Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy

(1) Background: This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of parameters based on a combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation (ES) in the differentiation between idiopathic and secondary facial palsy in a large cohort of patients. (2) Methods: Patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vera E. A. Kleinveld, Sarah Platzgummer, Julia Wanschitz, Corinne G. C. Horlings, Wolfgang N. Löscher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/13/4/624
_version_ 1797606150632374272
author Vera E. A. Kleinveld
Sarah Platzgummer
Julia Wanschitz
Corinne G. C. Horlings
Wolfgang N. Löscher
author_facet Vera E. A. Kleinveld
Sarah Platzgummer
Julia Wanschitz
Corinne G. C. Horlings
Wolfgang N. Löscher
author_sort Vera E. A. Kleinveld
collection DOAJ
description (1) Background: This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of parameters based on a combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation (ES) in the differentiation between idiopathic and secondary facial palsy in a large cohort of patients. (2) Methods: Patients with unilateral facial palsy ≤7 days after symptom onset were included. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes were measured after stimulation of both facial nerves at (A) the internal acoustic meatus using TMS, CMAP-TMS, and (B) at the stylomastoid foramen using electrical stimulation, CMAP-ES. To express the degree of nerve dysfunction in the facial canal specifically, the amplitude reduction of the CMAP-TMS in relation to CMAP-ES was calculated and expressed as a percentage (amplitude reduction over the facial canal, ARFC). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ARFC as a marker to discriminate between patients with idiopathic and secondary facial palsy. (3) Results: Data from 498 patient records were analyzed. Idiopathic facial palsy was diagnosed in 424 patients, and secondary facial palsy in 74 patients. The area under the ROC curve for ARFC was 0.398. (4) Conclusions: The overall diagnostic accuracy of this method to differentiate secondary from idiopathic facial palsy is low.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:11:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97417e8521f84f89961c9d36f72d7ece
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:11:13Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-97417e8521f84f89961c9d36f72d7ece2023-11-17T18:32:47ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252023-04-0113462410.3390/brainsci13040624Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve PalsyVera E. A. Kleinveld0Sarah Platzgummer1Julia Wanschitz2Corinne G. C. Horlings3Wolfgang N. Löscher4Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria(1) Background: This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of parameters based on a combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation (ES) in the differentiation between idiopathic and secondary facial palsy in a large cohort of patients. (2) Methods: Patients with unilateral facial palsy ≤7 days after symptom onset were included. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes were measured after stimulation of both facial nerves at (A) the internal acoustic meatus using TMS, CMAP-TMS, and (B) at the stylomastoid foramen using electrical stimulation, CMAP-ES. To express the degree of nerve dysfunction in the facial canal specifically, the amplitude reduction of the CMAP-TMS in relation to CMAP-ES was calculated and expressed as a percentage (amplitude reduction over the facial canal, ARFC). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ARFC as a marker to discriminate between patients with idiopathic and secondary facial palsy. (3) Results: Data from 498 patient records were analyzed. Idiopathic facial palsy was diagnosed in 424 patients, and secondary facial palsy in 74 patients. The area under the ROC curve for ARFC was 0.398. (4) Conclusions: The overall diagnostic accuracy of this method to differentiate secondary from idiopathic facial palsy is low.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/13/4/624facial nervefacial palsyBell’s palsytranscranial magnetic stimulationnerve conduction study
spellingShingle Vera E. A. Kleinveld
Sarah Platzgummer
Julia Wanschitz
Corinne G. C. Horlings
Wolfgang N. Löscher
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy
Brain Sciences
facial nerve
facial palsy
Bell’s palsy
transcranial magnetic stimulation
nerve conduction study
title Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy
title_full Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy
title_fullStr Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy
title_short Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy
title_sort transcranial magnetic stimulation in the differential diagnosis of unilateral peripheral facial nerve palsy
topic facial nerve
facial palsy
Bell’s palsy
transcranial magnetic stimulation
nerve conduction study
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/13/4/624
work_keys_str_mv AT veraeakleinveld transcranialmagneticstimulationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofunilateralperipheralfacialnervepalsy
AT sarahplatzgummer transcranialmagneticstimulationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofunilateralperipheralfacialnervepalsy
AT juliawanschitz transcranialmagneticstimulationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofunilateralperipheralfacialnervepalsy
AT corinnegchorlings transcranialmagneticstimulationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofunilateralperipheralfacialnervepalsy
AT wolfgangnloscher transcranialmagneticstimulationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofunilateralperipheralfacialnervepalsy