Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu

General elections in Indonesia have shifted a lot motivated by efforts to seek their ideal form. The last time, elections were held simultaneously by combining the five types of elections stipulated in Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution. The various complexities and challenges of the 2019 election...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdul Basid Fuadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2022-02-01
Series:Jurnal Konstitusi
Online Access:https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1910
_version_ 1797900856414175232
author Abdul Basid Fuadi
author_facet Abdul Basid Fuadi
author_sort Abdul Basid Fuadi
collection DOAJ
description General elections in Indonesia have shifted a lot motivated by efforts to seek their ideal form. The last time, elections were held simultaneously by combining the five types of elections stipulated in Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution. The various complexities and challenges of the 2019 election should be evaluated. Elections basically have two main objectives, 1) to produce a government that represents every element in society; 2) create a government that is able to govern well. This paper discusses about the complexity and challenges of the 2019 simultaneous election and how the ideal election timing is designed. This research uses normative legal research methods (legal research) with two approaches: normative approach and conceptual approach. This study resulted, first, there were technical complications in the 2019 Concurrent Election, namely the workload of the organizers, especially the KPPS; a significant increase in the election budget; and voter confusion due to too many types of elections which implicated too many candidate lists. Second, the Constitutional Court has determined six electoral models as well as constitutional ones, and this can be considered as judicial law politics. Lawmakers must immediately act on the Constitutional Court's decision by amending the electoral law which adopts one of the simultaneous election models.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:52:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-974c36d70e8e40f286abcb454931c2cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1829-7706
2548-1657
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:52:34Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal Konstitusi
spelling doaj.art-974c36d70e8e40f286abcb454931c2cd2023-02-22T04:09:46ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572022-02-0118310.31078/jk18310556Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan PemiluAbdul Basid Fuadi0The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, IndonesiaGeneral elections in Indonesia have shifted a lot motivated by efforts to seek their ideal form. The last time, elections were held simultaneously by combining the five types of elections stipulated in Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution. The various complexities and challenges of the 2019 election should be evaluated. Elections basically have two main objectives, 1) to produce a government that represents every element in society; 2) create a government that is able to govern well. This paper discusses about the complexity and challenges of the 2019 simultaneous election and how the ideal election timing is designed. This research uses normative legal research methods (legal research) with two approaches: normative approach and conceptual approach. This study resulted, first, there were technical complications in the 2019 Concurrent Election, namely the workload of the organizers, especially the KPPS; a significant increase in the election budget; and voter confusion due to too many types of elections which implicated too many candidate lists. Second, the Constitutional Court has determined six electoral models as well as constitutional ones, and this can be considered as judicial law politics. Lawmakers must immediately act on the Constitutional Court's decision by amending the electoral law which adopts one of the simultaneous election models.https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1910
spellingShingle Abdul Basid Fuadi
Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu
Jurnal Konstitusi
title Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu
title_full Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu
title_fullStr Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu
title_full_unstemmed Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu
title_short Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu
title_sort politik hukum pengaturan keserentakan pemilu
url https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1910
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulbasidfuadi politikhukumpengaturankeserentakanpemilu