Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital Objects

Long-term preservation of digital objects requires curators to be able to guarantee the archival authenticity of the objects in a digital repository. In IJDC 4(1), Ronald Jantz suggested that a digital certificate is sufficient to ensure authenticity. The letter writer takes issue with this view...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew Wilson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2009-10-01
Series:International Journal of Digital Curation
Online Access:https://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/100
_version_ 1797323854738096128
author Andrew Wilson
author_facet Andrew Wilson
author_sort Andrew Wilson
collection DOAJ
description Long-term preservation of digital objects requires curators to be able to guarantee the archival authenticity of the objects in a digital repository. In IJDC 4(1), Ronald Jantz suggested that a digital certificate is sufficient to ensure authenticity. The letter writer takes issue with this view and points out some of the archival misinterpretations in the Jantz article. He maintains that the archival literature is a rich source for discussions of authenticity that has been ignored to the detriment of Jantz’s arguments.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T05:34:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-977a59b24a2f405a8ef9043bbb7b7420
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-8256
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T05:34:09Z
publishDate 2009-10-01
publisher University of Edinburgh
record_format Article
series International Journal of Digital Curation
spelling doaj.art-977a59b24a2f405a8ef9043bbb7b74202024-02-06T00:07:37ZengUniversity of EdinburghInternational Journal of Digital Curation1746-82562009-10-0142Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital ObjectsAndrew Wilson Long-term preservation of digital objects requires curators to be able to guarantee the archival authenticity of the objects in a digital repository. In IJDC 4(1), Ronald Jantz suggested that a digital certificate is sufficient to ensure authenticity. The letter writer takes issue with this view and points out some of the archival misinterpretations in the Jantz article. He maintains that the archival literature is a rich source for discussions of authenticity that has been ignored to the detriment of Jantz’s arguments. https://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/100
spellingShingle Andrew Wilson
Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital Objects
International Journal of Digital Curation
title Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital Objects
title_full Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital Objects
title_fullStr Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital Objects
title_full_unstemmed Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital Objects
title_short Letter to the Editor: Authentic Digital Objects
title_sort letter to the editor authentic digital objects
url https://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/100
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewwilson lettertotheeditorauthenticdigitalobjects