Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogości

The paper discusses a relatively underexamined element of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics associated with his critique of set theory. I outline Wittgenstein’s objections to the theories of Dedekind and Cantor, including the confounding of extension and intension, the faulty definition of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piotr Dehnel
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2023-01-01
Series:Analiza i Egzystencja
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.usz.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/1246/article/20012/
_version_ 1827793285601558528
author Piotr Dehnel
author_facet Piotr Dehnel
author_sort Piotr Dehnel
collection DOAJ
description The paper discusses a relatively underexamined element of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics associated with his critique of set theory. I outline Wittgenstein’s objections to the theories of Dedekind and Cantor, including the confounding of extension and intension, the faulty definition of the infinite set as infinite extension and the critique of Cantor’s diagonal proof. One of Wittgenstein’s major objections to set theory was that the concept of the size of infinite sets, which Cantor expressed by means of symbols אₒ and c, had no application, i.e. that there was no grammatical technique that could show how such expressions were to be used. Notions of set theory are, so to speak, exterior – they find themselves outdoors, outside of what we usually do. They form a discourse that takes us beyond the horizon of everydayness and commonality. They are like an engine idling of the language of mathematics.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:16:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97228ec38d6444e7b0c2a75ae6a6a68b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1734-9923
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:16:22Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
record_format Article
series Analiza i Egzystencja
spelling doaj.art-97228ec38d6444e7b0c2a75ae6a6a68b2023-10-16T07:03:26ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja1734-99232023-01-016310.18276/aie.2023.63-03Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogościPiotr Dehnel0Pomorska Szkoła Wyższa w Starogardzie GdańskimThe paper discusses a relatively underexamined element of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics associated with his critique of set theory. I outline Wittgenstein’s objections to the theories of Dedekind and Cantor, including the confounding of extension and intension, the faulty definition of the infinite set as infinite extension and the critique of Cantor’s diagonal proof. One of Wittgenstein’s major objections to set theory was that the concept of the size of infinite sets, which Cantor expressed by means of symbols אₒ and c, had no application, i.e. that there was no grammatical technique that could show how such expressions were to be used. Notions of set theory are, so to speak, exterior – they find themselves outdoors, outside of what we usually do. They form a discourse that takes us beyond the horizon of everydayness and commonality. They are like an engine idling of the language of mathematics.https://wnus.usz.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/1246/article/20012/CantorDedekindlanguageset theoryinfinitydiagonal proof.
spellingShingle Piotr Dehnel
Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogości
Analiza i Egzystencja
Cantor
Dedekind
language
set theory
infinity
diagonal proof.
title Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogości
title_full Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogości
title_fullStr Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogości
title_full_unstemmed Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogości
title_short Gramatyka nieskończoności. Ludwiga Wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogości
title_sort gramatyka nieskonczonosci ludwiga wittgensteina krytyka teorii mnogosci
topic Cantor
Dedekind
language
set theory
infinity
diagonal proof.
url https://wnus.usz.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/1246/article/20012/
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrdehnel gramatykanieskonczonosciludwigawittgensteinakrytykateoriimnogosci