Impact of Material on Response and Calibration of Particle Number Systems

In Europe and Asia, vehicle emissions regulations include a number limit for particles larger than 23 nm, which might be reduced to 10 nm in the future. A particle number system (LABS) consists of a volatile particle remover (VPR) and a particle number counter (PNC). However, it is not simple to der...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barouch Giechaskiel, Anastasios Melas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/11/1770
Description
Summary:In Europe and Asia, vehicle emissions regulations include a number limit for particles larger than 23 nm, which might be reduced to 10 nm in the future. A particle number system (LABS) consists of a volatile particle remover (VPR) and a particle number counter (PNC). However, it is not simple to derive the combined penetration (efficiency), because the parts are calibrated separately at different sizes and with different materials. On the other hand, portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) for real-driving emissions (RDE) testing or counters for periodical technical inspection (PTI) of vehicle exhaust are calibrated as complete units with soot-like aerosol. The aim of this study is to estimate the efficiency of a LABS using different materials (soot, graphite, salt, silver, emery oil), typically used for the calibration of LABS, PEMS or PTI counters. The results show that appropriate selection of the calibration material is important in order to have representative of the reality efficiencies. The impact is very high for 23 nm systems, but less critical for 10 nm systems. The estimation of a mean size based on the ratio of 23 nm and 10 nm measurements and the correction of the losses in the sub-23 nm region are also discussed.
ISSN:2073-4433