Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)

This research consisted of a quantitative assessment, and aimed to measure the possible discrepancies between the maxillomandibular positions for centric relation (CR) and maximum intercuspation (MI), using computed tomography volumetric cone beam (cone beam method). The sample of the study consiste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda de Freitas Ferreira, João César Guimarães Henriques, Guilherme Araújo Almeida, Asbel Rodrigues Machado, Naila Aparecida de Godoi Machado, Alfredo Júlio Fernandes Neto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000700006
_version_ 1819292420261543936
author Amanda de Freitas Ferreira
João César Guimarães Henriques
Guilherme Araújo Almeida
Asbel Rodrigues Machado
Naila Aparecida de Godoi Machado
Alfredo Júlio Fernandes Neto
author_facet Amanda de Freitas Ferreira
João César Guimarães Henriques
Guilherme Araújo Almeida
Asbel Rodrigues Machado
Naila Aparecida de Godoi Machado
Alfredo Júlio Fernandes Neto
author_sort Amanda de Freitas Ferreira
collection DOAJ
description This research consisted of a quantitative assessment, and aimed to measure the possible discrepancies between the maxillomandibular positions for centric relation (CR) and maximum intercuspation (MI), using computed tomography volumetric cone beam (cone beam method). The sample of the study consisted of 10 asymptomatic young adult patients divided into two types of standard occlusion: normal occlusion and Angle Class I occlusion. In order to obtain the centric relation, a JIG device and mandible manipulation were used to deprogram the habitual conditions of the jaw. The evaluations were conducted in both frontal and lateral tomographic images, showing the condyle/articular fossa relation. The images were processed in the software included in the NewTom 3G device (QR NNT software version 2.00), and 8 tomographic images were obtained per patient, four laterally and four frontally exhibiting the TMA's (in CR and MI, on both sides, right and left). By means of tools included in another software, linear and angular measurements were performed and statistically analyzed by student t test. According to the methodology and the analysis performed in asymptomatic patients, it was not possible to detect statistically significant differences between the positions of centric relation and maximum intercuspation. However, the resources of cone beam tomography are of extreme relevance to the completion of further studies that use heterogeneous groups of samples in order to compare the results.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T03:54:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9776aa9d8da24369bb37bbfd42298041
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T03:54:15Z
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher University of São Paulo
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
spelling doaj.art-9776aa9d8da24369bb37bbfd422980412022-12-21T17:16:31ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652009-01-0117spe273410.1590/S1678-77572009000700006Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)Amanda de Freitas FerreiraJoão César Guimarães HenriquesGuilherme Araújo AlmeidaAsbel Rodrigues MachadoNaila Aparecida de Godoi MachadoAlfredo Júlio Fernandes NetoThis research consisted of a quantitative assessment, and aimed to measure the possible discrepancies between the maxillomandibular positions for centric relation (CR) and maximum intercuspation (MI), using computed tomography volumetric cone beam (cone beam method). The sample of the study consisted of 10 asymptomatic young adult patients divided into two types of standard occlusion: normal occlusion and Angle Class I occlusion. In order to obtain the centric relation, a JIG device and mandible manipulation were used to deprogram the habitual conditions of the jaw. The evaluations were conducted in both frontal and lateral tomographic images, showing the condyle/articular fossa relation. The images were processed in the software included in the NewTom 3G device (QR NNT software version 2.00), and 8 tomographic images were obtained per patient, four laterally and four frontally exhibiting the TMA's (in CR and MI, on both sides, right and left). By means of tools included in another software, linear and angular measurements were performed and statistically analyzed by student t test. According to the methodology and the analysis performed in asymptomatic patients, it was not possible to detect statistically significant differences between the positions of centric relation and maximum intercuspation. However, the resources of cone beam tomography are of extreme relevance to the completion of further studies that use heterogeneous groups of samples in order to compare the results.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000700006Computed tomographyCentric relationOcclusion
spellingShingle Amanda de Freitas Ferreira
João César Guimarães Henriques
Guilherme Araújo Almeida
Asbel Rodrigues Machado
Naila Aparecida de Godoi Machado
Alfredo Júlio Fernandes Neto
Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Computed tomography
Centric relation
Occlusion
title Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)
title_full Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)
title_fullStr Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)
title_short Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM)
title_sort comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography cone beam
topic Computed tomography
Centric relation
Occlusion
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000700006
work_keys_str_mv AT amandadefreitasferreira comparativeanalysisbetweenmandibularpositionsincentricrelationandmaximumintercuspationbyconebeamcomputedtomographyconebeam
AT joaocesarguimaraeshenriques comparativeanalysisbetweenmandibularpositionsincentricrelationandmaximumintercuspationbyconebeamcomputedtomographyconebeam
AT guilhermearaujoalmeida comparativeanalysisbetweenmandibularpositionsincentricrelationandmaximumintercuspationbyconebeamcomputedtomographyconebeam
AT asbelrodriguesmachado comparativeanalysisbetweenmandibularpositionsincentricrelationandmaximumintercuspationbyconebeamcomputedtomographyconebeam
AT nailaaparecidadegodoimachado comparativeanalysisbetweenmandibularpositionsincentricrelationandmaximumintercuspationbyconebeamcomputedtomographyconebeam
AT alfredojuliofernandesneto comparativeanalysisbetweenmandibularpositionsincentricrelationandmaximumintercuspationbyconebeamcomputedtomographyconebeam