>Purpose/Objective Study:</strong> The purpose of this research is to analyze and respond to the arguments used by Indonesian Muslim human rights activists, especially those integrated into human rights organizations, which are anti-death penalty. It is hoped that these reviews and responses will contain more definite opinions that can provide enlightenment for all.</p><p class="Judul"><strong>Design/Methodology/Approach:</strong> This research used a descriptive, analytical approach. Therefore, it employed secondary data and normative methods combined to case and statute approach in studying, analyzing, and responding to the arguments of anti-death penalty human rights activists among Indonesian Muslims. Their cases are to be brought forward, investigated, and then returned one by one.</p><p><strong>Findings:</strong> The research found that the human rights ideology propagated by western human rights activists is influencing Indonesian Muslim activists. They have the same point that the death penalty degrades humanity and violates human rights. In the meantime, Islamic law defends the death penalty for providing justice to the victims and the wider community, and for preserving life.</p>http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/15291death penaltyhuman rightsislamic lawright to life
spellingShingle Muchammad Ichsan
Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers
Jurnal Hukum Novelty
death penalty
human rights
islamic law
right to life
title Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers
title_full Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers
title_fullStr Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers
title_full_unstemmed Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers
title_short Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers
title_sort death penalty a response to arguments by indonesian muslim opposers
topic death penalty
human rights
islamic law
right to life
url http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/15291
work_keys_str_mv AT muchammadichsan deathpenaltyaresponsetoargumentsbyindonesianmuslimopposers