Thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs

Abstract Environmental temperature affects physiological functions, representing a barrier for the range expansions of ectothermic species. To understand the link between thermal physiology and biogeography, a key question is whether among-species thermal sensitivity of metabolic rates is mechanisti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuuki Y. Watanabe, Nicholas L. Payne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-04-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37637-z
_version_ 1797836364899680256
author Yuuki Y. Watanabe
Nicholas L. Payne
author_facet Yuuki Y. Watanabe
Nicholas L. Payne
author_sort Yuuki Y. Watanabe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Environmental temperature affects physiological functions, representing a barrier for the range expansions of ectothermic species. To understand the link between thermal physiology and biogeography, a key question is whether among-species thermal sensitivity of metabolic rates is mechanistically constrained or buffered through physiological remodeling over evolutionary time. The former conception, the Universal Temperature Dependence hypothesis, predicts similar among- and within-species thermal sensitivity. The latter conception, the Metabolic Cold Adaptation hypothesis, predicts lower among-species thermal sensitivity than within-species sensitivity. Previous studies that tested these hypotheses for fishes overwhelmingly investigated teleosts with elasmobranchs understudied. Here, we show that among-species thermal sensitivity of resting metabolic rates is lower than within-species sensitivity in teleosts but not in elasmobranchs. Further, species richness declines with latitude more rapidly in elasmobranchs than in teleosts. Metabolic Cold Adaptation exhibited by teleosts might underpin their high diversity at high latitudes, whereas the inflexible thermal sensitivity approximated by Universal Temperature Dependence of elasmobranchs might explain their low diversity at high latitudes.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:08:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-974dc7b2c02c47e4899d66e3418a890f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:08:44Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-974dc7b2c02c47e4899d66e3418a890f2023-04-30T11:21:30ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232023-04-011411810.1038/s41467-023-37637-zThermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchsYuuki Y. Watanabe0Nicholas L. Payne1National Institute of Polar ResearchSchool of Natural Sciences, Trinity College DublinAbstract Environmental temperature affects physiological functions, representing a barrier for the range expansions of ectothermic species. To understand the link between thermal physiology and biogeography, a key question is whether among-species thermal sensitivity of metabolic rates is mechanistically constrained or buffered through physiological remodeling over evolutionary time. The former conception, the Universal Temperature Dependence hypothesis, predicts similar among- and within-species thermal sensitivity. The latter conception, the Metabolic Cold Adaptation hypothesis, predicts lower among-species thermal sensitivity than within-species sensitivity. Previous studies that tested these hypotheses for fishes overwhelmingly investigated teleosts with elasmobranchs understudied. Here, we show that among-species thermal sensitivity of resting metabolic rates is lower than within-species sensitivity in teleosts but not in elasmobranchs. Further, species richness declines with latitude more rapidly in elasmobranchs than in teleosts. Metabolic Cold Adaptation exhibited by teleosts might underpin their high diversity at high latitudes, whereas the inflexible thermal sensitivity approximated by Universal Temperature Dependence of elasmobranchs might explain their low diversity at high latitudes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37637-z
spellingShingle Yuuki Y. Watanabe
Nicholas L. Payne
Thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs
Nature Communications
title Thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs
title_full Thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs
title_fullStr Thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs
title_full_unstemmed Thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs
title_short Thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs
title_sort thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate mirrors biogeographic differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37637-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yuukiywatanabe thermalsensitivityofmetabolicratemirrorsbiogeographicdifferencesbetweenteleostsandelasmobranchs
AT nicholaslpayne thermalsensitivityofmetabolicratemirrorsbiogeographicdifferencesbetweenteleostsandelasmobranchs