The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit
The OT books, Ezra and Nehemiah, are to be considered as one book. This is more or less the common conviction of most OT scholars today. However, their redaction process raises many questions. What is their relation to the book of Chronicles, and how is their actual structure to be understood? Why d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Afrikaans |
| Published: |
AOSIS
2021-10-01
|
| Series: | Verbum et Ecclesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/2317 |
| _version_ | 1811302071916298240 |
|---|---|
| author | Hans-Georg Wuench |
| author_facet | Hans-Georg Wuench |
| author_sort | Hans-Georg Wuench |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The OT books, Ezra and Nehemiah, are to be considered as one book. This is more or less the common conviction of most OT scholars today. However, their redaction process raises many questions. What is their relation to the book of Chronicles, and how is their actual structure to be understood? Why do we find two almost identical lists of returnees from exile in Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7? What about the differences between these lists? This article understands the structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a consciously created literary unit, where the two lists of returnees serve as an important part of the literary structure. The author works on the assumption of the so-called new literary criticism, understanding the narrative in the book on a synchronic basis. He shows that the book of Ezra-Nehemiah can indeed be understood as one literary unit, and that the two lists of returnees function as a literary means to structure the book. There is therefore no need to ‘re-organise’ the narrated events in Ezra-Nehemiah according to an alleged different chronological order.
Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: The study argued for a canonical and synchronic approach to biblical narratives. The biblical texts should be understood as consciously created narratives, where the apparent discrepancies are important aspects of the narrative fixture. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:21:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-97300b188dbc4889979f8c3af2a43ba5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1609-9982 2074-7705 |
| language | Afrikaans |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:21:20Z |
| publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
| publisher | AOSIS |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verbum et Ecclesia |
| spelling | doaj.art-97300b188dbc4889979f8c3af2a43ba52022-12-22T02:56:37ZafrAOSISVerbum et Ecclesia1609-99822074-77052021-10-01421e1e910.4102/ve.v42i1.23171668The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unitHans-Georg Wuench0Department of Old Testament and Hebrew Scriptures, Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Pretoria, Pretoria; Department of Biblical and Ancient Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, PretoriaThe OT books, Ezra and Nehemiah, are to be considered as one book. This is more or less the common conviction of most OT scholars today. However, their redaction process raises many questions. What is their relation to the book of Chronicles, and how is their actual structure to be understood? Why do we find two almost identical lists of returnees from exile in Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7? What about the differences between these lists? This article understands the structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a consciously created literary unit, where the two lists of returnees serve as an important part of the literary structure. The author works on the assumption of the so-called new literary criticism, understanding the narrative in the book on a synchronic basis. He shows that the book of Ezra-Nehemiah can indeed be understood as one literary unit, and that the two lists of returnees function as a literary means to structure the book. There is therefore no need to ‘re-organise’ the narrated events in Ezra-Nehemiah according to an alleged different chronological order. Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: The study argued for a canonical and synchronic approach to biblical narratives. The biblical texts should be understood as consciously created narratives, where the apparent discrepancies are important aspects of the narrative fixture.https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/2317otezra-nehemiahstructuresynchronic exegesisexilechronicles and ezra-nehemianarratologyliterary criticism |
| spellingShingle | Hans-Georg Wuench The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit Verbum et Ecclesia ot ezra-nehemiah structure synchronic exegesis exile chronicles and ezra-nehemia narratology literary criticism |
| title | The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit |
| title_full | The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit |
| title_fullStr | The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit |
| title_full_unstemmed | The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit |
| title_short | The structure of Ezra-Nehemiah as a literary unit |
| title_sort | structure of ezra nehemiah as a literary unit |
| topic | ot ezra-nehemiah structure synchronic exegesis exile chronicles and ezra-nehemia narratology literary criticism |
| url | https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/2317 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hansgeorgwuench thestructureofezranehemiahasaliteraryunit AT hansgeorgwuench structureofezranehemiahasaliteraryunit |