Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’

The article discusses the development of complex items that may carry grammatical as well as pragmatic functions. We describe the development of the Estonian complex conjunction nii et ‘so that’ which started out as the free combination of the proadverb nii ‘so’ and the conjunction et ‘that’, and ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anni Jürine, Külli Habicht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2017-09-01
Series:Eesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/15104
_version_ 1811281910379315200
author Anni Jürine
Külli Habicht
author_facet Anni Jürine
Külli Habicht
author_sort Anni Jürine
collection DOAJ
description The article discusses the development of complex items that may carry grammatical as well as pragmatic functions. We describe the development of the Estonian complex conjunction nii et ‘so that’ which started out as the free combination of the proadverb nii ‘so’ and the conjunction et ‘that’, and has currently reached the stage of pragmatic marker located at the sentence-peripheral position and expressing CONCLUSION. The synchronic corpus study analyzes 862 examples and observes the functional and the formal variation of nii et ‘so that’, ‘so’ as well as the association between them. The data suggests that nii et has four formal variants (nii, et; nii et; niiet; niet) and its functions have developed in the following chain: MANNER > CONSEQUENCE > CONCLUSION. The data suggest an association between the functional and formal variation. The development of nii et displays the main mechanisms of grammaticalization (desemanticization, decategorialization, extension, erosion) and is associated with re-cycling of grammar, and pragmatic roles of sentence peripheries. Kokkuvõte. Anni Jürine ja Külli Habicht: Liitsete üksuste grammatiseerumine: eesti keele nii et. Artiklis käsitletakse liitüksuste grammatiseerumist (pragmatiseerumist) eesti ühendsidesõna nii et näitel. See algselt eri lauseosadesse kuulunud sidendav üksus on reanalüüsitud esmalt alistatud osalauset alustavaks ühendsidesõnaks ja lõpuks lause perifeeriatesse paiknevaks pragmaatiliseks partikliks. Sünkroonilises korpusuuringus analüüsitakse 862 kasutusjuhtu ning selgitatakse välja vormi ja funktsiooni seosed grammatiseerumisprotsessis. Üksusel on neli vormivarianti (nii, et; nii et; niiet; niet) ja tema funktsioonid on kujunenud ahelas VIIS > TAGAJÄRG > JÄRELDUS. Üksuse areng järgib grammatiseerumise keskseid mehhanisme (desemantiseerumine, dekategoriseerumine, ekstensioon, erosioon) ja on seotud grammatika taaskasutuse, insubordinatsiooni ning lause perifeeriate pragmaatiliste rollidega. Võtmesõnad: liitne grammatikaüksus; pragmaatiline partikkel; grammatiseerumine; pragmatiseerumine; grammatika taaskasutus; lause perifeeriad; insubordinatsioon; eesti keel
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:43:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-973d95f11086405285b7bb856b5253b2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1736-8987
2228-1339
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:43:19Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher University of Tartu Press
record_format Article
series Eesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri
spelling doaj.art-973d95f11086405285b7bb856b5253b22022-12-22T03:08:08ZengUniversity of Tartu PressEesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri1736-89872228-13392017-09-018210.12697/jeful.2017.8.2.02Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’Anni Jürine0Külli Habicht1Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, University of Tartu, Jakobi 2, 51014 TartuInstitute of Estonian and General Linguistics, University of Tartu, Jakobi 2, 51014 TartuThe article discusses the development of complex items that may carry grammatical as well as pragmatic functions. We describe the development of the Estonian complex conjunction nii et ‘so that’ which started out as the free combination of the proadverb nii ‘so’ and the conjunction et ‘that’, and has currently reached the stage of pragmatic marker located at the sentence-peripheral position and expressing CONCLUSION. The synchronic corpus study analyzes 862 examples and observes the functional and the formal variation of nii et ‘so that’, ‘so’ as well as the association between them. The data suggests that nii et has four formal variants (nii, et; nii et; niiet; niet) and its functions have developed in the following chain: MANNER > CONSEQUENCE > CONCLUSION. The data suggest an association between the functional and formal variation. The development of nii et displays the main mechanisms of grammaticalization (desemanticization, decategorialization, extension, erosion) and is associated with re-cycling of grammar, and pragmatic roles of sentence peripheries. Kokkuvõte. Anni Jürine ja Külli Habicht: Liitsete üksuste grammatiseerumine: eesti keele nii et. Artiklis käsitletakse liitüksuste grammatiseerumist (pragmatiseerumist) eesti ühendsidesõna nii et näitel. See algselt eri lauseosadesse kuulunud sidendav üksus on reanalüüsitud esmalt alistatud osalauset alustavaks ühendsidesõnaks ja lõpuks lause perifeeriatesse paiknevaks pragmaatiliseks partikliks. Sünkroonilises korpusuuringus analüüsitakse 862 kasutusjuhtu ning selgitatakse välja vormi ja funktsiooni seosed grammatiseerumisprotsessis. Üksusel on neli vormivarianti (nii, et; nii et; niiet; niet) ja tema funktsioonid on kujunenud ahelas VIIS > TAGAJÄRG > JÄRELDUS. Üksuse areng järgib grammatiseerumise keskseid mehhanisme (desemantiseerumine, dekategoriseerumine, ekstensioon, erosioon) ja on seotud grammatika taaskasutuse, insubordinatsiooni ning lause perifeeriate pragmaatiliste rollidega. Võtmesõnad: liitne grammatikaüksus; pragmaatiline partikkel; grammatiseerumine; pragmatiseerumine; grammatika taaskasutus; lause perifeeriad; insubordinatsioon; eesti keelhttps://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/15104complex grammatical itempragmatic particlegrammaticalizationpragmaticalizationrecycling of grammarsentence peripheries
spellingShingle Anni Jürine
Külli Habicht
Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’
Eesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri
complex grammatical item
pragmatic particle
grammaticalization
pragmaticalization
recycling of grammar
sentence peripheries
title Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’
title_full Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’
title_fullStr Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’
title_full_unstemmed Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’
title_short Grammaticalization of complex items: Estonian <i>nii et</i> ‘so that’, ‘so’
title_sort grammaticalization of complex items estonian i nii et i so that so
topic complex grammatical item
pragmatic particle
grammaticalization
pragmaticalization
recycling of grammar
sentence peripheries
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/15104
work_keys_str_mv AT annijurine grammaticalizationofcomplexitemsestonianiniietisothatso
AT kullihabicht grammaticalizationofcomplexitemsestonianiniietisothatso