Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach Solution

H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> was ensured to be the best candidate for Zr leaching from the eudialyte. The resulting sulfuric leach solution consisted of Zr(IV), Nb(V), Hf(IV), Al(III), and Fe(III). It was found that ordinary metal hydroxide precipitation was not feasible for o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yiqian Ma, Srecko Stopic, Xuewen Wang, Kerstin Forsberg, Bernd Friedrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Metals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/10/8/1099
_version_ 1827709980996796416
author Yiqian Ma
Srecko Stopic
Xuewen Wang
Kerstin Forsberg
Bernd Friedrich
author_facet Yiqian Ma
Srecko Stopic
Xuewen Wang
Kerstin Forsberg
Bernd Friedrich
author_sort Yiqian Ma
collection DOAJ
description H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> was ensured to be the best candidate for Zr leaching from the eudialyte. The resulting sulfuric leach solution consisted of Zr(IV), Nb(V), Hf(IV), Al(III), and Fe(III). It was found that ordinary metal hydroxide precipitation was not feasible for obtaining a relatively pure product due to the co-precipitation of Al(III) and Fe(III). In this reported study, a basic zirconium sulfate precipitation method was investigated to recover Zr from a sulfuric acid leach solution of a eudialyte residue after rare earth elements extraction. Nb precipitated preferentially by adjusting the pH of the solution to around 1.0. After partial removal of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> by adding 120 g of CaCl<sub>2</sub> per 1L solution, a basic zirconium sulfate precipitate was obtained by adjusting the pH to ~1.6 and maintaining the solution at 75 °C for 60 min. Under the optimum conditions, the loss of Zr during the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup><sup>−</sup> removal step was only 0.11%, and the yield in the basic zirconium sulfate precipitation step was 96.18%. The precipitate contained 33.77% Zr and 0.59% Hf with low concentrations of Fe and Al. It was found that a high-quality product of ZrO<sub>2</sub> could be obtained from the basic sulfate precipitate.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:30:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97878f64a5e74986a22738d8579b3bdb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4701
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:30:49Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metals
spelling doaj.art-97878f64a5e74986a22738d8579b3bdb2023-11-20T10:02:31ZengMDPI AGMetals2075-47012020-08-01108109910.3390/met10081099Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach SolutionYiqian Ma0Srecko Stopic1Xuewen Wang2Kerstin Forsberg3Bernd Friedrich4Institute of Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling (IME), RWTH Aachen University, Intzestraße 3, 52056 Aachen, GermanyInstitute of Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling (IME), RWTH Aachen University, Intzestraße 3, 52056 Aachen, GermanySchool of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Lushan South Road 932, Changsha 410083, ChinaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 42, 11428 Stockholm, SwedenInstitute of Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling (IME), RWTH Aachen University, Intzestraße 3, 52056 Aachen, GermanyH<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> was ensured to be the best candidate for Zr leaching from the eudialyte. The resulting sulfuric leach solution consisted of Zr(IV), Nb(V), Hf(IV), Al(III), and Fe(III). It was found that ordinary metal hydroxide precipitation was not feasible for obtaining a relatively pure product due to the co-precipitation of Al(III) and Fe(III). In this reported study, a basic zirconium sulfate precipitation method was investigated to recover Zr from a sulfuric acid leach solution of a eudialyte residue after rare earth elements extraction. Nb precipitated preferentially by adjusting the pH of the solution to around 1.0. After partial removal of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> by adding 120 g of CaCl<sub>2</sub> per 1L solution, a basic zirconium sulfate precipitate was obtained by adjusting the pH to ~1.6 and maintaining the solution at 75 °C for 60 min. Under the optimum conditions, the loss of Zr during the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup><sup>−</sup> removal step was only 0.11%, and the yield in the basic zirconium sulfate precipitation step was 96.18%. The precipitate contained 33.77% Zr and 0.59% Hf with low concentrations of Fe and Al. It was found that a high-quality product of ZrO<sub>2</sub> could be obtained from the basic sulfate precipitate.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/10/8/1099zirconiumeudialytehydrometallurgybasic sulfate precipitation
spellingShingle Yiqian Ma
Srecko Stopic
Xuewen Wang
Kerstin Forsberg
Bernd Friedrich
Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach Solution
Metals
zirconium
eudialyte
hydrometallurgy
basic sulfate precipitation
title Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach Solution
title_full Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach Solution
title_fullStr Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach Solution
title_full_unstemmed Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach Solution
title_short Basic Sulfate Precipitation of Zirconium from Sulfuric Acid Leach Solution
title_sort basic sulfate precipitation of zirconium from sulfuric acid leach solution
topic zirconium
eudialyte
hydrometallurgy
basic sulfate precipitation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/10/8/1099
work_keys_str_mv AT yiqianma basicsulfateprecipitationofzirconiumfromsulfuricacidleachsolution
AT sreckostopic basicsulfateprecipitationofzirconiumfromsulfuricacidleachsolution
AT xuewenwang basicsulfateprecipitationofzirconiumfromsulfuricacidleachsolution
AT kerstinforsberg basicsulfateprecipitationofzirconiumfromsulfuricacidleachsolution
AT berndfriedrich basicsulfateprecipitationofzirconiumfromsulfuricacidleachsolution