Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity

Abstract Current practices of quantifying academic performance by productivity raise serious concerns about the psychological well-being of graduate students. These efforts often neglect the influence of researchers’ environment. Acknowledgments in dissertation subsections shed light on this environ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ozgur Can Seckin, Onur Varol
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-11-01
Series:EPJ Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00369-z
_version_ 1811304499709476864
author Ozgur Can Seckin
Onur Varol
author_facet Ozgur Can Seckin
Onur Varol
author_sort Ozgur Can Seckin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Current practices of quantifying academic performance by productivity raise serious concerns about the psychological well-being of graduate students. These efforts often neglect the influence of researchers’ environment. Acknowledgments in dissertation subsections shed light on this environment by providing an opportunity for students to thank the people who supported them. We analysed 26,236 acknowledgments to create an “academic support network” that reveals five distinct communities that support students along the way: Academic, Administration, Family, Friends & Colleagues, and Spiritual. We show that female students mention fewer people from each of these communities, with the exception of their families, and that their productivity is slightly lower than that of males when considering the number of publications alone. This is critically important because it means that studying the doctoral process may help us better understand the adverse conditions women face early in their academic careers. Our results also suggest that the total number of people mentioned in the acknowledgements allows disciplines to be categorised as either individual science or team science as their magnitudes change. We also show that male students who mention more people from their academic community are associated with higher levels of productivity. University rankings are found to be positively correlated with productivity and the size of academic support networks. However, neither university rankings nor students’ productivity levels correlate with the sentiments students express in their acknowledgements. Our results point to the importance of academic support networks by explaining how they differ and how they influence productivity.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:08:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-971bf954b74d4dcf87e2b7f41630957c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-1127
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:08:14Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series EPJ Data Science
spelling doaj.art-971bf954b74d4dcf87e2b7f41630957c2022-12-22T02:55:06ZengSpringerOpenEPJ Data Science2193-11272022-11-0111111510.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00369-zAcademic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivityOzgur Can Seckin0Onur Varol1Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci UniversityFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci UniversityAbstract Current practices of quantifying academic performance by productivity raise serious concerns about the psychological well-being of graduate students. These efforts often neglect the influence of researchers’ environment. Acknowledgments in dissertation subsections shed light on this environment by providing an opportunity for students to thank the people who supported them. We analysed 26,236 acknowledgments to create an “academic support network” that reveals five distinct communities that support students along the way: Academic, Administration, Family, Friends & Colleagues, and Spiritual. We show that female students mention fewer people from each of these communities, with the exception of their families, and that their productivity is slightly lower than that of males when considering the number of publications alone. This is critically important because it means that studying the doctoral process may help us better understand the adverse conditions women face early in their academic careers. Our results also suggest that the total number of people mentioned in the acknowledgements allows disciplines to be categorised as either individual science or team science as their magnitudes change. We also show that male students who mention more people from their academic community are associated with higher levels of productivity. University rankings are found to be positively correlated with productivity and the size of academic support networks. However, neither university rankings nor students’ productivity levels correlate with the sentiments students express in their acknowledgements. Our results point to the importance of academic support networks by explaining how they differ and how they influence productivity.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00369-zScience of scienceNetwork scienceText miningScientific careers
spellingShingle Ozgur Can Seckin
Onur Varol
Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity
EPJ Data Science
Science of science
Network science
Text mining
Scientific careers
title Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity
title_full Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity
title_fullStr Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity
title_full_unstemmed Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity
title_short Academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity
title_sort academic support network reflects doctoral experience and productivity
topic Science of science
Network science
Text mining
Scientific careers
url https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00369-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ozgurcanseckin academicsupportnetworkreflectsdoctoralexperienceandproductivity
AT onurvarol academicsupportnetworkreflectsdoctoralexperienceandproductivity