Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Approximately 25% of so-called high utilizers of medical care are estimated to suffer from depression. A large proportion of these individuals remain undiagnosed and untreated. This study aims to examine the effects of a systematic s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2012-09-01
|
| Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/298 |
| _version_ | 1818833716746649600 |
|---|---|
| author | Berghöfer Anne Hartwich Astrid Bauer Michael Unützer Jürgen Willich Stefan N Pfennig Andrea |
| author_facet | Berghöfer Anne Hartwich Astrid Bauer Michael Unützer Jürgen Willich Stefan N Pfennig Andrea |
| author_sort | Berghöfer Anne |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Approximately 25% of so-called high utilizers of medical care are estimated to suffer from depression. A large proportion of these individuals remain undiagnosed and untreated. This study aims to examine the effects of a systematic screening and collaborative treatment program on depression severity in small primary care practices of the German outpatient health care system.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>High utilizers of primary care who screened positive for depressive symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Health Questionnaire (B-PHQ) were further diagnosed using the DIA-X, a standardized diagnostic interview, performed by trained and supervised interviewers. Patients with major depression were randomized (cluster randomization by practice) to (a) a six-month treatment program of pharmacotherapy, standardized patient and provider education, and physician and patient counseling or (b) six months of usual medical care. All subjects were followed for a 12-month observation period using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAMD-17) rated by the treating physicians and the B-PHQ-9 rated by the patients.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 63 high utilizer patients were included in the trial (17 male, 46 female), 19 randomized to intervention, 44 to usual care. The mean age was 49.7 (SD 13.8). Most patients had one or more somatic co-morbidities. There was no significant difference in response (defined as a decrease in the HAMD-17 sum score of at least 50%) after six months of treatment (50% vs. 42%, p = 0.961, all analyses adjusted for age) and after 12 months of treatment (83% vs. 54%, p = 0.282) between groups. Using patient self-rating assessments with the B-PHQ-9 questionnaire the intervention was superior to treatment as usual at six months (83% vs. 16%, p = 0.000).</p> <p>There was no significant difference in HAMD-17 depression severity at six months between the groups (10.5 (SD 7.6) vs. 12.3 (SD 7.8), p = 0.718), but a trend at 12 months (4.7 (SD 8.0) vs. 11.2 (SD 7.4), p = 0.083). Again, using B-PHQ-9 sum scores depression severity was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the treatment as usual group after six months (6.4 (SD 5.2) vs. 11.5 (SD 5.8), p = 0.020), but not at 12 months (7.9 (SD 8.7) vs. 9.0 (SD 5.2), p = 0.858).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A systematic collaborating treatment program for depression in high utilizers in primary care showed superiority to treatment as usual only in terms of patients´ self-assessment but not according to physicians´ assessment. The advance of the intervention group at 6 months was lost after 12 months of follow-up. Overall, positive results from similar trials in the US health care systems could not be confirmed in a German primary care setting.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T02:23:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9709fd50857f44488ff1fc88a5dbca6e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6963 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T02:23:21Z |
| publishDate | 2012-09-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Health Services Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-9709fd50857f44488ff1fc88a5dbca6e2022-12-21T20:40:05ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632012-09-0112129810.1186/1472-6963-12-298Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trialBerghöfer AnneHartwich AstridBauer MichaelUnützer JürgenWillich Stefan NPfennig Andrea<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Approximately 25% of so-called high utilizers of medical care are estimated to suffer from depression. A large proportion of these individuals remain undiagnosed and untreated. This study aims to examine the effects of a systematic screening and collaborative treatment program on depression severity in small primary care practices of the German outpatient health care system.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>High utilizers of primary care who screened positive for depressive symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Health Questionnaire (B-PHQ) were further diagnosed using the DIA-X, a standardized diagnostic interview, performed by trained and supervised interviewers. Patients with major depression were randomized (cluster randomization by practice) to (a) a six-month treatment program of pharmacotherapy, standardized patient and provider education, and physician and patient counseling or (b) six months of usual medical care. All subjects were followed for a 12-month observation period using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAMD-17) rated by the treating physicians and the B-PHQ-9 rated by the patients.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 63 high utilizer patients were included in the trial (17 male, 46 female), 19 randomized to intervention, 44 to usual care. The mean age was 49.7 (SD 13.8). Most patients had one or more somatic co-morbidities. There was no significant difference in response (defined as a decrease in the HAMD-17 sum score of at least 50%) after six months of treatment (50% vs. 42%, p = 0.961, all analyses adjusted for age) and after 12 months of treatment (83% vs. 54%, p = 0.282) between groups. Using patient self-rating assessments with the B-PHQ-9 questionnaire the intervention was superior to treatment as usual at six months (83% vs. 16%, p = 0.000).</p> <p>There was no significant difference in HAMD-17 depression severity at six months between the groups (10.5 (SD 7.6) vs. 12.3 (SD 7.8), p = 0.718), but a trend at 12 months (4.7 (SD 8.0) vs. 11.2 (SD 7.4), p = 0.083). Again, using B-PHQ-9 sum scores depression severity was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the treatment as usual group after six months (6.4 (SD 5.2) vs. 11.5 (SD 5.8), p = 0.020), but not at 12 months (7.9 (SD 8.7) vs. 9.0 (SD 5.2), p = 0.858).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A systematic collaborating treatment program for depression in high utilizers in primary care showed superiority to treatment as usual only in terms of patients´ self-assessment but not according to physicians´ assessment. The advance of the intervention group at 6 months was lost after 12 months of follow-up. Overall, positive results from similar trials in the US health care systems could not be confirmed in a German primary care setting.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/298 |
| spellingShingle | Berghöfer Anne Hartwich Astrid Bauer Michael Unützer Jürgen Willich Stefan N Pfennig Andrea Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial BMC Health Services Research |
| title | Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial |
| title_full | Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial |
| title_fullStr | Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial |
| title_short | Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial |
| title_sort | efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care a randomized trial |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/298 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT berghoferanne efficacyofasystematicdepressionmanagementprograminhighutilizersofprimarycarearandomizedtrial AT hartwichastrid efficacyofasystematicdepressionmanagementprograminhighutilizersofprimarycarearandomizedtrial AT bauermichael efficacyofasystematicdepressionmanagementprograminhighutilizersofprimarycarearandomizedtrial AT unutzerjurgen efficacyofasystematicdepressionmanagementprograminhighutilizersofprimarycarearandomizedtrial AT willichstefann efficacyofasystematicdepressionmanagementprograminhighutilizersofprimarycarearandomizedtrial AT pfennigandrea efficacyofasystematicdepressionmanagementprograminhighutilizersofprimarycarearandomizedtrial |