HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment

AbstractObjectives To compare pregnancy outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (HIFU), myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE) for fertility-sparing patients with uterine fibroids and to investigate the possible mechanism of improving pregnancy by HIFU.Materials and metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fang Li, Jing Chen, Li Yin, Dingyuan Zeng, Li Wang, Hua Tao, Xiajuan Wu, Feng Wei, Fan Xu, Qiuling Shi, Zhong Lin, Zhibiao Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2155077
_version_ 1797374236816310272
author Fang Li
Jing Chen
Li Yin
Dingyuan Zeng
Li Wang
Hua Tao
Xiajuan Wu
Feng Wei
Fan Xu
Qiuling Shi
Zhong Lin
Zhibiao Wang
author_facet Fang Li
Jing Chen
Li Yin
Dingyuan Zeng
Li Wang
Hua Tao
Xiajuan Wu
Feng Wei
Fan Xu
Qiuling Shi
Zhong Lin
Zhibiao Wang
author_sort Fang Li
collection DOAJ
description AbstractObjectives To compare pregnancy outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (HIFU), myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE) for fertility-sparing patients with uterine fibroids and to investigate the possible mechanism of improving pregnancy by HIFU.Materials and methods A meta-analysis of 54 studies containing 12,367 patients was conducted to compare the pregnancy outcomes of three fertility-sparing therapies. And a retrospective self-control study of 26 patients with uterine fibroids from May 2019 to December 2020 was performed to assess the blood flow impedance of bilateral uterine arteries before and after HIFU.Results In the analysis by treatment option, the pregnancy rate after myomectomy was 0.43 (95% CI 0.36–0.49), which was higher than 0.18 (95% CI 0.10–0.26) after HIFU, the latter was significantly higher than that after UAE (ratio 0.08, 95% CI 0.06–0.10). The miscarriage rate after HIFU was 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.12), which was similar to 0.15 (95% CI 0.09–0.21) after myomectomy and also similar to 0.16 after UAE (95% CI 0.01–0.30). In the subgroup analysis, women who received ultrasound guided HIFU (USgHIFU) were more likely to have ideal pregnancy outcomes than that after magnetic resonance imaging-guided HIFU. The pulsatility index and resistance index on the right side were significantly higher 3 months after HIFU than before (1.637 ± 0.435 vs. 1.845 ± 0.469; p = 0.033; 0.729 ± 0.141 vs. 0.784 ± 0.081, p = 0.039).Conclusions HIFU, especially USgHIFU, may be an alternative fertility-sparing modality for patients with uterine fibroids over 40 years old. HIFU may contribute to improving pregnancy rates by elevating uterine blood flow impedance.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:03:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-973d502d455145b4b34179e32fb571d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:03:01Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
spelling doaj.art-973d502d455145b4b34179e32fb571d12023-12-28T04:15:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572023-12-0140110.1080/02656736.2022.2155077HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatmentFang Li0Jing Chen1Li Yin2Dingyuan Zeng3Li Wang4Hua Tao5Xiajuan Wu6Feng Wei7Fan Xu8Qiuling Shi9Zhong Lin10Zhibiao Wang11State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaXiamen Maluan Bay Hospital, Xiamen, ChinaLiuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Affiliated Women and Children’s Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, ChinaLiuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Affiliated Women and Children’s Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, ChinaLiuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Affiliated Women and Children’s Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, ChinaLiuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Affiliated Women and Children’s Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, ChinaLiuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Affiliated Women and Children’s Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, ChinaNanchong Central Hospital, North Sichuan Medical University, Nanchong, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Engineering in Medicine, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaThe Reproductive Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaAbstractObjectives To compare pregnancy outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (HIFU), myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE) for fertility-sparing patients with uterine fibroids and to investigate the possible mechanism of improving pregnancy by HIFU.Materials and methods A meta-analysis of 54 studies containing 12,367 patients was conducted to compare the pregnancy outcomes of three fertility-sparing therapies. And a retrospective self-control study of 26 patients with uterine fibroids from May 2019 to December 2020 was performed to assess the blood flow impedance of bilateral uterine arteries before and after HIFU.Results In the analysis by treatment option, the pregnancy rate after myomectomy was 0.43 (95% CI 0.36–0.49), which was higher than 0.18 (95% CI 0.10–0.26) after HIFU, the latter was significantly higher than that after UAE (ratio 0.08, 95% CI 0.06–0.10). The miscarriage rate after HIFU was 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.12), which was similar to 0.15 (95% CI 0.09–0.21) after myomectomy and also similar to 0.16 after UAE (95% CI 0.01–0.30). In the subgroup analysis, women who received ultrasound guided HIFU (USgHIFU) were more likely to have ideal pregnancy outcomes than that after magnetic resonance imaging-guided HIFU. The pulsatility index and resistance index on the right side were significantly higher 3 months after HIFU than before (1.637 ± 0.435 vs. 1.845 ± 0.469; p = 0.033; 0.729 ± 0.141 vs. 0.784 ± 0.081, p = 0.039).Conclusions HIFU, especially USgHIFU, may be an alternative fertility-sparing modality for patients with uterine fibroids over 40 years old. HIFU may contribute to improving pregnancy rates by elevating uterine blood flow impedance.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2155077HIFUfertility-sparing treatmentpregnancy outcomesuterine fibroidsblood flow impedance
spellingShingle Fang Li
Jing Chen
Li Yin
Dingyuan Zeng
Li Wang
Hua Tao
Xiajuan Wu
Feng Wei
Fan Xu
Qiuling Shi
Zhong Lin
Zhibiao Wang
HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment
International Journal of Hyperthermia
HIFU
fertility-sparing treatment
pregnancy outcomes
uterine fibroids
blood flow impedance
title HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment
title_full HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment
title_fullStr HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment
title_full_unstemmed HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment
title_short HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment
title_sort hifu as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility sparing treatment
topic HIFU
fertility-sparing treatment
pregnancy outcomes
uterine fibroids
blood flow impedance
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2155077
work_keys_str_mv AT fangli hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT jingchen hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT liyin hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT dingyuanzeng hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT liwang hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT huatao hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT xiajuanwu hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT fengwei hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT fanxu hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT qiulingshi hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT zhonglin hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment
AT zhibiaowang hifuasanalternativemodalityforpatientswithuterinefibroidswhorequirefertilitysparingtreatment