The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform

During the 1990s and 2000s, a policy known as Education with Community Participation (EDUCO) not only became the cornerstone of education reform in El Salvador but also became a global education policy, one which is known for decentralizing to rural families the responsibility for hiring and firing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Brent Edwards, Jr., Claudia Elizabeth Loucel Urquilla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2016-09-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2019
_version_ 1828498162213453824
author D. Brent Edwards, Jr.
Claudia Elizabeth Loucel Urquilla
author_facet D. Brent Edwards, Jr.
Claudia Elizabeth Loucel Urquilla
author_sort D. Brent Edwards, Jr.
collection DOAJ
description During the 1990s and 2000s, a policy known as Education with Community Participation (EDUCO) not only became the cornerstone of education reform in El Salvador but also became a global education policy, one which is known for decentralizing to rural families the responsibility for hiring and firing teachers. As is shown in this paper, its rise to fame was not only a product of the particular political-economic context in which it was borne, but was also a product of the impact evaluations produced by the World Bank, which served as the evidence base through which this and other international institutions could legitimately promote the neoliberal model of community involvement represented by EDUCO. Problematically, however, a reappraisal of these impact evaluations reveals, first, that their findings and conclusions around significant effects were not warranted and, second, that the entire impact evaluation enterprise is fundamentally flawed due to the financial-political-intellectual complex out of which these studies emerged and back into which they fed as they were used to advocate for market-oriented policy solutions around the world. Thus, in addition to explaining the reform dynamics that gave rise to EDUCO, this paper (a) systematically reviews the findings and limitations of each of the six impact studies that constitute the international knowledge base around this policy, (b) reconsiders what we can reasonably claim to know about EDUCO, (c) reflects on the national and international implications of the critical review presented here, and (d) remarks on the shortcomings of—and the alternatives to—impact evaluations as a means to produce policy-relevant findings.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:02:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-973f5c111eb142819552726206572522
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-2341
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:02:04Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Arizona State University
record_format Article
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
spelling doaj.art-973f5c111eb1428195527262065725222022-12-22T01:06:27ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412016-09-0124010.14507/epaa.24.20191537The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reformD. Brent Edwards, Jr.0Claudia Elizabeth Loucel Urquilla1University of Hawai‘i, MānoaCentro Internacional de Agricultura TropicalDuring the 1990s and 2000s, a policy known as Education with Community Participation (EDUCO) not only became the cornerstone of education reform in El Salvador but also became a global education policy, one which is known for decentralizing to rural families the responsibility for hiring and firing teachers. As is shown in this paper, its rise to fame was not only a product of the particular political-economic context in which it was borne, but was also a product of the impact evaluations produced by the World Bank, which served as the evidence base through which this and other international institutions could legitimately promote the neoliberal model of community involvement represented by EDUCO. Problematically, however, a reappraisal of these impact evaluations reveals, first, that their findings and conclusions around significant effects were not warranted and, second, that the entire impact evaluation enterprise is fundamentally flawed due to the financial-political-intellectual complex out of which these studies emerged and back into which they fed as they were used to advocate for market-oriented policy solutions around the world. Thus, in addition to explaining the reform dynamics that gave rise to EDUCO, this paper (a) systematically reviews the findings and limitations of each of the six impact studies that constitute the international knowledge base around this policy, (b) reconsiders what we can reasonably claim to know about EDUCO, (c) reflects on the national and international implications of the critical review presented here, and (d) remarks on the shortcomings of—and the alternatives to—impact evaluations as a means to produce policy-relevant findings.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2019El SalvadordescentralizaciónEDUCO, Banco Mundialeconomía políticaproducción de conocimientoreforma educativa global
spellingShingle D. Brent Edwards, Jr.
Claudia Elizabeth Loucel Urquilla
The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform
Education Policy Analysis Archives
El Salvador
descentralización
EDUCO, Banco Mundial
economía política
producción de conocimiento
reforma educativa global
title The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform
title_full The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform
title_fullStr The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform
title_full_unstemmed The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform
title_short The EDUCO program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform
title_sort educo program impact evaluations and the political economy of global education reform
topic El Salvador
descentralización
EDUCO, Banco Mundial
economía política
producción de conocimiento
reforma educativa global
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2019
work_keys_str_mv AT dbrentedwardsjr theeducoprogramimpactevaluationsandthepoliticaleconomyofglobaleducationreform
AT claudiaelizabethloucelurquilla theeducoprogramimpactevaluationsandthepoliticaleconomyofglobaleducationreform
AT dbrentedwardsjr educoprogramimpactevaluationsandthepoliticaleconomyofglobaleducationreform
AT claudiaelizabethloucelurquilla educoprogramimpactevaluationsandthepoliticaleconomyofglobaleducationreform