Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients

Leorah Freeman,1 Arianna Kee,2 Marc Tian,2 Rina Mehta2 1Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA; 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USACorrespondence: Leorah FreemanHealth Discovery Building, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity Street, Aust...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freeman L, Kee A, Tian M, Mehta R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-01-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/evaluating-treatment-patterns-relapses-healthcare-resource-utilization-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
_version_ 1818325699649339392
author Freeman L
Kee A
Tian M
Mehta R
author_facet Freeman L
Kee A
Tian M
Mehta R
author_sort Freeman L
collection DOAJ
description Leorah Freeman,1 Arianna Kee,2 Marc Tian,2 Rina Mehta2 1Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA; 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USACorrespondence: Leorah FreemanHealth Discovery Building, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity Street, Austin, TX 78701, USATel + 1-512-495-5355Email leorah.freeman@austin.utexas.eduPurpose: Early diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) with disease-modifying therapy (DMT) can reduce relapse number and severity, which has cost implications. We describe treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and cost among MS patients newly initiating DMTs (index).Patients and Methods: DMT-naïve adults with 12 months’ continuous enrollment pre- and post-index and ≥ 2 MS claims (2009‒2018) were identified from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database. Treatment adherence and persistence were measured as time on index DMT. Relapses were identified using a validated claims-based algorithm. All-cause and MS-related healthcare expenditures and utilization were captured pre- and post-index. Outcomes were stratified by route of administration. Multivariate analyses assessed differences in outcomes and costs.Results: The analysis included 5906 MS patients (mean age, 46.6 years). The majority initiated injectable (63.5%) followed by oral (28.8%) and infusion (7.7%) DMTs. Post-index, 45.3% of patients were nonadherent and 39.4% were nonpersistent. Relapse rates decreased from pre- to post-index (oral: 24.3%‒16.1%; injectable: 25.0%‒17.1%; infusion: 29.3%‒15.5%). Post-index mean (SD) all-cause total costs were lowest with oral ($70,970 [$36,681]) vs injectable ($82,521 [$58,569]) and infusion ($80,871 [$49,627]) DMTs. MS-related total costs were lowest with oral ($65,149 [$65,133]) vs injectable ($76,197 [$60,204]) and infusion ($72,703 [$47,287]) DMTs. Multivariate analysis showed no differences between oral and injectable DMTs in adherence, persistence, or relapse rate; however, oral DMTs had significantly lower all-cause and MS-related costs.Conclusion: With similar outcomes across DMT administration routes, initiating the least costly DMT may be warranted for many patients. In newly treated MS patients, the need exists to improve adherence and persistence.Keywords: administrative claims, healthcare costs, treatment adherence and compliance, drug administration routes
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:48:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-978555d2b1af4471aca296ca52c6d789
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:48:38Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj.art-978555d2b1af4471aca296ca52c6d7892022-12-21T23:47:26ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812021-01-01Volume 13657561367Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve PatientsFreeman LKee ATian MMehta RLeorah Freeman,1 Arianna Kee,2 Marc Tian,2 Rina Mehta2 1Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA; 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USACorrespondence: Leorah FreemanHealth Discovery Building, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity Street, Austin, TX 78701, USATel + 1-512-495-5355Email leorah.freeman@austin.utexas.eduPurpose: Early diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) with disease-modifying therapy (DMT) can reduce relapse number and severity, which has cost implications. We describe treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and cost among MS patients newly initiating DMTs (index).Patients and Methods: DMT-naïve adults with 12 months’ continuous enrollment pre- and post-index and ≥ 2 MS claims (2009‒2018) were identified from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database. Treatment adherence and persistence were measured as time on index DMT. Relapses were identified using a validated claims-based algorithm. All-cause and MS-related healthcare expenditures and utilization were captured pre- and post-index. Outcomes were stratified by route of administration. Multivariate analyses assessed differences in outcomes and costs.Results: The analysis included 5906 MS patients (mean age, 46.6 years). The majority initiated injectable (63.5%) followed by oral (28.8%) and infusion (7.7%) DMTs. Post-index, 45.3% of patients were nonadherent and 39.4% were nonpersistent. Relapse rates decreased from pre- to post-index (oral: 24.3%‒16.1%; injectable: 25.0%‒17.1%; infusion: 29.3%‒15.5%). Post-index mean (SD) all-cause total costs were lowest with oral ($70,970 [$36,681]) vs injectable ($82,521 [$58,569]) and infusion ($80,871 [$49,627]) DMTs. MS-related total costs were lowest with oral ($65,149 [$65,133]) vs injectable ($76,197 [$60,204]) and infusion ($72,703 [$47,287]) DMTs. Multivariate analysis showed no differences between oral and injectable DMTs in adherence, persistence, or relapse rate; however, oral DMTs had significantly lower all-cause and MS-related costs.Conclusion: With similar outcomes across DMT administration routes, initiating the least costly DMT may be warranted for many patients. In newly treated MS patients, the need exists to improve adherence and persistence.Keywords: administrative claims, healthcare costs, treatment adherence and compliance, drug administration routeshttps://www.dovepress.com/evaluating-treatment-patterns-relapses-healthcare-resource-utilization-peer-reviewed-article-CEORadministrative claimshealth care coststreatment adherence and compliancedrug administration routes
spellingShingle Freeman L
Kee A
Tian M
Mehta R
Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
administrative claims
health care costs
treatment adherence and compliance
drug administration routes
title Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients
title_full Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients
title_fullStr Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients
title_short Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients
title_sort evaluating treatment patterns relapses healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with disease modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis in dmt na iuml ve patients
topic administrative claims
health care costs
treatment adherence and compliance
drug administration routes
url https://www.dovepress.com/evaluating-treatment-patterns-relapses-healthcare-resource-utilization-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
work_keys_str_mv AT freemanl evaluatingtreatmentpatternsrelapseshealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsassociatedwithdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsformultiplesclerosisindmtnaiumlvepatients
AT keea evaluatingtreatmentpatternsrelapseshealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsassociatedwithdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsformultiplesclerosisindmtnaiumlvepatients
AT tianm evaluatingtreatmentpatternsrelapseshealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsassociatedwithdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsformultiplesclerosisindmtnaiumlvepatients
AT mehtar evaluatingtreatmentpatternsrelapseshealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsassociatedwithdiseasemodifyingtreatmentsformultiplesclerosisindmtnaiumlvepatients