Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-world

Abstract Background Embolectomy is the standard of care in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). Aim of this study was to compare two techniques: A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) and Stent-retriever Assisted Vacuum-locked Extraction (SAVE) stratified by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Brehm, Volker Maus, Ioannis Tsogkas, Ruben Colla, Amélie Carolina Hesse, Roland Gerard Gera, Marios-Nikos Psychogios
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-04-01
Series:BMC Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-019-1291-9
_version_ 1811205240365514752
author Alex Brehm
Volker Maus
Ioannis Tsogkas
Ruben Colla
Amélie Carolina Hesse
Roland Gerard Gera
Marios-Nikos Psychogios
author_facet Alex Brehm
Volker Maus
Ioannis Tsogkas
Ruben Colla
Amélie Carolina Hesse
Roland Gerard Gera
Marios-Nikos Psychogios
author_sort Alex Brehm
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Embolectomy is the standard of care in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). Aim of this study was to compare two techniques: A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) and Stent-retriever Assisted Vacuum-locked Extraction (SAVE) stratified by the occluded vessel. Methods One hundred seventy-one patients (71 male) treated between January 2014 and September 2017 with AIS due to LVO of the anterior circulation (55 carotid T, 94 M1, 22 M2) were included. Treatment techniques were divided into two categories: ADAPT and SAVE. Primary endpoints were successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b), near-perfect reperfusion (mTICI ≥2c) and groin puncture to reperfusion time. Secondary endpoints were the number of device-passes, first-pass reperfusion, the frequency of emboli to new territory (ENT), clinical outcome at 90 days, and the frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Analysis was performed on an intention to treat basis. Results Overall, SAVE resulted in significant higher rates of successful reperfusion (mTICI≥2b) compared to ADAPT (93.5% vs 75.0%; p = 0.006). After stratification for the occluded vessel only the carotid T remained significant with higher rates of near-perfect reperfusion (mTICI≥2c) (55.2% vs 15.4%; p = 0.025), while for successful reperfusion a trend remained (93.1% vs 65.4%; p = 0.10). Groin to reperfusion times were not significantly different. Secondary analysis revealed higher rates of first-pass successful reperfusion (59.6% vs 33.3%; p = 0.019), higher rates of first-pass near-perfect reperfusion in the carotid T (35.4% vs 16.7%; p = 0.038) and a lower number of device-passes overall (median 1 IQR 1–2 vs 2 IQR 2–3; p <  0.001) and in the carotid T (median 2 IQR 1.3 vs 3 IQR 2–5; p <  0.001) for SAVE. Clinical outcome and safety parameters were comparable between groups. Conclusions Embolectomy using SAVE appears superior to ADAPT, especially for carotid T occlusions with regard to reperfusion success.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:27:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-973252c1229c466d874a29b652adcf17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2377
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:27:23Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Neurology
spelling doaj.art-973252c1229c466d874a29b652adcf172022-12-22T03:49:39ZengBMCBMC Neurology1471-23772019-04-011911810.1186/s12883-019-1291-9Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-worldAlex Brehm0Volker Maus1Ioannis Tsogkas2Ruben Colla3Amélie Carolina Hesse4Roland Gerard Gera5Marios-Nikos Psychogios6Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center GoettingenDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center GoettingenDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center GoettingenDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center GoettingenDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center GoettingenDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center GoettingenDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center GoettingenAbstract Background Embolectomy is the standard of care in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). Aim of this study was to compare two techniques: A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) and Stent-retriever Assisted Vacuum-locked Extraction (SAVE) stratified by the occluded vessel. Methods One hundred seventy-one patients (71 male) treated between January 2014 and September 2017 with AIS due to LVO of the anterior circulation (55 carotid T, 94 M1, 22 M2) were included. Treatment techniques were divided into two categories: ADAPT and SAVE. Primary endpoints were successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b), near-perfect reperfusion (mTICI ≥2c) and groin puncture to reperfusion time. Secondary endpoints were the number of device-passes, first-pass reperfusion, the frequency of emboli to new territory (ENT), clinical outcome at 90 days, and the frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Analysis was performed on an intention to treat basis. Results Overall, SAVE resulted in significant higher rates of successful reperfusion (mTICI≥2b) compared to ADAPT (93.5% vs 75.0%; p = 0.006). After stratification for the occluded vessel only the carotid T remained significant with higher rates of near-perfect reperfusion (mTICI≥2c) (55.2% vs 15.4%; p = 0.025), while for successful reperfusion a trend remained (93.1% vs 65.4%; p = 0.10). Groin to reperfusion times were not significantly different. Secondary analysis revealed higher rates of first-pass successful reperfusion (59.6% vs 33.3%; p = 0.019), higher rates of first-pass near-perfect reperfusion in the carotid T (35.4% vs 16.7%; p = 0.038) and a lower number of device-passes overall (median 1 IQR 1–2 vs 2 IQR 2–3; p <  0.001) and in the carotid T (median 2 IQR 1.3 vs 3 IQR 2–5; p <  0.001) for SAVE. Clinical outcome and safety parameters were comparable between groups. Conclusions Embolectomy using SAVE appears superior to ADAPT, especially for carotid T occlusions with regard to reperfusion success.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-019-1291-9Acute ischemic strokeThrombectomyLarge vessel occlusionTechnique
spellingShingle Alex Brehm
Volker Maus
Ioannis Tsogkas
Ruben Colla
Amélie Carolina Hesse
Roland Gerard Gera
Marios-Nikos Psychogios
Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-world
BMC Neurology
Acute ischemic stroke
Thrombectomy
Large vessel occlusion
Technique
title Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-world
title_full Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-world
title_fullStr Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-world
title_full_unstemmed Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-world
title_short Stent-retriever assisted vacuum-locked extraction (SAVE) versus a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for acute stroke: data from the real-world
title_sort stent retriever assisted vacuum locked extraction save versus a direct aspiration first pass technique adapt for acute stroke data from the real world
topic Acute ischemic stroke
Thrombectomy
Large vessel occlusion
Technique
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-019-1291-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alexbrehm stentretrieverassistedvacuumlockedextractionsaveversusadirectaspirationfirstpasstechniqueadaptforacutestrokedatafromtherealworld
AT volkermaus stentretrieverassistedvacuumlockedextractionsaveversusadirectaspirationfirstpasstechniqueadaptforacutestrokedatafromtherealworld
AT ioannistsogkas stentretrieverassistedvacuumlockedextractionsaveversusadirectaspirationfirstpasstechniqueadaptforacutestrokedatafromtherealworld
AT rubencolla stentretrieverassistedvacuumlockedextractionsaveversusadirectaspirationfirstpasstechniqueadaptforacutestrokedatafromtherealworld
AT ameliecarolinahesse stentretrieverassistedvacuumlockedextractionsaveversusadirectaspirationfirstpasstechniqueadaptforacutestrokedatafromtherealworld
AT rolandgerardgera stentretrieverassistedvacuumlockedextractionsaveversusadirectaspirationfirstpasstechniqueadaptforacutestrokedatafromtherealworld
AT mariosnikospsychogios stentretrieverassistedvacuumlockedextractionsaveversusadirectaspirationfirstpasstechniqueadaptforacutestrokedatafromtherealworld