Qualitative Research—Unity and Diversity
The paper argues that while qualitative research has been flourishing in many fields of the social sciences, it has become unhelpfully fragmented and incoherent. Equally, there have developed a number of specialist domains of qualitative research that are too often treated in isolation. It is argued...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FQS
2005-09-01
|
Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/4 |
_version_ | 1819139621637849088 |
---|---|
author | Paul Atkinson |
author_facet | Paul Atkinson |
author_sort | Paul Atkinson |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The paper argues that while qualitative research has been flourishing in many fields of the social sciences, it has become unhelpfully fragmented and incoherent. Equally, there have developed a number of specialist domains of qualitative research that are too often treated in isolation. It is argued that we need to return to some fundamental principles of ethnographic inquiry that recognise the multiple modalities of social action and cultural representation, while locating them within a wider ethnographic framework. We need to recognise the intrinsic, indigenous principles of order and organisation that permeate social forms—discursive, visual, and material. Such formal ethnography provides a way of renewing classic ideas such as "grounded theory", "triangulation" and "thick description".
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503261 |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T11:25:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9755350218454967b7cf938a7c1e96a5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1438-5627 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T11:25:35Z |
publishDate | 2005-09-01 |
publisher | FQS |
record_format | Article |
series | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
spelling | doaj.art-9755350218454967b7cf938a7c1e96a52022-12-21T18:27:45ZdeuFQSForum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272005-09-01633Qualitative Research—Unity and DiversityPaul Atkinson0Cardiff UniversityThe paper argues that while qualitative research has been flourishing in many fields of the social sciences, it has become unhelpfully fragmented and incoherent. Equally, there have developed a number of specialist domains of qualitative research that are too often treated in isolation. It is argued that we need to return to some fundamental principles of ethnographic inquiry that recognise the multiple modalities of social action and cultural representation, while locating them within a wider ethnographic framework. We need to recognise the intrinsic, indigenous principles of order and organisation that permeate social forms—discursive, visual, and material. Such formal ethnography provides a way of renewing classic ideas such as "grounded theory", "triangulation" and "thick description". URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503261http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/4ethnographythick descriptiontriangulationgrounded theorydiscoursevisual ethnographymaterial culture |
spellingShingle | Paul Atkinson Qualitative Research—Unity and Diversity Forum: Qualitative Social Research ethnography thick description triangulation grounded theory discourse visual ethnography material culture |
title | Qualitative Research—Unity and Diversity |
title_full | Qualitative Research—Unity and Diversity |
title_fullStr | Qualitative Research—Unity and Diversity |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative Research—Unity and Diversity |
title_short | Qualitative Research—Unity and Diversity |
title_sort | qualitative research unity and diversity |
topic | ethnography thick description triangulation grounded theory discourse visual ethnography material culture |
url | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulatkinson qualitativeresearchunityanddiversity |