Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh

The increasing frequency of extreme drought and intense precipitation events with global warming may affect CH emissions from different types of wetlands by regulating drying–wetting cycles. To determine the effects of different water regimes on CH emissions, a mesocosm experiment was conducted. Soi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoyan Zhu, Changchun Song, Weiwei Chen, Xinhou Zhang, Baoxian Tao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-05-01
Series:Vadose Zone Journal
Online Access:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/vzj/articles/17/1/180017
_version_ 1818977828507484160
author Xiaoyan Zhu
Changchun Song
Weiwei Chen
Xinhou Zhang
Baoxian Tao
author_facet Xiaoyan Zhu
Changchun Song
Weiwei Chen
Xinhou Zhang
Baoxian Tao
author_sort Xiaoyan Zhu
collection DOAJ
description The increasing frequency of extreme drought and intense precipitation events with global warming may affect CH emissions from different types of wetlands by regulating drying–wetting cycles. To determine the effects of different water regimes on CH emissions, a mesocosm experiment was conducted. Soil cores sampled from peatland and gley marsh were subjected to two drying–wetting cycles (i.e., fluctuating between −10 and 10 cm for 7 and 15 d, respectively) and three steady water table treatments (10, 0, and −10 cm). Alternation between drying and wetting stimulated CH emissions ( = 16.03 for 7 d and = 31.85 for 15 d, < 0.01). The highest emission pulses were observed between 4 and 9 d after the water table increased according to the models. Peak pulse emissions significantly increased by 41% in peatland and 109% in gley marsh after rewetting compared with that in the steady 0-cm water table treatment. Peatland soils had higher CH emissions than gley marsh soils under steady water table treatments ( < 0.01). This study shows that large pulses of CH can be emitted during short-duration drying–wetting episodes. If these pulses are not accounted for in budgets, CH emissions may be incorrectly assessed when comparing with field measurements during regularly spaced sampling intervals over only a few days or weeks by the static opaque chamber technique. Accurate estimates of CH budgets not only depend on increased measurement frequency but by necessity should incorporate weather events that cause rapid changes in the soil moisture regime.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T16:33:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-97897c5d54db4d659a745c322e1c7750
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1539-1663
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T16:33:57Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Vadose Zone Journal
spelling doaj.art-97897c5d54db4d659a745c322e1c77502022-12-21T19:33:13ZengWileyVadose Zone Journal1539-16632018-05-0117110.2136/vzj2018.01.0017Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley MarshXiaoyan ZhuChangchun SongWeiwei ChenXinhou ZhangBaoxian TaoThe increasing frequency of extreme drought and intense precipitation events with global warming may affect CH emissions from different types of wetlands by regulating drying–wetting cycles. To determine the effects of different water regimes on CH emissions, a mesocosm experiment was conducted. Soil cores sampled from peatland and gley marsh were subjected to two drying–wetting cycles (i.e., fluctuating between −10 and 10 cm for 7 and 15 d, respectively) and three steady water table treatments (10, 0, and −10 cm). Alternation between drying and wetting stimulated CH emissions ( = 16.03 for 7 d and = 31.85 for 15 d, < 0.01). The highest emission pulses were observed between 4 and 9 d after the water table increased according to the models. Peak pulse emissions significantly increased by 41% in peatland and 109% in gley marsh after rewetting compared with that in the steady 0-cm water table treatment. Peatland soils had higher CH emissions than gley marsh soils under steady water table treatments ( < 0.01). This study shows that large pulses of CH can be emitted during short-duration drying–wetting episodes. If these pulses are not accounted for in budgets, CH emissions may be incorrectly assessed when comparing with field measurements during regularly spaced sampling intervals over only a few days or weeks by the static opaque chamber technique. Accurate estimates of CH budgets not only depend on increased measurement frequency but by necessity should incorporate weather events that cause rapid changes in the soil moisture regime.https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/vzj/articles/17/1/180017
spellingShingle Xiaoyan Zhu
Changchun Song
Weiwei Chen
Xinhou Zhang
Baoxian Tao
Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh
Vadose Zone Journal
title Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh
title_full Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh
title_fullStr Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh
title_short Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh
title_sort effects of water regimes on methane emissions in peatland and gley marsh
url https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/vzj/articles/17/1/180017
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyanzhu effectsofwaterregimesonmethaneemissionsinpeatlandandgleymarsh
AT changchunsong effectsofwaterregimesonmethaneemissionsinpeatlandandgleymarsh
AT weiweichen effectsofwaterregimesonmethaneemissionsinpeatlandandgleymarsh
AT xinhouzhang effectsofwaterregimesonmethaneemissionsinpeatlandandgleymarsh
AT baoxiantao effectsofwaterregimesonmethaneemissionsinpeatlandandgleymarsh