The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma Reduction

Background:. Malar/zygoma reduction is an effective procedure to change a broader, flatter facial appearance to an oval facial shape. Of the intraoral and coronal approaches, the intraoral is the more commonly used technique than the coronal, due to the perception that complications with the coronal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae-Yoon Seol, MD, PhD, Kenneth K. Kim, MD, FACS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-10-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005304
_version_ 1797646868976500736
author Jae-Yoon Seol, MD, PhD
Kenneth K. Kim, MD, FACS
author_facet Jae-Yoon Seol, MD, PhD
Kenneth K. Kim, MD, FACS
author_sort Jae-Yoon Seol, MD, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Malar/zygoma reduction is an effective procedure to change a broader, flatter facial appearance to an oval facial shape. Of the intraoral and coronal approaches, the intraoral is the more commonly used technique than the coronal, due to the perception that complications with the coronal approach are significant, and intraoral results are satisfactory. We compared the postoperative effects of both approaches. Methods:. From 1994 to 1999, we included the 150 intraoral cases that were followed up for 3 years postoperatively. From 2000 to 2018, we changed our technique to the coronal approach and included the 575 cases that were followed up for 3 years postoperatively. We compared the results of our prior intraoral approach with the more recent coronal approach. Results:. All cases of the intraoral approach resulted in smaller-sized faces horizontally; however, 90 patients (60%) still had resulting flat-shaped faces due to acute angle formation in the resultant zygoma. There were 141 cases (94%) of partial malunion and 138 cases (92%) of midface ptosis. Among the 575 coronal approaches, 518 cases (90%) resulted in an oval facial shape without acute angled zygoma. There were 161 cases (28%) of visible incision scars, 466 cases (81%) of temporary alopecia, 12 cases (2%) of hematoma, and 29 cases (5%) of temporary frontal facial nerve injury. Conclusions:. The intraoral approach led to flat and acute zygomas. The majority of patients experienced midface soft tissue ptosis. In contrast, the coronal approach led to an oval facial shape. The most notable complications of the coronal approach were visible scars and temporary alopecia.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:08:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9711b7e363aa4322a8ee1d2c8cc8e30f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-7574
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:08:00Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj.art-9711b7e363aa4322a8ee1d2c8cc8e30f2023-10-30T03:42:32ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742023-10-011110e530410.1097/GOX.0000000000005304202310000-00052The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma ReductionJae-Yoon Seol, MD, PhD0Kenneth K. Kim, MD, FACS1From * Seoljaeyoon Plastic Surgery, Seoul, South Korea† Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.Background:. Malar/zygoma reduction is an effective procedure to change a broader, flatter facial appearance to an oval facial shape. Of the intraoral and coronal approaches, the intraoral is the more commonly used technique than the coronal, due to the perception that complications with the coronal approach are significant, and intraoral results are satisfactory. We compared the postoperative effects of both approaches. Methods:. From 1994 to 1999, we included the 150 intraoral cases that were followed up for 3 years postoperatively. From 2000 to 2018, we changed our technique to the coronal approach and included the 575 cases that were followed up for 3 years postoperatively. We compared the results of our prior intraoral approach with the more recent coronal approach. Results:. All cases of the intraoral approach resulted in smaller-sized faces horizontally; however, 90 patients (60%) still had resulting flat-shaped faces due to acute angle formation in the resultant zygoma. There were 141 cases (94%) of partial malunion and 138 cases (92%) of midface ptosis. Among the 575 coronal approaches, 518 cases (90%) resulted in an oval facial shape without acute angled zygoma. There were 161 cases (28%) of visible incision scars, 466 cases (81%) of temporary alopecia, 12 cases (2%) of hematoma, and 29 cases (5%) of temporary frontal facial nerve injury. Conclusions:. The intraoral approach led to flat and acute zygomas. The majority of patients experienced midface soft tissue ptosis. In contrast, the coronal approach led to an oval facial shape. The most notable complications of the coronal approach were visible scars and temporary alopecia.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005304
spellingShingle Jae-Yoon Seol, MD, PhD
Kenneth K. Kim, MD, FACS
The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma Reduction
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma Reduction
title_full The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma Reduction
title_fullStr The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma Reduction
title_full_unstemmed The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma Reduction
title_short The Rationale of Coronal Approach to Malar/Zygoma Reduction
title_sort rationale of coronal approach to malar zygoma reduction
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005304
work_keys_str_mv AT jaeyoonseolmdphd therationaleofcoronalapproachtomalarzygomareduction
AT kennethkkimmdfacs therationaleofcoronalapproachtomalarzygomareduction
AT jaeyoonseolmdphd rationaleofcoronalapproachtomalarzygomareduction
AT kennethkkimmdfacs rationaleofcoronalapproachtomalarzygomareduction